On 4/8/2013 9:47 PM, David Cole wrote:
WRT breakpoints, yes, 0C1s will occur when an address space, not involved
in the debugging session, attempts to execute a common storage breakpoint.
However, there are many simple techniques an XDC user can engage to make
this possibility either not occur or
I was never good at keeping secrets but I don't understand the mystery. It
does not matter if it is a simple batch program or an environmentally
complex program. When our code runs it is covered by our recovery routines
but those exits are removed before the user code runs so that the user
recove
Sorry for the typo I meant that the debugger have recovery environment
If the user code has errors
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 8, 2013, at 11:04 PM, Micheal Butz wrote:
> I think Dave is right about one thing
> That a debugger have a debugging
> Environment if the traceable code
> Is faulty
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>In the late 1970's, the Computer 'Pit'. at the University of Waterloo, was
>'borrowed' for a few scenes in a movie called Utilities starring Robert Hayes
>(it came out in 1981).
>The director complained that there weren't enough flashing lights (iirc, it
>was a 158).
>So, a b
I think Dave is right about one thing
That a debugger have a debugging
Environment if the traceable code
Is faulty
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 8, 2013, at 10:57 PM, Ed Jaffe wrote:
> On 4/8/2013 6:47 PM, David Cole wrote:
>> WRT breakpoints, yes, 0C1s will occur when an address space, not invo
On 4/8/2013 6:47 PM, David Cole wrote:
WRT breakpoints, yes, 0C1s will occur when an address space, not
involved in the debugging session, attempts to execute a common
storage breakpoint. However, there are many simple techniques an XDC
user can engage to make this possibility either not occur
These days, the notion that using z/XDC requires modifying user code is no
longer true. Yes, for mature and environmentally complex programs (i.e.
programs consisting of many parts running in a variety of states and
recovery environments), there are advantages with integrating an interface
for z/XD
>>>Hooks in common-storage modules causing 0C1s for later callers (from
another poster)
WRT hooks, this statement is actually false. It is not even partly true.
This because whenever a dynamic hook is reached by execution, the very
first thing it does is remove itself and restore the original code
Thanks Peter.
I've heard:
a- formula uses the default 32 systems/connectors.
b- if I only have 2 systems, then the size from formula can be reduced
So, if b is correct, I'd like to know where the #systems fit in the formula.
As for CFSIZER, the doco says:
>
3. With the structures in the remai
On 2013-04-08 17:13, Gibney, Dave wrote:
> # fuser -cu /tmp
>
> /SYSTEM/tmp: 67108942c(OEDFLTU) 130c(OEDFLTU) 132c(OEDFLTU) 133c(OEDFLTU)
> 134c(OEDFLTU) 135c(OEDFLTU) 136c(OEDFLTU)
Hi Reza,
it seems you're asking about ISGLOCK. Although the formula in the GRS Planning
manual claims this structure is independent of connector count, and only
depends on the peak resource count, playing around with various different
connector counts in CFSIZER seems to indicate otherwise, so
Just wanted to let everyone know what happened. We use websphere broker V8. The
execution groups on the broker use the /tmp directory to allocate work files.
The /tmp TFS system that was used was from the V1.13 serverpack which was only
100meg. We finally stopped all the brokers which released t
# fuser -cu /tmp
/SYSTEM/tmp: 67108942c(OEDFLTU) 130c(OEDFLTU) 132c(OEDFLTU) 133c(OEDFLTU)
134c(OEDFLTU) 135c(OEDFLTU) 136c(OEDFLTU) 137c(OEDFLTU) 13
8c(OEDFLTU) 139c(OEDFLTU) 140c(
In <139601ce33da$91189ec0$b349dc40$@mcn.org>, on 04/07/2013
at 02:55 PM, Charles Mills said:
>BASIC and FORTRAN both used sequence numbers as "labels" but they
>were on the left, not the right, correct?
Those weren't sequence numbers, and sequence numbers are only on the
right for FB.
>Speak
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 21:50:28 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>My point was to possibly make it bigger. I guess I don't see 1866M as small :)
>If you wish to increase it, without an IPL, I expect that to be a problem :)
>
>FUSER fuser -- List process IDs of processes with open files might be helpful,
>b
In
,
on 04/07/2013
at 02:58 PM, John Gilmore said:
>Alexander Pope's abjuration, "Be not the first by whom the new are
>tried, nor yet the last to lay the old aside", nicely encapsulates
>their attitudes.
My attitude is different; as a radical middle of the roader, I'm an
early adopter when I
I'll share a few thoughts I have on a couple of these issues.
One of our design goals for TDF was to require no user code changes. We
feel that you should never have to add code to your program, let alone
design facilities into your code to support the job of the debugger, in
order for you to deb
Thanks Lizette.
