On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 20:48:43 -0500 Hank Medler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Does anyone happen to know the QNAME that is used by IDCAMS for member
:deletion when using the FILE parameter on the DELETE statement? Is it
:SYSZOPEN? I read through z/OS 1.6 DFSMS Access Method Services for Catalogs
From: Binyamin Dissen
Nowadays one gets an abend if more than one job opens the same PDS for
output.
mm - maybe.
*if* everybody is playing with the same deck of cards.
Go edit a member of a PDS and whilst in the edit session run a batch UPDTE
to replace the same member.
You'd better be
From: Binyamin Dissen
Nowadays one gets an abend if more than one job opens the same PDS for
output.
From: Shane
mm - maybe.
*if* everybody is playing with the same deck of cards.
Abend S213-30 addresses the situation of a PDS opened for OUTPUT with
DISP=SHR.
Regards,
John Kalinich
Shane has said all that needs to be said, viz.,
Use DISP=OLD, or migrate it to a PDSE.
It may be indeed that he has said more than enough. I would delete the
first term in his disjunction.
John Gilmore
Ashland, MA 01721
USA
Shane,
In Flaubert's much abused words, Le bon Dieu est dans le détail. The
original poster was talking of writing an HLASM routine to (a) cope with an
old, old problem that he understood imperfectly and (b) with one that,
moreover, the design of PDSEs addresses bang on.
I am not
Does anyone happen to know the QNAME that is used by IDCAMS for member
deletion when using the FILE parameter on the DELETE statement? Is it
SYSZOPEN? I read through z/OS 1.6 DFSMS Access Method Services for Catalogs
manual, but I don't see any indication of what is happening under the
covers. In
6 matches
Mail list logo
