Ze'ev:
Because in most cases programmers are less than lets say bright. If
you bring up ASCII you will only confuse them. I suspect they will
try and use it in some sort of horrendous fashion, like convert to
ASCII and then back. To give you an idea how stupid programmers can
be a S0C7
The Wheelers wrote:
SONY 185tbyte last year not announced for mainframe.
You are correct. Sony did not announce that. It would be equally correct
and at least as relevant to point out that Sony also did not announce:
* a tape drive;
* completed tape media;
* attachment to any type of system of
Because in most cases programmers are less than lets say bright.
Oh, I see...
I guess that this is why my rate when I program in lowly Access VBA is higher
then anything COBOL programmers could get. I am not even trying to compare
that to my rate when I write Perl, T-SQL, PL/SQL, etc. They
Exactly. The OP is looking for a free ride. I will also point out that the book
is somewhat dated, and there have been improvements to JCL since (access to
system symbols, promotion of such to SYSIN, PARMDD, etc.).
Ant.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
In my case the only interrelatedness was that my thought - a record exit
on UNPACK - also related to AMATERSE.
So Peter was right to suggest it was the subject of a different RFE.
Cheers, Martin
From: Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 11/04/2015 23:34
I completed the survey without problems with Google Chrome.
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015, 04:14 Iris Rivera iriv...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Shane,
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I will do some research to
see if and how we can disable this message.
I appreciate your feedback.
to summarize the conversation:
I don't know what is scarer letting ASCII loose in the environment or
letting programmers know about it.
Not to alarm you further, but I believe it's already endemic.
Not in any company I have ever worked.
Why is getting an ASCII piece of information so scary?
Thank you all to those who've pointed me to NATIONAL-OF and DISPLAY-OF
intrinsic functions. For some reason I missed them when looking at the list of
intrinsic functions.
While calling the C runtime library is an interesting exercise, using native
COBOL functionality when in COBOL is superior.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I will do some research to see
if and how we can disable this message.
Cheers Iris, I doubt your survey partners will give a tuppenny damn about
people (such as I) who disable js.
I'm happy to remain on the fringes, and ignored by the mainstream.
I think I understand.
You run the DEFINE LOGSTREAM process but need to add a STORCLAS parm to it.
Is that correct?
If so, you need to add WRITE statements to your ACS code so you can see what
things look like before and after the section in the code you think should
be getting control.
It would
I am using a storage class routine, but it does not receive control for DEFINE
LOGSTREAM unless I explicitly specify a class - it seems to first go to a
storage volume.
What am I missing?
--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar
Sort of correct.
ACS routines will assign STORCLAS based upon the STORCLAS routine. If the
logger is allowed to override the STORCLAS and you have one specified for
the logstream, then the override is allowed.
Rob Schramm
On Apr 12, 2015 10:54 AM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote:
12 matches
Mail list logo