Yes, seen it.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
My point was to possibly make it bigger. I guess I don't see 1866M as small :)
If you wish to increase it, without an IPL, I expect that to be a problem :)
FUSER fuser -- List process IDs of processes with open files might be helpful,
but I would expect some important address spaces to show up as
Yes, that's the way they are defined in bpx parms. The problem is I can't
unmount it because it says something is using it, but does not say what is
using it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Gibney, Dave
Sent: Monday,
MOUNT FILESYSTEM('/tmp')
MOUNTPOINT('/tmp') TYPE(TFS) MODE(RDWR) PARM('-s 1866')
MKDIR('ldap')
MOUNT FILESYSTEM('/dev')
This post was approved by the list owner.
I am looking for a new full-time position in software development for large IBM
mainframe z/OS systems. I am fluent in Assembler, z/OS internals, DASD I/O, use
of ISPF, and GTF, inter alia. For more information please contact me privately
at dasdbi..
_IBM Changing the GDDM default APPCPG for a single instance of GDDM -
United States_ (http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21376292)
I'd try this locally and then see why it's 351 globally.
--
For IBM-MAIN subs
Hello all, I have a small TFS problem. We are a z/OS V1.13 system. We have a
tmp omvs directory that came with the system. When we try to allocate a small
file on the tmp directory we get an out of space error. An ls -l does not show
anything allocated in the directory at all. A df command shows
I don't know CMF but a Google search on QMF GDDM CCSID looks promising.
Paul
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
ARMONK, N.Y. - 03 Apr 2013: IBM (NYSE: IBM) today marked the 50th
anniversary of its Fellows program by elevating eight employees to IBM
Fellow for their innovations in such strategic areas as cloud and mobile
computing, big data and business analytics. The new Fellows will be
visible in reinfo
Hello, and apologies in advance for the noise... Not sure where else to pose
the question.
Was wondering, might anyone here have an old copy of VisualAge PL/I 2.1 and/or
VisualAge Cobol 3.07 that they'd be willing to part with for some reasonable
compensation?
Many thanks in advance!!
-Ben
To list;
Further to my earlier message on displaying DB2 data via QMF. In the subject
area is the error message I am getting:
The GDDM CCSID 351 does not match the CCSID of 1047 at database DB9G
Some earlier posts kind of dance around the issue but so far I have not found
any definitive inf
Yeah, all in the code page. Might try spufi select and see if it's the same
or different. Oh and check referential integrity-seen stranger things.
In a message dated 4/8/2013 3:22:15 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
mike.a.sch...@gmail.com writes:
Is QMF V9 expecting Unicode (ASCII), and V8 ex
Is QMF V9 expecting Unicode (ASCII), and V8 expects EBCDIC?
EBCDIC blanks are ASCII @ symbol.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:53 PM, william janulin wrote:
> To list;
>
> I am looking at a DB2 table from two different versions of QMF on different
> systems. On QMF v8 when I run a query on the table,
Typo, Liz. Try http://idug.org
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
> You probably want to, if you have not done so, the DB2 newsgroup
>
> You can join at I dug.org
>
> Lizette
>
>
> -Original Message-
> >From: william janulin
> >Sent: Apr 8, 2013 11:53 AM
> >To: IBM-M
You probably want to, if you have not done so, the DB2 newsgroup
You can join at I dug.org
Lizette
-Original Message-
>From: william janulin
>Sent: Apr 8, 2013 11:53 AM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: QMF query question
>
>To list;
>
> I am looking at a DB2 table from two diff
To list;
I am looking at a DB2 table from two different versions of QMF on different
systems. On QMF v8 when I run a query on the table, I get a valid display of
data. Looking at the same table from QMF v9 the only data elements in the table
that have valid data in them are two date fields. A
On 04/08/2013 09:22 AM, Gabe Goldberg wrote:
The comedy blog Slackstory published "An Ode to Movie Mainframes" this
week, chronicling Hollywood's age-old obsession with "hacking the
mainframe." Movies most often use the phrase to mean that "the hacker
can now do anything he or she wants with a
No. Re-read MY code, not the OP's. Here
MODESET KEY=ZERO,MODE=SUP GO INTO SUPERVISOR MODE
STORAGE OBTAIN,LENGTH=(R9),SP=231,LOC=ANY
LRR3,R1
LRR5,R15
MODESET KEY=NZERO,MODE=PROB BACK TO MORTALITY
STR3,somewhere to pass back
*-
I have been using z/XDC to debug software in a variety of exotic environments
over the last 10 years or so and I have to say that the software has saved
man-months in debugging and development time.
In response to the individual points :
>> In the standard environment, TSO TEST was a lot easier
John Gilmore wrote:
>Recall that he hates JCL in assessing his contentions.
At least he said (with good reasons!) that 12 times since Jan 2011. ;-D
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / ar
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 14:20:16 +, Pew, Curtis G wrote:
>On Apr 8, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>
>> both: 3 //12345678.X IF TRUE THEN
>> and: 3 //.X IF TRUE THEN
>>
>> ... which would appear to be legal according to the description fail with:
>>
>> STMT NO. MESSA
I suspect that Paul Gilmartin knew that these labels had to begin with
an [extended]alphabetic; but since the language of the manual says
only that they must be alphanumeric he was well within his rights as a
controversialist in suggesting that an all-numerics, x'Fd', string
should equally be usabl
In <135301ce33bf$5736eab0$05a4c010$@mcn.org>, on 04/07/2013
at 11:40 AM, Charles Mills said:
>No. Re-read my code.
