We are running z/OS 1.5 at two client sites under VM on two separate z/196's.
Admittedly not 1.4, but then again, not much difference either. Both are in
the process of upgrading to z/OS 1.13.
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
This may or maynot help..
APAR Reference - OA30560
APAR statusClosed as new function.
Error descriptionRACF functions do not accept certificates containing
distinguished names longer than 246 characters in length.
Additional Symptoms:
RACDCERT longDN ADD CHECKCERT
msgIRRD108I msgIRRD108 IRRD10
We observed, while using STROBE, apparent high CPU use in module CAS9C66.
From CA we found that they had the following on file::
APAR #: RO43562
Product: ENFCIC Release: 14.0Solution #: 7 Type:
OS: OS Group: GCCOMC ISL SUP 2
Title: PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT ON Z/
Hi,
The TSO TEST customization exits which would run out of steplib would they
run off TSOLIB as well
nitialization
IKJEGMIE
Termination
IKJEGMTE
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructio
Frank,
In one environment it was at least a weekly occurrence. In others
once a month and others every 6 months,
In the "weekly" environment it was a lively change management
adventure as we did have several outages (sometime entire sysplex) It
was fraught with issues and maybe if we had be
On 11/14/2012 3:28 PM, Jim Mulder wrote:
Ed - In our environment it didn't work. They said it wouldn't work
and for us it didn't. That's all I know.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Wednesday, N
> Ed - In our environment it didn't work. They said it wouldn't work
> and for us it didn't. That's all I know.
>
> Bob
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> ] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 3:44 PM
I had to re-open the SR to add some additional info and that update does show
it was made by me. But when I reclosed it, the comment I added when I did that
shows that it was made by my co-worker. So it appears that when an SR is
closed the application assumes it was closed by the owner.
---
Hello,
I also posted this message on the RACF-L but was hoping for some further
insight.
We recently copied a RACF database and on the copy we're having problems with
RACDCERT commands on all our Certauth Certificates.
When attempting to list them, I receive this message:
racdcert certauth li
I've already noticed a small bug in the new SR application. We had an open SR
that two of us have been updating. The SR is "owned" by the other person. I
made an update at 6:45 (CST) today and the SR correctly showed that the update
came from me. But when I made an update at about 15:00 and
Ours was PUT0702 + whatever extra PTFs were available. We always do one final
maintenance cycle after releases go off support.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 4:00 P
On 11/14/2012 12:52 PM, Bob Shannon wrote:
Ed - In our environment it didn't work. They said it wouldn't work and for us
it didn't. That's all I know.
Our z/OS 1.4 z/VM guest is "vanilla", brand new out-of-the-box, completely
unserviced without any optional feature downloads applied (e.g., th
Ed - In our environment it didn't work. They said it wouldn't work and for us
it didn't. That's all I know.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 3:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LIST
On 11/12/2012 10:13 PM, Andre Massena wrote:
Some bits need to be massaged (STCP) but all "old" releases of z/OS and
OS/390 for that matter will run under z/VM.
They said it would not work. But, we run z/OS 1.4 under z/VM 6.1 on a z10BC.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
83
Mike, instead of using HSM automatic dump, I would have the job scheduler
schedule a job to run on the first Monday of the month that would execute a
command such as
HSEND WAIT BACKVOL VOLUME(vv) DUMP(DUMPCLASS(MTHLY))
and also define dump class MTHLY with the appropriate retention
charac
I hope someone out there knows the answer. I would like to take a full volume
dump of a DASD volume on Monday and save it for one week.
That much I can figure out with a DUMPCYCLE statement. My question is..is it
possible for DFHSM to detect the first Monday in a month and instead of using a
DUM
This ongoing discussion prompts a question: Are dynamic IODF changes actually
so prevalent in most environments (especially in Production) that the condition
warrants that much consideration ? I, for one, would tend to doubt it. If it
is the case in a 'sandbox' or development type environment,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:45:01 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:
>>
>>Is LISTSERV base64-hostile? Is there any way to report LISTSERV bugs
>>to LSoft?
>
>I have the same problem with R.S.'s posts. Well, the same symptoms,
>I've never looked via email because I am set to NOMAIL.
>
Since I am not set to N
Yes, I know, but one of my goals in this effort is to make the migration
process transparent to the users. Requiring them to change existing
working processes is a non-starter.
Mark Jacobs
On 11/14/12 11:16, Kirk Wolf wrote:
If you use cozsftp -k and the specified keyring:label is not found,
If you use cozsftp -k and the specified keyring:label is not found, you
will get an error message but it will fall back and use the default
~/.ssh/id_rsa private key
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
> IBM has confirmed tha
IBM has confirmed that it isn't working as the documentation suggests.
They're going to have further discussions amongst themselves and most
likely will open up an APAR against Ported Tools.
Mark Jacobs
On 11/07/12 09:16, Mark Jacobs wrote:
Yes, I'm sure that the private key works.
I'll tak
Hi Wayne,
as to ibm'ers, it was just our account support guy and uk back office.
Basically i did the leg work and identified the cause and they had to change
the setting as we couldnt do it directly.
I stumbled across the problem while looking into an email issue on one of our
DS8300's, so had
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:17:54 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
>The question whether these disagreeable consequences are tolerable is
>a judgment call. Sam and others think they are. I think not. So be
>it.
John at his imperious best - consider me one of the others (in this case).
Shane ...
---
On 11/14/2012 2:33 AM, Sam Golob wrote:
Somebody please enlighten me. If you're trying to scratch a
dataset on a pack, and somebody else is in the middle of doing an IODF
change at the time, what is the difference if you are obtaining a copy
of the UCB (to determine what's on the disk pack)
24 matches
Mail list logo
