In <139601ce33da$91189ec0$b349dc40$@mcn.org>, on 04/07/2013 at 02:55 PM, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> said:
>BASIC and FORTRAN both used sequence numbers as "labels" but they >were on the left, not the right, correct? Those weren't sequence numbers, and sequence numbers are only on the right for FB. >Speaking of not portable program formats, didn't Symbolic Optimal >Assembly Program (SOAP) optimize code speed by scattering >instructions around a drum such that the next instruction to be >executed was just coming under the read head? Do you know of any 650 assembler that didn't? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN