Clark Morris writes:
My view of it is that the software charge per MIP/MSU/latest
measurement unit should follow the same trend as the Windows cost per
megahertz.
*IBM* software pricing per MIP keeps declining, taking all factors into
account and for the *typical* environment. (See a previous
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:00:58 -0400, Clark Morris wrote:
My view of it is that the software charge per MIP/MSU/latest
measurement unit should follow the same trend as the Windows cost per
megahertz. Software legitimately (added security and error checking)
takes more system resource for the same
On 14 Jan 2007 06:14:37 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Ted,
Just because *you* aren't seeing them does not mean others are not. My
MIPS have been increasing and my charges, at worst, are holding their
own year over year. Keep that room in the tower, Timothy!
My view of it is that
- Original Message -
From: Clark Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 3:00 PM
Subject: Software charges was Re: Is anyone still
running..
On 14 Jan 2007 06:14:37 -0800
On 14 Jan 2007 12:11:00 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Clark Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 3:00 PM
Subject: Software charges was Re: Is anyone still
running
5 matches
Mail list logo
