Bill Fairchild wrote
One should always initialize the entire remote parameter list for any
system service. The IBM books that describe Assembler language services
say this in the Using the Services section that appears prior to the first
service explained in that book. E.g., here is some of the
That doesn't help us here.
Jon L. Veilleux
veilleu...@aetna.com
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Edward Jaffe
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 5:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: What's up
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Edward Jaffe
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 5:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: What's up with WTO? - solved
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:46:15 -0700, Steve Comstock
st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
Ah! That's got it! Thanks, Keven
, Jon L
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 8:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: What's up with WTO? - solved
That doesn't help us here.
Jon L. Veilleux
veilleu...@aetna.com
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 8:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: What's up with WTO? - solved
Jon,
A Length was added to the MVC command. Otherwise the default length was used.
mvc Detailmsg,sDetailmsg
Steve provided a sample program
Here's an even more stripped down version
...@aetna.com
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 8:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: What's up with WTO? - solved
Jon,
A Length was added to the MVC
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:29:09 -0700, Steve Comstock
st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
Thanks Lizette, I just thought that it would be nice to see some
information about how the issue was resolved.
It was included in the post:
I missed the explanation of why something that
: +1.617.614.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Mark Zelden
Sent: 24 November 2009 13:43
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: What's up with WTO? - solved
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:54:59 -0500, Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:
It worked by pure chance - the OP was lucky that the workarea storage was
zeroes.
Once the un-initialized storage was dirty - then there was a chance that
WTO would complain about invalid bit settings.
So it's
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:54:59 -0500, Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:
It worked by pure chance - the OP was lucky that the workarea storage was
zeroes.
Once the un-initialized storage was dirty - then there was a chance that
WTO would complain about invalid bit
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:26:59 -0700, Steve Comstock
st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:54:59 -0500, Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com
wrote:
It worked by pure chance - the OP was lucky that the workarea storage was
zeroes.
Once the un-initialized
Comstock
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 8:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: What's up with WTO? - solved
The real cause of the problem was not providing an
explicit length value. I went back to the code that
had always worked and saw that there was a length
value there. Somehow my cut
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:36:57 -0600, Mark Zelden
mark.zel...@zurichna.com wrote:
And people wonder why some sysprogs are skeptical when
application programmers and system users come to them with a problem
and say nothing changed. (I try go by trust, but verify)
Can I hear an Amen?
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:26:59 -0700, Steve Comstock
st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:54:59 -0500, Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com
wrote:
It worked by pure chance - the OP was lucky that the workarea storage was
zeroes.
Once
Mark Zelden wrote:
I try go by trust, but verify
Tru dat! I do the same with customers and developers alike! Sometimes
they take offense. That is, until my detail-oriented approach uncovers
their dumb mistake...
And, ...yes,... I occasionally fall into the trap myself. (Usually, not
need a length in the MVC.
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390 (Office)
From:
Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
11/24/2009 08:17 AM
Subject:
Re: What's up with WTO? - solved
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Jon,
A Length was added to the MVC
John Kelly wrote:
When defining DSECT entries, I always find it better to let the assembler
figure out lengths,ie use the length of the generated WTO to define the
length DSECT entry
sDetailmsg wto text=,routcde=(11),mf=l
endmsg ds 0H
then
Detailmsg ds
It worked by pure chance - the OP was lucky that the workarea storage
was zeroes.
Once the un-initialized storage was dirty - then there was a chance that
WTO would complain about invalid bit settings.
Easiest test for this is to turn on dirty getmain - I had a hard time time,
too,
to find
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:32:48 -0700, Steve Comstock
st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
[cross posted to ibm-assembler]
All of a sudden, WTO code I've used for ages is abending
with SD23. I've checked and rechecked the code. I've
created a minimalist program. Same story. Is there something
going on
Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
11/23/2009 01:40 PM
Subject:
What's up with WTO?
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
[cross posted to ibm-assembler]
All of a sudden, WTO code I've used for ages is abending
with SD23. I've checked
[cross posted to ibm-assembler]
All of a sudden, WTO code I've used for ages is abending
with SD23. I've checked and rechecked the code. I've
created a minimalist program. Same story. Is there something
going on with WTO?
--
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
Hall, Keven wrote:
What length value does the assembler generate for:
mvc Detailmsg,sDetailmsg
Keven Hall | keh...@informatica.com
Software Operative
Office: 512-795-6959
Ah! That's got it! Thanks, Keven, and Robert. Once
I added in a length modifier, it works!
--
Kind regards,
-Steve
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:46:15 -0700, Steve Comstock
st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
Hall, Keven wrote:
What length value does the assembler generate for:
mvc Detailmsg,sDetailmsg
Keven Hall | keh...@informatica.com
Software Operative
Office: 512-795-6959
Ah! That's got it! Thanks, Keven,
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:46:15 -0700, Steve Comstock
st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
Ah! That's got it! Thanks, Keven, and Robert. Once
I added in a length modifier, it works!
Wow! I didn't know IBM-MAIN even had clairvoyant people monitoring
the list. What a bonus
24 matches
Mail list logo
