host codepge 0037 and the obscure "not sign"

2012-03-12 Thread Tom Rusnak
Our 3270 emulator is IBM's Personal Communications V5.0 for Windows, commonly known as PCOMM I believe. We use "0037 United States" as the host code page. the "NOT SIGN" is x'5F' in codepage 0037. All evidence I can find says that the "NOT SIGN" is x'AC' in unicode and on unix environments.

Re: host codepge 0037 and the obscure "not sign"

2012-03-13 Thread Mark Douglas (CITEC)
arch 2012 4:30 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: host codepge 0037 and the obscure "not sign" Our 3270 emulator is IBM's Personal Communications V5.0 for Windows, commonly known as PCOMM I believe. We use "0037 United States" as the host code page. the "NOT SI

Re: host codepge 0037 and the obscure "not sign"

2012-03-13 Thread Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4)
Try quote site sbdataconn(IBM-037,ISO8859-1) before your get or put command. This tells the ftp server what translation to apply. If it help, find out what is setup at your location. Have a look at the FTP data configuration file (http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/f1a1b

Re: host codepge 0037 and the obscure "not sign"

2012-03-13 Thread Joel C. Ewing
On 03/13/2012 03:11 AM, Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4) wrote: Try quote site sbdataconn(IBM-037,ISO8859-1) before your get or put command. This tells the ftp server what translation to apply. If it help, find out what is setup at your location. Have a look at the FTP data configuration file (http:/

Re: host codepge 0037 and the obscure "not sign"

2012-03-13 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <0963859761364257.wa.tom.rusnakqbe@bama.ua.edu>, on 03/13/2012 at 01:29 AM, Tom Rusnak said: >All evidence I can find says that the "NOT SIGN" is x'AC' in unicode >and on unix environments. Unix supports multiple code pages, not all of them ISO 8859-x. >However, if I use the z/os 1.1

Re: host codepge 0037 and the obscure "not sign"

2012-03-14 Thread Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4)
>In some cases you might want to specify the code set IBM-1047 rather >than IBM-037. There are unfortunately [at least] two conflicting >EBCDIC-based code sets in common use on z/OS: IBM-037 for applications >from the 3270 tradition, IBM-1047 for applications from the C Language >or UNIX tradi

Re: host codepge 0037 and the obscure "not sign"

2012-03-19 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:51:26 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: >>Is there any translation table in z/os 1.11 that translates the "NOT >>SIGN" x'5F' to an ascii x'AC', > >These is no ASCII 'AC'X; you really need to know what code pages >you're using to get a correct translation. If you use U