> On Apr 21, 2017, at 9:35 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>
> In a prior life at a bank, we did a DR exercise at a vendor business recovery
> site. At the end, we were supposed to erase all the data we had restored. We
> did the RACF needful to erase on delete, started
It has been a little while working directly with SMS, but if your volumes in
the OVERFLOW storage group are in an ENABLE status then SMS will treat them the
same as the volumes in the SVCDUMP storage group. SMS will look for the best
"fit" for the dataset allocation. So if OVEFLOW has more
On 22/04/2017 1:20 AM, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
Is it naive to hope that Swift some could "replace" COBOL on z/OS? I'm not
clear on IBM's ideas of what Swift would be used for on z/OS.
There have been many attempts to replace COBOL over the years. Anybody
remember EGL? That was a flop. The
——SNIP--
> On Apr 21, 2017, at 1:49 PM, zMan wrote:
>
> Well, just connect them! That's a small price to pay for ensuring
> compliance with vendors' licenses!
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Edward
In a prior life at a bank, we did a DR exercise at a vendor business recovery
site. At the end, we were supposed to erase all the data we had restored. We
did the RACF needful to erase on delete, started some kind of 'delete all'
process, and went out to lunch. Came back a few hours later. It
I am working with a site, and their CICS COBOL compile procs include
DFHEXLI instead of DFHECI.
I thought DFHEXLI was only for batch programs using the external
interface link. But, there is not much information about it when I
google it.
Can DFHEXLI safely be used for "normal" CICS
'Forever' we have directed DUMPSRV SVC dumps via ACS routine to STORGRP
'SVCDUMP', which is defined to a small set of volumes called SVCDxx. We had a
(major) problem a while back when DB2/CICS wanted to take a humongous dump that
exceeded the available capacity of of the SVCDxx volumes. So we
Looks like it might be a good replacement for REXX. Not sure if its a good
replacement for COBOL...
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Mike Schwab
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 4:19 PM
To:
Lua for z/CPUs is very fast and very low cpu usage. http://lua4z.com/
Kind of a mini pascal.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
> I installed the beta and agree that in its current state it is not very
> useful, but I am encouraged by the
Actually, take the size of the maximum allocation on a volume (64K
tracks (non extended) or largest volume(extended)) and divide by 16
and use that for Primary / Secondary. Storage class can even extend
onto 59 volumes.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Paul Gilmartin
Bill,
I apologize for the oversight in parsing the dataset name. As soon as I
sent my earlier reply I realized that I did not cover all the scenarios
for the dataset name. If the HLQ is less than 6 bytes the parse would
grab the time which starts before the dataset name.
for example the
Thanks, Kolusu - that is better now! I will go and learn about HIT=NEXT, as
I have not run into that before.
Have a good weekend!
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
> Bill,
>
> You really don't need to complicate the control to get the desired
> results.
W dniu 2017-04-21 o 21:48, Tony Harminc pisze:
On 21 April 2017 at 15:09, R.S. wrote:
Regarding the "call home" method - I DONT LIKE IT!
Really, that's not good idea to enforce Internet connection just to perform
such an action. I would agree for HMC to
Bill,
You really don't need to complicate the control to get the desired
results. I have optimized your control cards a bit which would give you
the desired results
//SYSINDD *
OPTION COPY
INCLUDE COND=(1,003,CH,EQ,C'250',OR,
1,100,SS,EQ,C'.BIN ')
INREC
On 21 April 2017 at 15:09, R.S. wrote:
> Regarding the "call home" method - I DONT LIKE IT!
> Really, that's not good idea to enforce Internet connection just to perform
> such an action. I would agree for HMC to communicate, however I have no idea
> whether it's
Hi Kolusu, I think I messed up my original note by trying to keep the
characters in order.
I have attached a file that shows my JCL with input and output expected.
The current run, though has a problem with the Parse for %02 and %03. I
hope you can help me with this - it is probably simple.
This discussion has been going on for a while and it begs the question. How
many people/companies DR are their
Alternate/DR-CBU facility?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Porowski, Kenneth
Sent: Friday,
How about ...
One license key for the 'production use' with a 30 day grace period on the
licensed CEC(S).
One license key good for 30 days that will work on any CEC (no specific start
or end date)
It gives the vendor a guarantee that a licensed customer does not run for more
than 30-60 days
W dniu 2017-04-21 o 16:20, Wendell Lovewell pisze:
I work for a vendor, so I understand the necessity of making sure that licensed
products are used properly. But I also understand the inconvenience for both
the customer and the vendor of managing software keys.
I’m wondering what the list’s
Well, just connect them! That's a small price to pay for ensuring
compliance with vendors' licenses!
