In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 08/01/2005
at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>In my naivete, why not?
Because it would allow through spam. Spammers are notorious for using
forged addresses, and there is nothing to stop them from sending with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as the reverse path, F
...
please add our e-mail address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], to
>your address book and safe sender list.".
That's not a request that your postmaster is likely to go along with.
...
In my naivete, why not?
(Of course, I still laugh at the request to do something if you don't receive
this)
-teD
In God
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 07/28/2005
at 02:14 PM, Hylton Tom P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Recently, the following instructions have prefaced all of the
>announcements,
>"An increasing number of e-mail clients are using spam blockers that
>can affect delivery and display of some e-mail message
th annual releases of OS, and I applaud
their efforts to try to keep me as informed as possible with things like
ISource.
It's all gravy.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 8:00 PM
To:
...
To ensure delivery and
proper display of your IBM Announcement . . .
...
It is to laugh!
How the H-E double toothpicks do I follow instructions if I never receive them?
Fortunately, I can define what is/is not SPAM.
And, I can see the stuff that was deemed to be SPAM.
-teD
In God we Trust
teriously as it stopped, or perhaps
will at least prompt a response from them.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mark Yuhas
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 12:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: What happened to iSource?
I hav
...
No, I am not going to have IBM send these e-mails to my private e-mail
box that I use at home. I keep the two separate
...
Open a free INTERNET one for that purpose.
There are a couple of sites that won't accept those kinds of accounts,
but I did that for the time between when I was down-size
Thanks for the input.
I have no control over our firewalls and/or SPAM filter. Further, the
group that administers and maintains these e-mail filters does not send
any notification as to what is being filtered or what will be filtered.
No, I am not going to have IBM send these e-mails to my priv
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 07/27/2005
at 09:47 AM, Mark Yuhas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I have subscribed to iSource for a number of years. However, a few
>months ago the weekly e-mails stopped. No message. Nothing.
Chance are that your mail server is blocking them due to spam issues.
If I
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
07/27/2005
at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>There are procedures that these maintainers have to get IP address
>ranges taken off the lists. Sadly no one at IBM has taken the
>initiative, or even determined why people are reporting IBM for
>spamming
In a message dated 7/27/2005 4:15:30 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course, I still haven't figured out how to follow instructions I haven't
received.
(8-{]}
>>
Our Help Desk sent out an update memo re one of our servers,
"If you don't get this, eMail us!"
...
No Ted - not customers or e-mail recipients, but the volunteer organizations
that maintain blacklists. Many, many postmasters use these lists to block
spam.
There are procedures that these maintainers have to get IP address ranges
taken off the lists. Sadly no one at IBM has taken the init
initiative, or even
determined why people are reporting IBM for spamming.
Later,
Ray
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday July 26 2005 17:00
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What happened to iSource?
...
I e
...
I e-mailed IBM and the response I got was basically "we're too lazy to
contact the keepers of the blacklists to get this resolved."
...
Now! Be fair!
How can IBM go around and tell every customer how/what to change.
That would be:
A. Onerous.
B. Expensive.
C. Ignored (in many cases).
It's up t
On Jul 27, 2005, at 11:47 AM, Mark Yuhas wrote:
I have subscribed to iSource for a number of years. However, a few
months ago the weekly
e-mails stopped. No message. Nothing. Three weeks ago, I
reregistered
for iSource and received the usual e-mail acknowledgement. Still no
iSource missiv
frame Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of McKown, John
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 12:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: What happened to iSource?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mar
lazy to
contact the keepers of the blacklists to get this resolved."
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mark Yuhas
Sent: Wednesday July 27 2005 09:48
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: What happened to iSource?
I have su
In a message dated 7/27/2005 11:57:06 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All my email lists are set to REPRO
so that I should get copies of my own posts. I no longer get them. But
>>
I just set mailer to keep a copy of Sent Mail YES and then for
Listserv ACK(nowledge) w
In a message dated 7/27/2005 11:48:04 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have I committed a social faux pas? Or, is there some secret handshake
I am not privy to?
>>
What's changed on your end? New firewalls, Net Nanny's, OS,
routers, switches, IP address(s). Takes two
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Yuhas
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:48 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: What happened to iSource?
>
>
> I have subscribed to iSource for a n
I have subscribed to iSource for a number of years. However, a few
months ago the weekly
e-mails stopped. No message. Nothing. Three weeks ago, I reregistered
for iSource and received the usual e-mail acknowledgement. Still no
iSource missives. I then sent an e-mail to the iSource people via
21 matches
Mail list logo
