-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Steve Thompson
Sent: 26 November, 2014 21:08
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VLF caching
On 11/26/2014 11:19 AM, Bob Shannon wrote:
> I tend to agree with the OP. LLA will on
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bob Shannon
Sent: 26 November, 2014 17:20
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VLF caching
>>VLF writes SMF 41 records, but they are unusable for LLA.
>That is not correct. It is t
> What are you trying to do?
Just curiosity. Got a hint offline. It's in the JES2 init & tuning guide,
chapter 2, JES2 System Data Sets. I've been almost there, but then gave up too
early.
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
For IBM-MAIN su
On 26 November 2014 at 14:25, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
> And, yes, I'm talking about the first sysout data set in any job; Seen as
> jeSMSGLG in the DDname column in SDSF.
>
>
> By header and footer I mean all the messages in this log that which do *not*
> have a message identifier.
There can be a
On 11/26/2014 11:19 AM, Bob Shannon wrote:
I tend to agree with the OP. LLA will only check VLF for modules it previously
cached. Granted there may be some trimming, but I don't ever recall seeing less
than a 100% hit ratio for LLA. The other VLF exploiters behave differently and
the SMF stat
>Maybe JES2 Init and Tunning Reference/Guide. I got some hits searching on them.
That's what I thought, too. I've been searching MVS and JES2 messsages manuals
as well as some other JES books.
And, yes, I'm talking about the first sysout data set in any job; Seen as
jeSMSGLG in the DDname co
I just checked and it now lets me access the download information. So
ShopZseries appears to be working again.
Matthew
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 07:20:23 -0500, Richards, Robert B.
wrote:
>Thanks for confirming "it ain't just me!":-)
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Dis
Right next to the 750 kva generator?
In a message dated 11/26/2014 5:22:24 A.M. Central Standard Time,
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za writes:
When I'm big and rich, I want one of such toys and wire it up for z/OS,
but where oh where do I store that 27 ton thing? ;-)
---
Phil,
We also use IBM z/OS RDP, and although I haven't seen FTP "hangs", I have
noticed that when uploading lots of files that there are commonly errors
that require "retry". We found that if using the Ant FTP task, that
setting "retriesAllowed" fixed the problem. I would suggest that you
se
Google 'bit.listserv'.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Dazzo, Matt
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 11:21 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Archive search problems
>
> Dave, thanks that's awes
Dave, thanks that's awesome. Is there an index in google for all the listserv
groups?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 10:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
On 26 November 2014 at 10:00, Dazzo, Matt wrote:
> I am unable to search the archives because listserv.ua.edu keeps telling me
> to sign in, even though I am already signed in. I even changed my pw and
> confirmed it. But when I go to the archives and try to search I get the sign
> in screen an
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:17:15 -0600, Barry Merrill wrote:
>Our PASV experience with users uploading data files to us and
>downloading the (one) MXG Software file has been binary.
>
>At some sites PASV is required, or the transfer never initiates,
>while at other sites, enabling PASV causes the tran
Well played mr. Gould!
---
*Lucas Rosalen*
rosalen.lu...@gmail.com
+55 19 9-8146-7633
2014-11-26 14:44 GMT-02:00 Ed Gould :
> Thanks.
> However *I* was the one that raised
Thanks.
However *I* was the one that raised a SHARE requirement for forfmid. :)
Ed
On Nov 26, 2014, at 7:30 AM, Lucas Rosalen wrote:
To apply PTFs for a specific fmid:
//APPLYEXEC PGM=GIMSMP,PARM='DATE=U',REGION=0M
//SMPCSI DD DISP=SHR,DSN=your_csi
//SMPCNTL DD *
SET BDY (your_target)
>>VLF writes SMF 41 records, but they are unusable for LLA.
>That is not correct. It is true that LLA does know what it put into the cache
>(as would most VLF exploiters), but (as with all VLF exploiters) it has no
>idea what VLF has taken out due to trimming.
I tend to agree with the OP. LLA wi
>VLF writes SMF 41 records, but they are unusable for LLA.
>Since LLA manages its VLF cache and knows what is in it
>and what is not, it will always have a 100% hitratio on
>its VLF cache, which will be reported by VLF records 41.
That is not correct. It is true that LLA does know what it put i
Our PASV experience with users uploading data files to us and
downloading the (one) MXG Software file has been binary.
At some sites PASV is required, or the transfer never initiates,
while at other sites, enabling PASV causes the transfer to fail,
often with a BROKEN PIPE message after moving man
This is likely due to an intentional change in OA45768.
It was never documented that z/OS would delete entries from a PASN access
list for a deleted data space. Doing such deletion, in some cases, causes
problems that can be dealt with only by not having done the deletion.
A program relying on
In the absence of that, you can see everything here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/bit.listserv.ibm-main
I actually find it easier to use this than the archives.
_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Engineeri
I am unable to search the archives because listserv.ua.edu keeps telling me to
sign in, even though I am already signed in. I even changed my pw and confirmed
it. But when I go to the archives and try to search I get the sign in screen
and my pw is not accepted. The results are the same with Chr
Our nightly job to download PTFs also failed last night.
GIM69207S ** THE CONNECTION WITH THE SERVER FAILED. java.net.ConnectException:
EDC8128I Connection refused.
HTTP Server Error: 502 Bad Gateway
Connection attempt: 60, WAIT time remaining: 1 minute.
Will retry connection to the
Maybe JES2 Init and Tunning Reference/Guide. I got some hits searching on
them.