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Edward Gould
wrote:
> > On Apr 21, 2017, at 9:20 AM, Wendell Lovewell
> wrote:
> >
> > I work for a vendor, so
> On Apr 21, 2017, at 9:20 AM, Wendell Lovewell wrote:
>
> I work for a vendor, so I understand the necessity of making sure that
> licensed products are used properly. But I also understand the inconvenience
> for both the customer and the vendor of managing software
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:13:03 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
JCL has similar archaic restrictions. Why not code >
>BLKSIZE=0,SPACE=(100,50) -- (10 GB primary,
>> 5 GB secondary), amounts very reasonable with modern DASD, and > let the
>OS make the determination of blocks,
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:46:30 -0400, Bill Ashton wrote:
>
>Is there a way to not use ABSPOS=65, but instead to say I want to start
>following a space after Col 60? In Rexx, I could say to use the 10th word,
>but I don't want to change the SORT to Rexx now, as this input is doing a
>number of
Ok what you say is that we can do like the one below . is that what you are
referring ?
SITE BLOCKSIZE=0 LRECL=133 WRAP RECFM=FB PRI=20 SEC=10 CYL
put unix_file.txt 'HLQ.MAINFRAME.FILE(+1)' (replace
Thanks
Ron T
--
For
>>> JCL has similar archaic restrictions. Why not code >
BLKSIZE=0,SPACE=(100,50) -- (10 GB primary,
> 5 GB secondary), amounts very reasonable with modern DASD, and > let the
OS make the determination of blocks, tracks, or cylinders?
Paul,
May be use AVGREC ?
Bill,
Why bother about the position. From the looks of it, you need to pick the
last qualifier. So go find the last byte space and then subtract 12 bytes
to get to your dataset name.
something like this
//STEP0100 EXEC PGM=SORT
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SORTIN DD *
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 18:11:33 +, Nims,Alva John (Al) wrote:
>The closest you can get even in 2.02 is to use; BLKsize=### and BLocks .
>
Which goes against IBM's current recommendation to specify BLKSIZE=0
and to allow SDB to operate.
JCL has similar archaic restrictions. Why not code
Hello friends!
I just ran into a problem, and am a bit confused how to correct this.
I am reading the output of an FTP list command, and using SORT to capture
and format the FTP GET commands I need. This process is working fine for
the most part, and it produces the correct commands most of the
So going from a "windows" environment to mainframe - there is a difference with
record sizes.
The "windows" environment has long records. The file being created in the
mainframe side (and you should logon to the mainframe to view it in Option 3.4)
will have a fixed or VB record length that
You may wish to work with your z/OS Sysprogs on setting up GDGs with sufficient
size. Then a +1 dataset can be created without the need to delete/allocate
process. The GDG can have a limit of 1 or other to accommodate your needs.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe
Ok . i tried to copy a csv file that is there in the shell and i am getting the
below message . I tried increasing the LRECL of the PDS file and still the same
issue . Any idea on what could be the issue here ?
$ cp -T SN_ASC00_03212017.csv "//'ng772pt.X.Y.Z'"
cp: FSUM6260 write error on file
I installed the beta and agree that in its current state it is not very useful,
but I am encouraged by the effort and hopeful that we'll see some useful
features "soon".
Is it naive to hope that Swift some could "replace" COBOL on z/OS? I'm not
clear on IBM's ideas of what Swift would be
Unless your stg admins on the mainframe side say there is a limitation, there
is probably no limitation.
In my shop, we allow as many files as the users want to send up to the
mainframe and in various sizes from small (1tk) to huge >4gb. The SMS code
will handle the files locations to the
Ok , in that case if on the mainframe side has a file system setup , then they
can send the file and from there we can copy back a PDS location.
I need to understand whether there is any limitation on the number of files
send or any memory constraints ? is that the best approach ?
I am new
The CPU/L field is showing you two things: CPU utilization from z/OSes
point of view, and the CPU utilization from PR/SM's point of view. You had
the system capped, and were using all of the resources that were available
to you at the z/OS level. That's what the 100 means. z/OS was using all of
Fair trade? You're thinking like a vendor :) It's been shown time and
time again (at least in the Windows "shareware" world) that all
call-home does is upset your most loyal, paying customers, while getting
absolutely nothing from the folks who have no intention of ever paying a
cent for the
VS1
-Original Message-
>From: Anthony Fletcher
>Sent: Apr 15, 2017 10:36 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: Mainframe operating systems?
>
>I was the SYSPROG in its later stages before moving on to TSO using TCAM
>which was a disaster to start with.
>
The 'phone home' is an interesting idea but would have to be via a secure
communication protocol (we do not allow non-secure FTP but do support secure
FTP). Some shops wouldn't allow the 'phone home' so there must be an allowance
for those customers.
Ideally some vendor could open source such
And how would implementing SCRT solve what I see as a vendor's two most
pressing concerns that are often addressed with "keys":
- Is this or some other customer running this product on some CPU that we
have no knowledge about?
- This customer has been running a "30-day" trial of our product for
I work for a vendor, so I understand the necessity of making sure that licensed
products are used properly. But I also understand the inconvenience for both
the customer and the vendor of managing software keys.
I’m wondering what the list’s response would be toward implementing a system
I used to find the term "job pack" to be confusing. It's not quite as specific
a "thing" as STEPLIB or the LPA. It's simply "everything you already loaded."
(And yes, you could criticize the precision of that statement, but you get the
idea.)
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM
On 4/21/2017 3:45 AM, Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA) wrote:
Logical, practical, thus it will never happen. But one can hope.
Many ISVs (including Phoenix) have been pushing for this for years. We
put code into (E)JES to register/deregister with IFAEDREG back in 2006
in hopes that it would appear on
On 21/04/2017 9:41 PM, David W Noon wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 21:22:04 +0800, David Crayford (dcrayf...@gmail.com)
wrote about "LLVM ( wasRe: Swift on z/OS (was Data/hiperspaces (was: ...
4G bar?))" (in ):
[snip]
IBM have ported LLVM/clang to
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 21:22:04 +0800, David Crayford (dcrayf...@gmail.com)
wrote about "LLVM ( wasRe: Swift on z/OS (was Data/hiperspaces (was: ...
4G bar?))" (in ):
[snip]
> IBM have ported LLVM/clang to z/OS. The beta of swift gives the game away
I
IBM have ported LLVM/clang to z/OS. The beta of swift gives the game away
DOC:/u/doc: >swiftc --version
Swift version 3.0-dev (LLVM , Clang , Swift )
Target: s390x-ibm-zos
Interestingly they have a libbsd.a static library which appears to be a
shim of the the BSD C/C++ runtime library.
Right
Refrain: The "new tools" are neither as reliable, available or functional as
their predecessors.
IBM should be embarrassed.
Trying to get the z/OS Init and Tuning Reference on the Interweb, and KC is
throwing 403: Authentication Failed messages. To quote General
Beringer: "After very
Tom Marchant wrote:
>Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>>What if I specify VOL=SER because the catalog is momentarily unavailable but
>>I'm desperate to save the data?
>Why would the catalog be "momentarily unavailable"?
Catalog may be broken or too big to add a new catalog entry. (Or someone
initialized
Going back to your original question, I think a reasonable UACC for BRODCAST
would be NONE. This is because all "normal access", ie writing and reading, is
handled under the covers by the SEND and LISTBC commands.
Even with user logs, the likelihood is that the id sending the message is not
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:12:25 +, Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
wrote:
>You don't mention what you want to use it for, but with SMS managed datasets
>part of the problem was eliminated, because SMS
>managed datasets automatically get an EOF. You can't anymore simply
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 18:36:57 +0530, Jake Anderson wrote:
>Regarding Job pack area - Is this something we place the load module in any
>dataset or load into a particular memory for the search order to pick ?
Job Pack Area is simply the modules that have already been loaded into
your address
>First point says about Run time library services - Is there any example
>when we make use of this ?
This functionality no longer exists in z/OS.
>Regarding Job pack area - Is this something we place the load module in
any
>dataset or load into a particular memory for the search order to pick
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:08:38 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>For an SMS-managed DSN, what if I specify DISP=(NEW), but not CATLG. Does it:
>o catalog it regardless?
If you specify (NEW,KEEP) for an SMS-managed data set, it is cataloged.
>o fail with invalid parameter combination?
No. That would
>I have never realized it I had uaed JPA, might be at the address space
level ?
The JPA is not something you build, or prepare in an way.
When a load module is searched for, the system first looks in the current
address space to sdee if a usable copy of that load module has already been
I found it:
"(a,b) = session" (in quotes) works,
Kees.
> -Original Message-
> From: Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
> Sent: 20 April, 2017 13:49
> To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List'
> Subject: RE: Editmacro, am I in VIEW or EDIT?
>
> Thanks,
> Kees.
>
> >
You don't mention what you want to use it for, but with SMS managed datasets
part of the problem was eliminated, because SMS managed datasets automatically
get an EOF. You can't anymore simply allocate a dataset and start reading the
old data on the tracks.
Kees.
> -Original Message-
Logical, practical, thus it will never happen. But one can hope.
--
Lionel B. Dyck
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Timothy Sipples
Sent:
I have been looking into the Erase on Scratch capability to erase all extents
of a data set but much of my research indicates that:
1. You must set up the data set names individually.
2. It will not erase &Temp data set names unless you:
a. Make the &TEMP name a permanent name.
b. Map
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
> Sent: 20 April, 2017 12:35
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Editmacro, am I in VIEW or EDIT?
>
> (A,B) = SESSION
>
Benjamin, can you help me again?
Hi Liz
I have never realized it I had uaed JPA, might be at the address space
level ?
On Apr 21, 2017 2:10 PM, "Lizette Koehler" wrote:
> Have you reviewed the Init and Tuning manual that was suggested?
>
> The process of selection for load modules is specific to your
Have you reviewed the Init and Tuning manual that was suggested?
The process of selection for load modules is specific to your shop. You should
determine when you want processes to use STEPLIBs(for example the compile
process could be setup for steplibs to compile programs)
Whether production
60 matches
Mail list logo