No need; you save the STORAGE rc into a parameter, but that is not the
value in R15 when your code encounters EDCEPIL.
STR15,0(R11) RETURN CODE, OK IF ZERO
The comedy blog Slackstory published "An Ode to Movie Mainframes" this
week, chronicling Hollywood's age-old obsession with "hacking the
mainframe." Movies most often use the phrase to mean that "the hacker
can now do anything he or she wants with a given computer system." But
in the real world
On Apr 8, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> o The name may be preceded by up to 8 alphanumeric or national characters,
> and then separated by a period. Coding the name in this way should not be
> confused with specifying an override, as can be done when coding DD
> statements.
>
>
Hi,
We are trying to script into tso with a VBSCRIPT. The script looks like
this:
Option Explicit
On Error Resume Next
Dim WshShell
set WshShell=CreateObject("WScript.Shell")
WshShell.run "cmd.exe"
WScript.Sleep 3000
WshShell.SendKeys "telnet"
WshShell.Sendkeys("{Enter}")
WScript.Sleep 1000
Wsh
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 09:12:39 -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
>
>I'm afraid that some of the comments on this thread do not reflect real
>world practical usage. The EXEC PGM= PARM= string is not typically (ever?)
>used in this way. Maybe that's because of the long-standing
>implementation, but that is rea
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 09:11:09 -0400, John Eells wrote:
>>
>> What a fabulous resource this list would be if used in that fashion: a
>> hundred intelligent, experienced programmers willing to do volunteer
>> software design for IBM. What a shame to let it go to waste.
>>
>
>
>Don Ault did precisely
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 05:49:58 -0700, Phil Smith wrote:
>
>In addition, I suspect/believe that update-by-replacement encourages more
>changes than necessary: that is, for 30 years, when I've made a change using
>XEDIT in UPDATE mode, I've ALWAYS looked at the resulting update before
>committing it,
p...@voltage.com (Phil Smith) writes:
> I did an internal Brown Bag a year or so ago, in which I outlined the
> VM CNTRL/AUX/update theology, to a room full of bewildered-looking
> distributed folks. I did preface it with "Obviously the following
> isn't going to change how we do anything, but it m
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 08:35:19 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>
>>So apparently I can code:
>
>>//12345678.WOMBAT INCLUDE FRED No examples given!
>
>A multlevel name is certainly valid on a DD statement, but I'm not
>sure aboute INCLUDE.
>
I haven't a JCLLIB handy. But the JCL RM make
Have you checked out the CFSIZER Tool from IBM?
http://www.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/cfsizer
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf
> Of R Hey
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2013 10:25 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@L
>In many other cases, there are trailing blanks and the programer
>considers them to be significant. That's why ISPF has a PRESERVE
>option. The PARMDD rules appear to thwart the programmers'
>and ISPF's intent here.
I'm afraid that some of the comments on this thread do not reflect real
world
Charles Mills wrote:
more consideration should have been given to usability
If I were the product manager for z/OS, I probably would have thrown the tentative design
out here on IBMMAIN for comment *before* it was "too late to make changes."
What a fabulous resource this list would be if used
+1 for CMS UPDATE, 45+ years old and going strong.
I've been irritated by the update-by-replacement theology since I first
encountered it. The ability to easily look and see what lines were hit by an
update without having to re-run diffs (which takes a long time, relatively
speaking, especially
In <134e01ce33be$b50687f0$1f1397d0$@mcn.org>, on 04/07/2013
at 11:35 AM, Charles Mills said:
>A completely different topic, but sequence numbers are obviously (I
>think. Am I wrong?) entirely a vestigial organ left from the days of
>punched cards.
You're wrong; sequence numbers are still use
In <1291108053097570.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu>, on
04/07/2013
at 01:26 PM, Paul Gilmartin said:
>It's dangerous to let me read reference manuals. In:
>Title: z/OS V1R13.0 MVS JCL Reference
>Document Number: SA22-7597-16
>I read:
> 18.1.2 Name Field
>...
>The name
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:32:53 +0300, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
>I will admit that I am old school - SVCdump, GTF traces, etc. So I can live
>without it.
I can identify somewhat with this. Dealing (only) with small customer sites, I
have never had the pleasure of playing with anything more sophisticat
While exceeding 4 GB may be the usual reason for needing EA, it also provides
some other functionality, such as partial release of space. But if you don't
know why the other datasets are EA then it is hard to determine whether these
need to be changed or not.
> -Original Message-
> Fro
Binyamin you are exactly right
Debugging CSA with XDC
If a program other then the one
Setting the breakpoint hits the breakpoint you will get a s0c1
This product could be come the standard for vendors debugging
Their products
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 8, 2013, at 5:32 AM, Binyamin Dissen wro
I have not been at an installation that has used XDC for a while, so some of
my comments may be old.
In the standard environment, TSO TEST was a lot easier to use.
I had problems using the XDC VTAM to trap simple XMEM (a PC out of the client
address space). Seems like the application frequently h
58 matches
Mail list logo
