Re: Create zIIP workload

On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:53:13 -0400, Peter Relson wrote: >Once properly licensed, I believe that there is very little of your own >code that you are not allowed to make zIIP eligible. > >The main thing that you are not allowed to do is to make someone else's >code zIIP-eligible (which includes

Re: Redirect or hide IEBCOPY output when using the TSO RECEIVE Command

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:34:13 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote: >At 09:51 -0500 on 10/25/2015, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about >Re: Redirect or hide IEBCOPY output when using the TSO RECE: > >>In , on 10/23/2015 >>at 09:25 PM, "Robert A. Rosenberg"

Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?

How does one handle a 1 hour back time change within a monoplex or sysplex. We have always had in issue with the SYS1 xcf , wlm and logr files and the fall time change. We just shutdown, wait one hour and come back up. I would like to see how others handle this! Tim Brown Sent from my

Re: 4-hour MSU rolling average

Thank you. That is the total capacity of the CEC, 28 on my machine. For SCRT purposes, I cap at 16. Is there a variable which I can look at to see how far under this cap I am, or when I am experiencing capping? > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?

I'm a developer, not an operations guy. My boss has asked me why a datacenter we use would need to IPL for the daylight to standard time transition. He asks if the box does not use UTC, and I said that yes, the hardware clock is generally set to UTC but that perhaps the LPAR time zone change

Re: 4-hour MSU rolling average

I use the following, which is similar to the REXX provided earlier in this thread (and liberally stolen from Mark Zelden). /* REXX */ CVT =

Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:28:14 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: > >Can anyone enlighten me? Why might our datacenter need or want to IPL for >the Daylight to Standard time conversion? > Atavistic applications. I doubt there's any such residue in the OS. -- gil

Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?

At 23:33 + on 10/26/2015, Chris Hoelscher wrote about Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?: We also shutdown for 1 hour - even oif there were no system issues (and I believe there are not) - our friends in development cannot tell us if there are any apps they rely

Re: (External):Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?

OP did not state whether GMT is set to UTC or local. I would have thought by now shops would have converted to UTC. I understand that the hit is much bigger for shops located in the Eastern Hemisphere because the change requires shutting down--once--for a prodigious period, but in the Western

Re: Redirect or hide IEBCOPY output when using the TSO RECEIVE Command

At 03:57 -0500 on 10/26/2015, Norbert Friemel wrote about Re: Redirect or hide IEBCOPY output when using the TSO RECE: On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:34:13 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote: At 09:51 -0500 on 10/25/2015, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about Re: Redirect or hide IEBCOPY output when

Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?

We also shutdown for 1 hour - even oif there were no system issues (and I believe there are not) - our friends in development cannot tell us if there are any apps they rely upon/depend upon/require a non-overlapping timing sequence (would a duplicate time violate any physical integrity(keys)

Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?

I've been wondering how long it would take for time-change questions to start. It's a little later this year. - -teD -   Original Message   From: Charles Mills Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 17:29 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Subject: RE-IPL for the

Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?

If you use local time and ESDS for logging (key is timestamp), you can't go backward in time and you have to be down that one hour a year. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Charles Mills wrote: > I'm a developer, not an operations guy. My boss has asked me why a > datacenter we

Re: (External):Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?

It is not *my* shop or our shop. It is a site to which we outsource certain processing. I do not know if the issue is that the hardware clock is set to local time.  CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity Original message From: J O Skip Robinson

Re: RE-IPL for the Daylight to Standard time conversion?

Ditto. Ed On Oct 26, 2015, at 6:33 PM, Chris Hoelscher wrote: We also shutdown for 1 hour - even oif there were no system issues (and I believe there are not) - our friends in development cannot tell us if there are any apps they rely upon/depend upon/require a non-overlapping timing

Re: (External):Re: Unicode Query

Lizette Koehler wrote: John, There are two flavors of COPYGROUP/COPYGRP with z/OS V2.1 Spot on. They say memory is the second thing to go; I'd quite forgotten the details and I wrote the announcement text about this function! Sorry about that, all. (Lizette, was Paul Harvey a relative?)

Re: Create zIIP workload

Awesome, thanks for all the info everyone, helpful as always. I don't know what the mainframe community would be without this list. Thanks and Regards, Leo -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tony Harminc Sent: Friday,

Re: Create zIIP workload

On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 20:18:39 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote: > >IBM also has rules (published following the Neon Systems legal action >a few years ago) that describe what workloads IBM allows to be run on >the various kinds of processors:

Re: Create zIIP workload

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 08:27:29 -0400, Tony Thigpen wrote: > >It has to do with how the other guy prices his software. For example, if >he is mips based on a specific box, and you then start running his >software on a much faster zIIP, he would be loosing revenue and the >customer could be in

Re: (External):Re: Unicode Query

John - Thank you ! That quip will be used to good effect Jerry Whitteridge Manager Mainframe Systems & Storage Albertsons - Safeway Inc. 925 738 9443 Corporate Tieline - 89443 If you feel in control you just aren't going fast enough. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion

Re: Create zIIP workload

Paul, It has to do with how the other guy prices his software. For example, if he is mips based on a specific box, and you then start running his software on a much faster zIIP, he would be loosing revenue and the customer could be in violation of the use agreement. Tony Thigpen Paul

Re: Shopz Receive Order failing this morning

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:56:56 +, Jousma, David wrote: >Tried both the primary (Boulder), and backup (Rochester), and both are failing: > >GIM44336S ** AN UNUSUAL CONDITION OCCURRED. GIMJVREQ - com.ibm.smp.GIMJVEXC: > com.ibm.smp.GIMJVEXC:

Re: Shopz Receive Order failing this morning

Thanks for confirming the problem appears to be on IBM's side Doug. I also saw the message you reported too. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Engineering david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 

Shopz Receive Order failing this morning

Tried both the primary (Boulder), and backup (Rochester), and both are failing: GIM44336S ** AN UNUSUAL CONDITION OCCURRED. GIMJVREQ - com.ibm.smp.GIMJVEXC: com.ibm.smp.GIMJVEXC: java.net.ConnectException: EDC8127I CONNECTION TIMED OUT. GIM69188S ** RECEIVE PROCESSING

Re: (External):Re: Unicode Query

No relation to Paul Harvey. If there was, I would have used And now for the rest of the story - Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of John Eells > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 7:37 AM > To:

IBM Redbooks | IBM z/OS V2R2: Serverpac

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpieces/abstracts/sg248500.html?Open -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN