Schneiderwent, Craig wrote:
Mark [mwvconix] wrote, in part:
-8With all due respect Tom, I'm not familiar with any IBM documentation
that says I cannot or should not establish my own ESTAE recovery
routines in and around LE based routines. I do not see this in the ASM
manuals, nor have I s
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:15:20 -0500, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I appreciate the pointers though. If in the unlikely event I
>eventually find myself writing those LE handlers, I'll definitely be
>re-reading in detail those aforementioned LE chapters.
>
>-Mark
In that event you might or m
Mark [mwvconix] wrote, in part:
-8http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ceea2150/5.2.7
"[...] For example, any ESTAE or ESPIE that you issue interferes with
Language Environment condition handling."
It goes on to indicate that for "(E)STAE/(E)SPIE/SETRP/STAX", "Host servi
Bill Klein wrote:
Mark,
Tom Ross has already responded that what you are trying to do is not the
right way to do it. To paraphrase, you are trying to use a screw-driver as a
hammer. It MIGHT work (in some cases) but it certainly is NOT the right way
to do this. What you need (or should do) is
Mark wrote:
Mark wrote:
I have an ASM main task that establishes an ESTAE.
It then calls a COBOL subroutine (establishing an estae trap(on,nospie))
where it abends with an 0C4/11
LE calls the CEEBXITA routine and appears to process its recovery.
My asm ESTAE takes control and eventually retur
Mark,
Tom Ross has already responded that what you are trying to do is not the
right way to do it. To paraphrase, you are trying to use a screw-driver as a
hammer. It MIGHT work (in some cases) but it certainly is NOT the right way
to do this. What you need (or should do) is read up on LE condit
Mark wrote:
I have an ASM main task that establishes an ESTAE.
It then calls a COBOL subroutine (establishing an estae trap(on,nospie))
where it abends with an 0C4/11
LE calls the CEEBXITA routine and appears to process its recovery.
My asm ESTAE takes control and eventually returns back to th
>I have an ASM main task that establishes an ESTAE.
>
>It then calls a COBOL subroutine (establishing an estae trap(on,nospie))
>where it abends with an 0C4/11
You cannot have your ESTAE in effect when running in LE code. LE requires
its own ESTAE to be in effect. Form my SHARE presentation at B
I have an ASM main task that establishes an ESTAE.
It then calls a COBOL subroutine (establishing an estae trap(on,nospie))
where it abends with an 0C4/11
LE calls the CEEBXITA routine and appears to process its recovery.
My asm ESTAE takes control and eventually returns back to the OS.
Then a
9 matches
Mail list logo