Lucas Rosalen
Em 26/11/2014 11:41, "Elardus Engelbrecht"
escreveu:
> Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>
> >I can't seem to remember what manual describes the header and footer
> messages in the JES2 JESMSGLG data set. Does anyo
Donald Likens wrote:
>I use CSVDYNEX to dynamically load an IEFU83 exit defined as AMODE31 (use
>system definition).
On what z/OS version? (At least on v1.13, that CSVDYNEX macro is only for AMODE
24 and 31.)
Please post your SAM and CSVDYNEX statements plus all keywords.
Groete / Greetings
E
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/11/25/Facebook-Can-t-Cite-Evidence-to-Support-Claims-of-U-S-Tech-Worker-Shortage-After-MSM-Finally-Challenges
Thanks,
Mark Regan, USNR-Ret, 1969-1991
<><
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>I can't seem to remember what manual describes the header and footer messages
>in the JES2 JESMSGLG data set. Does anyone know?
I as$$ume you are talking about the 'dataset' inside a job like these: JESJCL,
JESJCLIN, JESMSGLG, JESYSMSG.
Could you be kind to show us examp
How are you doing the add?
If you are giving it an address of code to use as opposed to a module
name, that may be the problem.
Based on what you posted here, I don;t believe it is griping about the
code doing the add. Its the module being added.
--Dave
On 11/26/2014 7:06 AM, Donald Li
To apply PTFs for a specific fmid:
//APPLYEXEC PGM=GIMSMP,PARM='DATE=U',REGION=0M
//SMPCSI DD DISP=SHR,DSN=your_csi
//SMPCNTL DD *
SET BDY (your_target) .
APPLY PTFS FORFMID (your_fmid)
GROUPEXTEND BYPASS(HOLDSYS) RETRY(YES) C(ALL)
.
Hope this is what you've been looking for.
Lucas Rosale
I also am having a problem with downloads from ShopzSeries. I wasn't on
IBM-MAIN yesterday. I started a PMR yesterday afternoon and got this relpy:
There was an issue reported that was making that message appear.
The internal teams have been working over the issue and it should be fixed
by now.
Cai Jin Song wrote:
>This system is a base sysplex,so we need to define CTCs between LPARs.
WAD
>We don't like to define CTCs.
Why?
>Is there any other way to implement base sysplex excepting CTC.
AFAIK, no.
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>Behalf Of John McKown
>Sent: 26 November, 2014 14:14
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Death of spinning disk?
>
>Well, maybe, according to:
>http://www.itworld.com/article/2851057/intel-a
I can't seem to remember what manual describes the header and footer messages
in the JES2 JESMSGLG data set. Does anyone know?
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to li
Well, maybe, according to:
http://www.itworld.com/article/2851057/intel-and-micron-are-going-to-kill-the-hard-disk-drive.html
According to this, Intel is thinking that 10Tb SSDs will be available in a
couple of years. From what I have read, despite the "wearing" problem, with
SSDs, one which is pr
I use CSVDYNEX to dynamically load an IEFU83 exit defined as AMODE31 (use
system definition). I have been working to move information above the 64 bit
bar and now have a problem I do not understand. As far as I can tell the last
SAM instruction issued is SAM31 (Set Amode to 31) before issuing th
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:53 AM, ibmmain wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> There are three LPARs in our SDM system in the same machine. We don't
> have any CF for this system
>
> This system is a base sysplex,so we need to define CTCs between LPARs.
>
> We don't like to define CTCs. Is there any other way t
Thanks for confirming "it ain't just me!" :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 7:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ShopzSeries problems?
Ok, gettin
Ok, getting a little further, site is really slow.
And then I get the same error as you:
ERROR: SHP0003E: An unexpected error occurred. Please try again later. If the
problem persists, please contact us (visit our Customer Service page for
contact information).
_
No problem. I was just able to get past the signon, and then after clicking "my
Orders" things grind to a halt.
_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Engineering
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 4954
Thanks Dave.
I can get in and see my "two" downloadable orders, but after clicking on
"Download"...nothing, followed a minute or two later by that SHP0003E message.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent:
I can't even get into the site this morning. I have an order that is still
downloadable, and was going to try that for you.
_
Dave Jousma
Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Engineering
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rap
Yesterday, I sent the email below and did not hear back from anyone.
Can someone confirm that Shopz "download" is working?
IBM acknowledged receipt of my reply to Customer Service but then silence.
I tried again this morning and still no joy.
Bob
From: Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Tuesday, Novemb
Hi all
There are three LPARs in our SDM system in the same machine. We don't have any
CF for this system
This system is a base sysplex,so we need to define CTCs between LPARs.
We don't like to define CTCs. Is there any other way to implement base sysplex
excepting CTC.
Thanks a lot!
Mike Schwab wrote:
>http://www.wired.com/2014/11/eniac-unearthed/
Very very interesting! Thanks Mike, for kindly sharing this entertaining
article.
When I'm big and rich, I want one of such toys and wire it up for z/OS, but
where oh where do I store that 27 ton thing? ;-)
Groete / Greetings
E
http://www.wired.com/2014/11/eniac-unearthed/
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@lis
Ok, ok, ok, I hate to post twice, but here goes... ;-)
Phil, more diagnostics things you can review:
What version of z/OS are you using?
Are you using IBM's TCP/IP software or another vendor's package?
DATACTTIME
FIFOIOTIME
Insert/remove TRACE and DEBUG statements.
Check your PROGxx parmlib m
45 matches
Mail list logo
