Hi all,
ISPF Option 3.4 with just the volser, I receive message in the upper right
corner of the screen.
"Incomplete VTOC list"
PF1 shows
"Index entry not included because VTOC entry does not exist."
I assume this dasd is trashed and need to be re-inited?
The data sets are still working. I can
I was able to run a List VTOC. It looks normal.
DATE: 2006.265 TIME: 12.03.51
CONTENTS OF VTOC ON VOL SYS501
THERE IS A 1 LEVEL VTOC
INDEX
DATA SETS ARE LISTED IN ALPHANUMERIC ORDER
.
THERE ARE 2121 EMPTY CYLINDERS PLUS58 EMPTY TRACKS ON THIS VOLUME
THERE ARE3559 BLANK DSCBS IN
5
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
VTOC trashed?
Hi all,
ISPF Option 3.4 with just the volser, I receive message in the upper right
corner of the screen.
"Incomplete VTOC list"
PF1 shows
"Index entry not included because
I would attempt to migrate as much data off as possible, or backing up,
before anything else.
Daniel McLaughlin
ZOS Systems Programmer
Crawford & Company
PH: 770 621 3256
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Discussion List
09/22/2006 09:35
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
VTOC trashed?
Hi all,
ISPF Option 3.4 with just the volser, I receive message in the upper right
corner of the screen.
"Incomplete VTOC list"
PF1 shows
"Index
Mike, does the VTOCIX (SYS1.VTOCIX.xx) appear in the LISTVTOC? If
not, that seems to match your error message.
Or could the message have been refering to the index component of some
VSAM file? Can you tell if an index which should be on the volume is
missing??
An IDCAMS DIAGOSE of the
These show up in the list VTOC
SYS1.VTOCIX.SYS501
SYS1.VVDS.VSYS501
This one seems to missing the index
SYSV.ING02.TAKEOVER
SYSV.ING02.TAKEOVER.DATA
On 9/22/06, Bruce Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike, does the VTOCIX (SYS1.VTOCIX.xx) appear in the LISTVTOC? If
not, that seems t
This one seems to missing the index
SYSV.ING02.TAKEOVER
SYSV.ING02.TAKEOVER.DATA
It may be an ESDS or another type that has no index. Do a LISTCAT on
the cluster name to see what the component names should be. The
DIAGNOSE should also pick this up if it is really missing
--
Bruce A. Bla
In a message dated 9/22/2006 11:12:45 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
THERE ARE 2121 EMPTY CYLINDERS PLUS58 EMPTY TRACKS ON THIS VOLUME
THERE ARE3559 BLANK DSCBS IN THE VTOC ON THIS VOLUME
THERE ARE285 UNALLOCATED VIRS IN THE INDEX
>>
Maybe the VTOC'
In a message dated 9/22/2006 11:21:06 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An IDCAMS DIAGOSE of the VVDS might find this problem
>>
Oh, might start digging in the EREP logs to see if there's been a hardware
hit on this pack. If you do History logging of EREP should show
Listc shows... does not appear to be an error
ASSOCIATIONS
CLUSTER--SYSV.ING02.TAKEOVER
ASSOCIATIONS
DATA-SYSV.ING02.TAKEOVER.DATA
DATA --- SYSV.ING02.TAKEOVER.DATA
--
Thanks,
Mike
--
For IBM-MAIN subscri
In a message dated 9/22/2006 12:26:31 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Listc shows... does not appear to be an error
>>
How about the DIAGNOSE? What happens if you just try to print the file? If
it's too big can just print to DD DUMMY.
-
In a message dated 9/22/2006 12:34:40 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about the DIAGNOSE? What happens if you just try to print the file? If
it's too big can just print to DD DUMMY.
>>
Oh, IEHLIST for the pack. LISTVTOC will show any overlaps. Haven't had to
..really interested in this thread,.. We have some sysprogs that
maintain their systems that share a disk volume across separate,
nonsysplexed Lpars. Datasets accessed/updated from different systems,..
no GRS protection.
So I am curious if this is a situation that could clobber a vtoc.
gabe
>>
Ma
Ran this..
//DIAG EXEC PGM=IDCAMS,COND=(0,NE)
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSIN DD *
DIAGNOSE VVDS IDS(SYS1.VVDS.VSYS501)
/*
No errors listed.
On 9/22/06, Gabe Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
..really interested in this thread,.. We have some sysprogs that
maintain their systems that share a d
I'd be glad to send anybody the complete problem / resolution when the
problem is fixed.
The list rejected an early email because it had too many replies.
Thanks,Mike
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruct
..really interested in this thread,.. We have some sysprogs that
maintain their systems that share a disk volume across separate,
nonsysplexed Lpars. Datasets accessed/updated from different systems,..
no GRS protection.
So I am curious if this is a situation that could clobber a vtoc.
No. Upda
This command found the problem? No VVDS?
listc ent(/) allDS.VSYS501
SYS501
IDC3012I ENTRY SYS1.VVDS.VSYS501 NOT FOUND+
IDC1566I ** SYS1.VVDS.VSYS501 NOT LISTED
IDC0014I LASTCC=4
IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 8 - REASON CODE IS IGG0CLEG-42
***
On 9/22/06, Mike Szyszka <[EMAIL PROTECT
It seems DIAGNOSE that was run previous did not find the error?
On 9/22/06, Bruce Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ..really interested in this thread,.. We have some sysprogs that
> maintain their systems that share a disk volume across separate,
> nonsysplexed Lpars. Datasets accessed/up
In a message dated 9/22/2006 1:04:03 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This command found the problem? No VVDS?
>>
So all VSAM on the pack is gone? Maybe somebody else can answer, I don't
know if a REFVTOC will make a new VVDS or not. If I had to fix it I'd dump it
t
The VVDS is unique among VSAM files in that it does not have to be
cataloged, and it can be cataloged in multiple catalogs (every catalog
that references datasets on the volume). So the fact that it is not in
the master catalog (which is where your LISTCAT would look) is not an
error. The VVD
Mike Szyszka wrote:
Hi all,
ISPF Option 3.4 with just the volser, I receive message in the upper
right
corner of the screen.
"Incomplete VTOC list"
PF1 shows
"Index entry not included because VTOC entry does not exist."
I assume this dasd is trashed and need to be re-inited?
The data sets are
ISPF 3.4 shows this
SYS1.VVDS.VSYS501 SYS501
This command founds an error
listc ent(/) allDS.VSYS501
SYS501
IDC3012I ENTRY SYS1.VVDS.VSYS501 NOT FOUND+
IDC1566I ** SYS1.VVDS.VSYS501 NOT LISTED
IDC0014I L
>Datasets accessed/updated from different systems,.. no GRS protection. So I am
>curious if this is a situation that could clobber a vtoc.
Not if you are doing reserve/release processing.
(Though, it is a performance hit).
When in doubt.
PANIC!!
-
In a message dated 9/22/2006 1:35:28 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looks like a buildix is next?
>>
Guess I'd try a BR14 on it first.
//S1 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
//DD1 DD DSN=&&TEMP,VOL=SER=vv,UNIT=3390,SPACE=(TRK,(10)),
// DISP=(NEW,PASS)
If the IX is brok
the benefit
of the youngsters) These stories are from the bad old days before TSO.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Szyszka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Friday, 22 September, 2006 4:35 PM
Subject: VTOC trashed?
> Hi all,
>
> IS
On 25 Sep 2006 12:12:39 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Mason) wrote:
I
was the naively "smart" one - had too quickly keyed up a
SCRATCH VTOC,VOL=2314=whtevr,SYS
card for my IEHPROGM cards. The "too quickly" means that
the comma befo
22, 2006 9:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: VTOC trashed?
Hi all,
ISPF Option 3.4 with just the volser, I receive message in the upper
right
corner of the screen.
"Incomplete VTOC list"
PF1 shows
"Index entry not included because VTOC entry does not exist."
I assume
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/22/2006
at 02:14 PM, Ed Finnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>So all VSAM on the pack is gone? Maybe somebody else can answer, I
>don't know if a REFVTOC will make a new VVDS or not.
It certainly won't fill in the missing catalog information. Do you[1]
have a recen
No- problem is still here... have a pressing matter to ask you all.
New message.
On 9/27/06, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/22/2006
at 02:14 PM, Ed Finnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>So all VSAM on the pack is gone? Maybe somebody else can
30 matches
Mail list logo
