Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-28 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:44:30 -0500, Chris Mason wrote: >... >[3] In principle this applies to APPN nodes also and could be used to >argue that, just because a LEN or APPN node does not have a "visible" >PU, it still has a PU and that the PU could be used to characterise the >type 2.1 node! No

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-27 Thread Chris Mason
Pat Yes, I suspected that this peculiar TCP62 implementation could have distorted your vision of AnyNet SNA over IP. It would appear that TCP62 behaves as a LEN node with just one single logical link end-point implemented as the TCP (and UDP) sockets program following AnyNet SNA over IP protoc

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-26 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
Just one small comment on one very small excerpt: On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:07:15 -0500, Chris Mason wrote: >... >Pat, there's a hole in your education! ... Chris, This definitely not the first time you've discovered that! :-) Nor the first time I've displayed that on this list (and others). >

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-26 Thread Chris Mason
Pat > While true, there isn't much need for it, either. You're using the wrong tense; try "was" for "is". In the days when AnyNet Sockets over SNA was created, the mid-90s, there was an golden opportunity not to scrap SNA network infrastructure in favour of IP network infrastructure but simply

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-25 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:53:46 -0500, Chris Mason wrote: >... Regrettably there is no replacement for the >brilliant AnyNet Sockets over SNA function. While true, there isn't much need for it, either. It's rare to find 2 devices with SNA connectivity that don't have IP connectivity. >... >Ther

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-25 Thread Chris Mason
Jim > Is there any replacement function for Anynet SNA over TCPIP. Jim Wangler's response was incorrect only in the last character. There is no need for a question mark. Enterprise Extender is the excuse to remove the AnyNet SNA over IP function. Regrettably there is no replacement

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-24 Thread Ernie Takeuchi
the ability to connect IP. Ernie. > When configuring z/OS 1.9 I find that the "VBUILD TYPE=TCP" vtam definition > no longer exists. Is there any replacement function for Anynet SNA over > TCPIP.

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-24 Thread Staller, Allan
AFAIK, Anynet is no longer supported. As of z/OS 1.8 See http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/e0z2m151.pdf pp 133-134 Subject: anynet SNA over TCPIP When configuring z/OS 1.9 I find that the "VBUILD TYPE=TCP" vtam definition no longer exists. Is there any replacement function

Re: anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-24 Thread Jim Wangler
Enterprise Extender? Jim Wangler 214-502-6445 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 10:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: anynet SNA over TCPIP When configuring z/OS 1.9 I

anynet SNA over TCPIP

2009-06-24 Thread Jim McAlpine
When configuring z/OS 1.9 I find that the "VBUILD TYPE=TCP" vtam definition no longer exists. Is there any replacement function for Anynet SNA over TCPIP. Jim McAlpine -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arch