-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Mike Schwab
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 23:59
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Paging Behaviour; was: Re: DFSORT Weirdness
When we have done PAGEADD and PAGEDELs for Volume
Not true:
Pre-PAV, you could(should) have only 1 page dataset per volume.
With PAV, ASM ensured aliases to have access paths to all page datasets.
Post-PAV, i.e. Hiperpav, ASM trusts Hiperpav to provide the access
paths.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
3390 is a device type. -1, -2, -3, -9, -27, -54, etc are different
sizes of 3390s.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Miklos Szigetvari
miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com wrote:
Hi
Thank you very much, I'm just wandering, but the technician says, every
device type needs a separate control unit
Hi
Thank you
The guy installing this, insists to have a different control unit for
every size
On 05.03.2013 12:25, Mike Schwab wrote:
3390 is a device type. -1, -2, -3, -9, -27, -54, etc are different
sizes of 3390s.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Miklos Szigetvari
Hi,
In IOCP/IOCDS we didn´t define volume type (3390-1, 3390-2, 3390-3,
3390-9 etc...), just define 3390.
In DS6800 definition panels we define a runge of volumes with for
example 3339 cyls for model 3 and another range with 10017 (model 9).
Both ranges could be continuos addresses, 3390-3
Thanks all for helping me . Its working now and able to collected Jobs in
PDS members.
Regards
Saurabh
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:31 PM, saurabh khandelwal
sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to run SDSF rexx to copy SYSOUT into PDS present in
Implementing REXX
Hello All,
I am Installing a product in my Test Environment where already a back
levelled version is running and the current product is of higher version.
Can we assign the same SVC numbers to the same Product of two different
Versions when two different Versions of same product are running
There is only 1 SVC module, how should it know for what release it has
been called?
Check with the vendor, it could be that the new SVC code is downward
compatible with the old version.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Jake anderson wrote:
I am Installing a product in my Test Environment where already a back levelled
version is running and the current product is of higher version. Can we
assign the same SVC numbers to the same Product of two different Versions when
two different Versions of same product are
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 17:53 +0530, Jake anderson wrote:
Can we assign the same SVC numbers to the same Product of two different
Versions when two different Versions of same product are running parallely
If you named the product, someone with specific knowledge could help.
For example: in my
Does the product give you the option of specifying the SVC number, a la
Hogan?
Thomas Ambros
Operating Systems and Connectivity Engineering
518-436-6433
From: David Andrews d...@lists.duda.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 03/05/2013 08:21
Subject:Re: Assigning Same
I'd be very surprised if it prescribed me how I hand out my SVC
numbers...
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Tom Ambros
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 14:48
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Assigning Same
In
cahtvvrwtjtyjz52ucey0sf5y6ukzdyq1qa9re_ksrzovym8...@mail.gmail.com,
on 03/05/2013
at 05:53 PM, Jake anderson justmainfra...@gmail.com said:
I am Installing a product in my Test Environment where already a
back levelled version is running and the current product is of
higher version. Can
In 5135d788.2010...@isis-papyrus.com, on 03/05/2013
at 12:31 PM, Miklos Szigetvari miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com
said:
The guy installing this, insists to have a different control unit for
every size
That sounds like cargo-cult engineering. Have you considered going
over his head and
Ask your vendor whether the new SVC
routine supports the old version of the product.
Yes it does... Thanks
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In
cahtvvrwtjtyjz52ucey0sf5y6ukzdyq1qa9re_ksrzovym8...@mail.gmail.com,
on 03/05/2013
at
That's what I said.
You'd get a message along the lines of:
... paging already active on volume pp ...
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Yes. I'm looking for the documentation.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of DanD
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 4:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Where current HLASM doc?
Charles,
Are you using the
Thanks. This looks promising. Getting
504 Unable to communicate with back-end server
for the documentation but will give it a try again later.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Bob Rutledge
Sent: Monday, March
I don't understand what you mean.
I said that you were always able to put more than one page dataset on a
volume, but that is was stongly not recommended in the pre-PAV period,
except for the small PLPA / large COMMON combination.
I don't remember a message like the one you mention.
Kees.
On 3/5/2013 3:32 AM, Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Hi
We are using the CEE3DMP (LE dump) routine to dump the call stack in some C/C++
program to the SYSPRINT file
It is terrible slow, no CPU just wait (for what ?)
