This will be about the first nice thing I have ever said about KC! I got
into looking at the search option while researching a replacement for
LookAt. I have added this bookmark to my desktop:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/search/
If you start there you can find things pretty well
On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 03:00:15 -0500, David Cole wrote:
>...
>But if the worlds of Apples, PCs, iPhones, and Androids
>has show us anything at all,
>it has shown us that skins matter,
>and that UIs matter.
>
>IBM has a decades long history of releasing unpolished products
>and then polishing them up
On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 11:06:08 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
>I just tried something this morning. If you go to Knowledge Center search
>https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/search/ and type in a message
>number the first hit seems to be the entry in Messages and Codes. Hard to
>see how that is
I just tried something this morning. If you go to Knowledge Center search
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/search/ and type in a message
number the first hit seems to be the entry in Messages and Codes. Hard to
see how that is any less satisfactory than LookAt. Better in that it gives
I don't know of any overt sign of flash copy invocation, but for me there is
strong circumstantial evidence: lightning fast volume copy. We periodically
migrate maintenance via full DSS volume copy. Done this for years. Then one
time the copy job ran in only seconds instead of minutes. I
On 12/03/2016 07:58 AM, esmie moo wrote:
> Gentle Readers,
>
> I have a question about FLASHCOPY using ADRDSSU and COPY. In my first
> example I was told that the job is using FLASHCOPY. However I do not see any
> evidence.
>
> COPY FULL INDYNAM (SDB000) OUTDYNAM (MDB000) DUMPCONDITIONING
Gentle Readers,
I have a question about FLASHCOPY using ADRDSSU and COPY. In my first example
I was told that the job is using FLASHCOPY. However I do not see any evidence.
COPY FULL INDYNAM (SDB000) OUTDYNAM (MDB000) DUMPCONDITIONING
ADR101I (R/I)-RI01 (01), TASKID 001 HAS BEEN
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:58:40 +, Styles, Andy (SD EP zPlatform)
wrote:
>We're trying to put some security in place around JES2 NJE nodes, using the
>SIGNON=SECURE option (on the NODE statement). We've got it working RACF to
>RACF, but are having difficulty
[but] Seeing the grandchildren has higher priority on my money.
Absolutely!
At 12/2/2016 09:43 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
On 2 Dec 2016 14:30:01 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
dbc...@colesoft.com (David Cole) wrote:
Yep.
But Google does...
If I were willing to spend the dollars to go to
I will admit...
it is easier to be snarky against something anonymous
such as faceless development teams...
I tend to forget that there are real people
working hard to develop something
other people hopefully will like.
I got an email from one of the UI developers/testers.
Someone I may know.
10 matches
Mail list logo