>Ouch. I never saw Walt's proviso mentioned in the doc. Yes, these nodes are
>all totally under our control. However each node (sysplex) constitutes a
>different business environment supported by a different RACF data base. A
>person may have the same userid on sandbox and on production, but the
I would definitively open a PMR with IBM.
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Whenever I look at CAS abends: If the offset is close, and the symptoms match,
then I usually find the apar as matching close enough 106c vs 1070 - to me it
is close enough
Do you know if the symptoms in the apar are what was going on when the S0C4
occurred?
That would be the only way to kno
Is this same case with this as the offset value differs ..?
On 01-Mar-2018 10:39 AM, "Lizette Koehler" wrote:
> I would go into IBMLINK and use the module name and FMID In the search
>
> IGG0CLFG HDZ1D10
>
> You may come across APAR . OA45158
>
>
> Lizette
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> >
I would go into IBMLINK and use the module name and FMID In the search
IGG0CLFG HDZ1D10
You may come across APAR . OA45158
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28
This is going to be an issue.
z/OS V1.13 is way off support. You could open a PMR/SR but IBM could only look
to see if there were any apars for that specific issue.
Have you looked in IBMLINK to see if there are any apars that match your issue?
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: I
Hi
One of our schedule Job abended with below
ABEND0C4 IGG0CLGF +106C FMID=HDZ1D10 MAINT=UA68225
We are at zOS 1.13
Not able to find a Google hit on the above offset
Anyone have faced a similar issue ?
Peter
--
For IBM-MAIN
Ouch. I never saw Walt's proviso mentioned in the doc. Yes, these nodes are all
totally under our control. However each node (sysplex) constitutes a different
business environment supported by a different RACF data base. A person may have
the same userid on sandbox and on production, but they do
For HSM tapes we use HSM RECYCLE and have automation running the process
For all other tapes we use CA COPYCAT.
We have specialty tapes that have other processes for copy
1) SAR tapes need some changes to go to new VTS
2) SMS code needs to be setup to the new VTS and then set any request from
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 18:21:03 -0500, Tom Conley
wrote:
>I ran these on 1/5/18 to fix this check:
>
>RDEFINE RACFVARS &RACLNDE UACC(NONE) OWNER()
>RALTER RACFVARS &RACLNDE ADDMEM() (add one for each
>node)
>SETROPTS CLASSACT(RACFVARS) RACLIST(RACFVARS)
You should be careful with that, Tom. &RAC
John,
If you happen to have IBM File Manager for z/OS it will allow you to copy
messages in a queue to a data set. With File Manager you can also view/edit
messages in a queue and optionally have the messages formatted based on the
layout defined in a COBOL copybook.
Regards,
Peter Van Dyke (HCL)
I have forgotten how to direct the output of a z/OS channel trace to a file.
Can someone refresh my mind?
Thanks
Ken
Kenneth A. Bloom
Avenir Technologies Inc
/d/b/a Visara International
203-984-2235
bl...@visara.com
www.visara.com
---
I did the same thing but get new complaints:
IAZH104I Informational messages issued by IRRNJECK
IAZH105I None of the input node names are matched by a NODES class
profile with a UACC greater than READ.
On 2/28/2018 2:37 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
APAR OA49171 introduces a new health check called JES_NJE_SECURITY . I understand
the motivation for it but I can't figure out how to satisfy the check's
requirements. There's plenty of write-up available, but there lots of IFs and BUTs.
Furthermo
We first ran across this on our sandbox lpars. After looking through the stuff
you needed to do we just disabled the check.
Thanks..
Paul Feller
AGT Mainframe Technical Support
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Allan
I just disabled the check. I have no external NJE connections.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 1:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Health Check JES_NJE_SEC
APAR OA49171 introduces a new health check called JES_NJE_SECURITY . I
understand the motivation for it but I can't figure out how to satisfy the
check's requirements. There's plenty of write-up available, but there lots of
IFs and BUTs. Furthermore, there's reference to the &RACLNDE profile in
For Y2K preparation I remember installing a COBOL source scanning
program for the application folks. I thought it was interesting for a
couple of reasons:
1) It was licensed by the number of source code lines you ran through
it, and would just stop until you bought more "lines".
2) After re
Brian Westerman wrote, in part:
>What collateral damage is cause by a vendor's use of keys in their software?
>The keys are there to "lock" the software to the system it was licensed for.
>If the software is moved, or used in other creative means without permission
>from the vendor (who we mus
hum -
something I found in publically available doc
CA Copycat Utility Features CA Copycat Utility is designed to copy data from
tape to tape while retaining the information in the CA 1 Tape Management
Catalog (TMC) or in the CA TLMS Volume Master File (VMF) regarding data set
attributes and
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:
The foregoing message (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic
Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. sections 2510-2521, and is CONFIDENTIAL.
If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, do not read it. If you
are not the intended recipient, you a
On 2018-02-28 01:51, Brian Westerman wrote:
This is exactly the reason we decided that our software would always be sent
with the keys for that particular site embedded into the software, there are no
separate steps necessary to install the keys. It actually provides us with
another advantage
Last I recall we had HSM tapes in our Silo circa 1995, IIRC, those tapes were
copied outside the SILO using COPYCAT, DFDSS dump tapes also.
also we were also able to copy CATIA backup tapes with no issues
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Elardus Engelbrecht"
To: IBM-MAIN
PINION, RICHARD W. wrote:
>One thing to keep in mind, you cannot use IEBGENER or IDCAMS to copy ADRDSSU
>(DFDSS) or FDR dump tapes. You must use the appropriate copy utility,
>COPYDUMP for ADRDSU and FDRTCOPY for FDR.
Damn! Do you have to lead the OP away from this minefield or road full of
p
One thing to keep in mind, you cannot use IEBGENER or IDCAMS to copy ADRDSSU
(DFDSS) or FDR dump tapes. You must use the appropriate copy utility, COPYDUMP
for ADRDSU and FDRTCOPY for FDR.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Besides IEBGENER and DITTO there is not much out there. However, when we did a
conversion from physical tape to virtual tape (VTS) we used FATSCOPY, a product
by INNOVATIONS. It is an excellent product and very safe to use. We didn't
lose not even 1 tape. I highly recommend it (if you are sho
long ago I was involved in a project to electronically eject tapes from a STK
4400 silo, it was much easier to copy the tapes not used in X amount of days
than to eject them, also real to virtual later on, I used CA-COPYCAT because if
you have CA-1 or TLMS it makes sure it copied all the dataset
In my experience; an upgrade with the same serial number means they upgrade the
box you already have. This requires hours of downtime and no time to test on
the upgraded box. (also; no fallback)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signo
venkat kulkarni wrote:
>We are in the process of migrating physical tape to virtual tape.
Careful, this is not for fainthearted. ;-)
>I am unable to find any process and JCL which can copy all my data residing in
>physical tape cartridge to virtual tape using JCL .
I have a lot of questions:
It is my understanding that you are not referring to HCD, as you already
done that with the new mainframe (KG). From the HMC you just to copy the
file, update it and load it again. Do not forget POR.
ITschak
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Gadi Ben-Avi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to export
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 6:11 AM, Jantje. wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 12:04:29 -0600, John McKown <
> john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >books, does anyone know of an IBM supplied program that I can use which
> >will "unload" the messages in a QUEUE to a data set? Something like:
>
> I thi
For dataset copy use IEBGENER.
However presumably you have some tape management system and/or HSM.
For HSM data set up the environment and start recycle process.
For other datasets there are tools which help to update RMM or other TMS
database, but it will not necessarily solve all the issues wit
Hi,
Is there a way to export the OS definitions from and IODF, make bulk changes
and then import the changed definitions back into the IODF?
I am using z/OS v2.1
Thanks
Gadi
? ?? ? ?? ??? ??? ?? ? ??? ??
??. ?? , ?? ??? ?,
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 12:04:29 -0600, John McKown
wrote:
>books, does anyone know of an IBM supplied program that I can use which
>will "unload" the messages in a QUEUE to a data set? Something like:
I think you will want to install the MQ Explorer (use version 7 or 8, it will
connect to your ve
There are two sides of the coin.
One one side customers violate license conditions intentionally and
unintentionally.
The other side is legal customers sometimes do have problems with the key.
What's more annoying sometimes key code and expiration dates are use as
part of "negotiation process"
Which VTL are you using?
Ken
Kenneth A. Bloom
Avenir Technologies Inc
/d/b/a Visara International
203-984-2235
bl...@visara.com
www.visara.com
> On Feb 28, 2018, at 5:19 AM, venkat kulkarni
> wrote:
>
> Hello Group,
>
> We are in the process of migrating physical tape to virtual tape.
>
>
CA-COPYCAT is wonderful, it includes copying all the tape administration info.
It is free if you have a CA-1 license.
Grtn,
Kees.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of venkat kulkarni
> Sent: 28 February, 2018 10:20
> T
Hello Group,
We are in the process of migrating physical tape to virtual tape.
I am unable to find any process and JCL which can copy all my data residing
in physical tape cartridge to virtual tape using JCL .
Can you please suggest .
Regards
Venkat
Hi John,
1064 subscribers at mqser...@listserv.meduniwien.ac.at mailing list.
And there are some experienced MVS MQers.
Hope this helps.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 01:23:37PM -0600, John McKown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Mark Regan wrote:
>
> > John,
> >
> > There is a MQ users web
39 matches
Mail list logo
