Does anyone use message IEE889I (the response to D C) for
automation? If so, how big a deal would it be to change it (for
example, if we were to change the message ID and format of the
response)?
--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
We use it, but it wouldn't be a big deal to change our automation to
deal with new message Ids or format.
Alan
-Original Message-
Does anyone use message IEE889I (the response to D C) for
automation? If so, how big a deal would it be to change it (for
example, if we were to change the
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Eells
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:09 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Who uses IEE899I for Automation?
>
>
> Does anyone use message IEE889
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:09:02 -0400, John Eells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does anyone use message IEE889I (the response to D C) for
>automation?
Hi John,
I'm pretty sure the AO folks use it if there is a buffer shortage.
They parse the output to see what console has the shortage and
change it
>I'm pretty sure the AO folks use it if there is a buffer shortage.
>They parse the output to see what console has the shortage and change
it to >roll mode or perhaps even VARY it OFFLINE.
>If any console gets more that 200 messages, automation does a K
Q,L=consid >to remove them.
Won't the Messa
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 13:09 -0400, John Eells wrote:
> Does anyone use message IEE889I (the response to D C) for
> automation?
Most of our production jobs contain a step at the end that only executes
in case of JCL error, ABEND or unusual completion codes. This step logs
the failure and notifies
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:57:31 -0400, Bob Shannon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I'm pretty sure the AO folks use it if there is a buffer shortage.
>>They parse the output to see what console has the shortage and change
>it to >roll mode or perhaps even VARY it OFFLINE.
>
>>If any console gets more th
We do the same thing for the same reasons.
Jerry Whitteridge
Safeway Inc
925 951 4184
> -Original Message-
>
> I use it because we sometimes have TN3270E consoles "back up" due to
> undeletable messages in RD mode. If any console gets more that 200
> messages, automation does a K Q,L=
uses IEE899I for Automation?
Does anyone use message IEE889I (the response to D C) for
automation? If so, how big a deal would it be to change it (for
example, if we were to change the message ID and format of the
response
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:09:02 -0400, John Eells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does anyone use message IEE889I (the response to D C) for
>automation? If so, how big a deal would it be to change it (for
>example, if we were to change the message ID and format of the
>response)?
> ...
My original resp
John Eells wrote:
Does anyone use message IEE889I (the response to D C) for automation?
If so, how big a deal would it be to change it (for example, if we were
to change the message ID and format of the response)?
We use it as a way to make some Netview system automation dependent upon
the n
>I'm pretty sure the AO folks use it if there is a buffer shortage.
>They parse the output to see what console has the shortage and change
it to >roll mode or perhaps even VARY it OFFLINE.
>If any console gets more that 200 messages, automation does a K
Q,L=consid >to remove them.
Won't the Mess
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 10:57 +0100, TISLER Zaromil wrote:
> I've also seen consoles in the held mode causing WTO buffer shortage.
Been there, seen that.
Ops went out to the (lights out) DR site to load some tapes into the
ATL. Came back but left the remote (prod) console in HOLD.
The shifts change
Was that the exec that defined the consoles to CICS? I remember IEE899I
being automated for console message backups also. I'll drop them a
note.
Mark
>
> Date:Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:38:15 -0500
> From:=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrick_O'Keefe?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> S
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:27:46 -0700, Gibbons, Mark
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Was that the exec that defined the consoles to CICS? I remember IEE899I
>being automated for console message backups also. I'll drop them a
>note.
>...
That was your code in the A/O NetViews. I take no responsabilit
15 matches
Mail list logo