Without this CEE3DMP calls, the program runs in 6 seconds , with dump in 30
minutes,
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:45:29 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
And, did zEC12 indroduce no new addressing modes nor instruction
formats that might affect syntax described in HLASM doc?
AFAIK, Addressing modes, instruction formats and syntax for
machine instructions are documented in the Principles of
I do, from the first time a rookie did a pageadd.
I don't know if you could start with multiple locals on a single volume, but
you couldn't add one later on a volume that was already active.
It cost us an IPL because our 'spares' were all unusable, and we croaked on
unavailable aux.
The rookie
Check out the blog entry at www.share.org/mvsblog and let me know what z/os
tools you use most.
Thanks!
Mary Anne
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
Tom Marchant wrote:
begin extract
AFAIK, Addressing modes, instruction formats and syntax for machine
instructions are documented in the Principles of Operation, not HLASM
doc.
/end extract
and this is the impoortant point that needs to be made here.
In, general, of course, there are
And none of the below is an answer to my question: where are HLASM docs that
cover the ***HLASM*** (not PoP) changes since 2008?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of John Gilmore
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 8:34
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:20:47 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
And none of the below is an answer to my question: where are HLASM docs that
cover the ***HLASM*** (not PoP) changes since 2008?
Do you mean like this from the HLASM R6 General Information manual?
Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org asked:
Where current HLASM doc?
My z/OS R13 collection contains HLASM documentation from 2008. Is there
current HLASM documentation? Or has HLASM just not been updated? (I notice
my z/OS R13 listings say R6.0.) I find that hard to believe. There could
not possibly
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 11:44:18 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:20:47 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
And none of the below is an answer to my question: where are HLASM docs that
cover the ***HLASM*** (not PoP) changes since 2008?
Do you mean like this from the HLASM R6 General
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:57:21 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Are there OPTABLE values that distinguish between z196 and zEC12?
(Is there even a difference?) If so, are these documented?
The best I can find in the v1R6 Programmer's Guide is ZOP, ZS3, ZS4;
2008 information.
As someone said, that
PMFJI here, but documenting important changes only in an APAR leaves out all of
the application programmers like myself who have no access to the APAR
documentation site, which is restricted to systems programmers with valid IBM
logons.
Sometimes I wish they had not done away with TNL's (yeah,
All from 2008.
Ah, 2008! Remember those fabulous z10's?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Kevin Minerley
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 9:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Where current HLASM doc?
So I guess what is being said here is that no, the HLASM folks have not issue a
new manual since 2008. If one wants complete documentation one must look at a
combination of manuals from 2008 plus some number of APARs?
I find that bizarre.
But thank you, yes, I guess that answers my question.
On 3/5/2013 11:18 AM, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
PMFJI here, but documenting important changes only in an APAR leaves out all of
the application programmers like myself who have no access to the APAR
documentation site, which is restricted to systems programmers with valid IBM
logons.
I
Indeed. A public Google search for HLASM ZS5 produces
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1PK97799 as my (YMMV) first
hit, where we find
Add support for IBM zEnterprise 196, or z196 (machine type 2817)
into UNI and ZS5 opcode tables. The following instructions have
been added:
Yes - This was a surprise when it bit.
Bit more happened in the background than Lizette explained. This was not
just a Sysplex wide IPL, but move to new hardware involving new Couple and
CFRM datasets with no ability to move gracefully.
However when the review for all the Sysplex JCL members
Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
PMFJI here, but documenting important changes only in an APAR leaves out all of
the application programmers like myself who have no access to the APAR
documentation site, which is restricted to systems programmers with valid IBM
logons.
Dude,
Someone is blowing smoke ...and lot of it ..I agree with the other gentleman
get someone that knows what they are doing .
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll
understand. - Chinese Proverb
On Mar 5, 2013, at 5:48
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 16:16:50 -0500, John Gilmore wrote:
It does not much interest IBM's management, I suspect because it is
not the focus of 'interesting' activity. Moreover, it is not a profit
center. It generates no identifiable revenue stream; it is instead
'given away' as a part of the
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
TNLs? Did someone say it's harder to update electronic documentation
than hardcopy? Fairly long ago, I understood that in parts of the
aviation service industry mechanics were allowed to print hardcopies
of
If you want the current APAR information from the assembler, add the INFO
parameter
And if you want to see the current list of opcodes for say UNI, use OPTABLE
(UNI,LIST)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
40 matches
Mail list logo
