http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/03/09/iwd_grace_hopper/
Feature Once again some of the world is celebrating International
Woman's Day (IWD), and it's time to reflect on great female role
models. Ada Lovelace usually grabs most of the attention but I'd like
to use IWD as an excuse to pay
The next meeting of the NY Metro NaSPA Chapter will be on Tuesday, 19
March, 2013, in room 1219 at the IBM Building at 590 Madison Avenue, New
York City, from 10:00 AM until 4:30 PM. We are following the same
registration process as we followed for our October 2012 meeting. Please
see below for
Steve,
Just want to replace subpgm in oldpgm with subpgm from newpgm.
Thx
> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:10:00 -0600
> From: st...@trainersfriend.com
> Subject: Re: iewl syslin
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Well your notes are confusing.
>
> First in your original post you implied the subrouti
Well your notes are confusing.
First in your original post you implied the subroutine
is not a CSECT, but it clearly is.
Now it looks like you are trying to say that OLDPGM calls
SUBPGM (the old version), then you switch to say NEWPGM
calls PROGRAM1 and SUBPGM (the new version), is that correct?
Sources
are not available, vender loadlib are shipped.
Sorry,
had to change name of programs (Ie. vender):
In old.vender.loadlib(oldpgm):
Symbol Type Offset Length Textclass Translator VV
MM Date A/M R/M
oldpgmSD 00
FB79 B_TEXT COBOL II 14 00
2002/07/12
Dear list,
I have two IODF files one for PROD and for TEST,
I want to combine or merge both of then in one master file.
Thanks,
Mohamed Juma
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to l
On Mar 10, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 23:30:23 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
That would not really work to well. An additional parameter on the DD
statement would not allow for dynamic allocation and it would
endlessly make dynamic allocate a PITA especially when you
From: Robert Prins
Date: 03/10/2013 12:48 PM
On 2013-03-10 11:52, Don Imbriale wrote:
1) I'm running Vista tn3270 in a 62x160 mode
I do not have them here with me now, but check your ISPF manuals to ensure
that ISPF will support your custom monitor config.
And be aware, a larger size w
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Robert Prins wrote:
> Command ===> Scroll ===> CSR
> 9) I scroll up once, this puts the line with sequence number 88 on the
> bottom of the screen. The visible line just above it has an underlined
> sequence number
On 2013-03-10 11:52, Don Imbriale wrote:
Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Robert Prins wrote:
DOWN works without problems.
If the penultimate line of the logical screen has an underlined sequence
number, indicating that it's followed by hidden excluded lines, and the
cursor is on the very last lin
Ron Hawkins wrote:
>Others may want to correct me, but from what I've observed OPT(4) is only used
>for the DUMP command.
>COPY will accept OPT(4), but all you seem to get is OPT(3).
I wanted to jump in this thread, saying that OPT() is only for DUMP (as per
documentation for z/OS v1.12), but
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 23:30:23 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
>
>That would not really work to well. An additional parameter on the DD
>statement would not allow for dynamic allocation and it would
>endlessly make dynamic allocate a PITA especially when you have to re-
>invent the input scanning for each util
Shmuel wrote:
INCLUDE specifies the name of a member, not the name of a CSECT, and
you nost certainly can have two members of a library containing the
same CSECT name. The OP needs to disclose more data in order to
diagnose his problem.
and he is of course quite right. It is occasionally conve
In <513bf158.4060...@trainersfriend.com>, on 03/09/2013
at 07:35 PM, Steve Comstock said:
>The syntax is good, and automatic replace works with CSECTs, but
>I'm not really sure if the binder supports automatic replacement
>for alternate entry points.
The binder supports renaming an entry po
In <2475605789153616.wa.asmbenhotmail@listserv.ua.edu>, on
03/09/2013
at 01:52 PM, Ben Chin said:
>It's been a some time (semi-retired), but I have a cobol program
>which has many sub-programs. The problem I'm having is both
>includes have same sub-program one old and newer. The sub-progr
In <071601ce1d01$f7d41fd0$e77c5f70$@net>, on 03/09/2013
at 12:09 PM, Gerhard Adam said:
>Something is missing. Since the INCLUDE statement species the DD
>statement for the library in which the routine resides, you cannot
>have two of them with the same name in that library. I also can't
>th
Just trying to understand the behavior, see if there are any other
anomaliesthat might provide clues. You're
thorough explanation has been quite useful.
"Underlined sequence number, indicating that it's followed by hidden excluded
lines" - does this appear anywhere you have hidden excluded lines,
I tried to recreate it with VISTA on z/OS 1.10, 1.12 and 1.13 and it seems to
work fine. Maybe I'm not doing it exactly like you are, but I followed your
directions exactly.
I'm using version 1.27 of Vista.
Brian
--
For IBM
18 matches
Mail list logo
