I do? You must be joking. The thread is monopolized by one person. You know
who.
ITschak
בתאריך יום ב׳, 3 ביוני 2019, 0:47, מאת Bill Johnson <
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>:
> He’s trying to sell his company’s security services. Something I thought
> was not allowed on this
He’s selling plain and simple. So is Mugzak. Some laboratory bs that he will
even show you in application code. Then no doubt analyze your application code
for a small (large) fee. Nobody is saying the mainframe is fool proof. But, it
is inherently (by design) more secure than any other
Provided you have the appropriate authorities...
Batch job:
//jobcard
//SDSFCMD EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSPROC DD DISP=SHR,DSN=Your.REXX.library
//SYSTSIN DD *
%SDSFCMD D GRS,RES=(*,SYS1.LINKLIB)
/*
SDSFCMD REXX:
/*REXX*/
blah = ISFCALLS('ON')
ISFCONS =
[Default] On 2 Jun 2019 14:46:41 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Bill Johnson) wrote:
>Hes trying to sell his companys security services. Something I thought was
>not allowed on this list.
>
Whether or not he is selling something and I don't read
On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 21:19:28 +, Mike Schwab wrote:
>Would the XML parser create and read the necessary structure? If not,
>I think it could be modified for the different syntax needed.
>
I suppose an associative array could be represented by a B-tree and COBOL
could support B-trees. SMOP.
Operator command D IPLINFO,MSTRJCL
Ant.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Marchant
Sent: Friday, 31 May 2019 12:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: master JCL
On Wed, 29 May 2019 22:10:23 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>Hello listers,
>
If there is interest in understanding "what was the IPL-time MSTJClxx
parmlib member and from which data set", the syslog has that information,
such as
IEE252I MEMBER MSTJCL02 FOUND IN SYS2.PARMLIB
and
IEFJ200I MASTER SCHEDULER JCL FOR THIS IPL TAKEN FROM MEMBER MSTJCL02 OF
PARMLIB
Peter
He’s trying to sell his company’s security services. Something I thought was
not allowed on this list.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Sunday, June 2, 2019, 4:04 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> * As part of a APF authorized product there is a SVC or PC routine
> that when called will
Would the XML parser create and read the necessary structure? If not,
I think it could be modified for the different syntax needed.
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 9:13 PM Clark Morris wrote:
>
> [Default] On 28 May 2019 09:51:13 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
> sme...@gmu.edu (Seymour J Metz) wrote:
>
[Default] On 28 May 2019 09:51:13 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
sme...@gmu.edu (Seymour J Metz) wrote:
>The Sun is hot. ADDRESS LINKMVS is not relevant to the REXX support in SDSF,
>which does something that ADDRESS LINKMVS does not address. Until such time as
>COBOL supports associative
> * As part of a APF authorized product there is a SVC or PC routine
>that when called will turn on the JSBCAUTH bit
Ouch!
If it's APF authorized then why does it need to do that? And why would you
allow such a vendor in the door?
Did you have a tool that discovered that the vendor's SVC
You're missing the point: there is no such SVC in the dispute. What is at issue
is the ability to detect key zero code that turns on JSCBAUTH, not the ability
to install trap doors.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM
Sory to inform you: there are such SVCs available for download. I think
there is one on the cbttape .
בתאריך יום א׳, 2 ביוני 2019, 22:33, מאת Seymour J Metz :
> > We look for such SVC
>
> There is no "such SVC". What is under discussion is code that runs
> legitimately in key zero tuning on
> We look for such SVC
There is no "such SVC". What is under discussion is code that runs legitimately
in key zero tuning on JSCBAUTH, not an SVC that does that.
IMHO, for 3rd party vendor that requires APF to use that to turn on JSCBAUTH
is grossly irresponsible, and I'd love for you to
What do you mean by "semi authorized?
I do remember IBM having a dangerous SVC to let ISPF run IEBCOPY, but hasn't
that been fixed long since?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Allocation doesn't ENQ datasets for Master, but there are lots of other
resources that Master can ENQ. That doesn't help the OP, since its the dataset
ENQs that he needs.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe
What are GQSCAN, ISGECA and ISGQUERY, chopped liver?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2019
On 6/2/2019 9:16 AM, Steve Horein wrote:
I think my disappoint lies in that IBM, a leading tech company that
provides IT services, outsources this service.
I am guessing that it is cheaper for IBM, but I had always thought of IBM
in terms of striving for quality and not cost.
If IBM is
We’re wading into the HMC System Monitor app in order to get additional alerts
for significant events. Unfortunately we can’t figure how to get beyond Square
1. It goes like this.
On HMC task list, select Monitor System Events, which shows this list of
'permitted objects': Adapters,
I think my disappoint lies in that IBM, a leading tech company that
provides IT services, outsources this service.
I am guessing that it is cheaper for IBM, but I had always thought of IBM
in terms of striving for quality and not cost.
On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 20:02:04 -0500 Paul Gilmartin
<000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
:>On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 21:07:40 +0300, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
:>
:>>On Fri, 31 May 2019 16:32:13 + willie bunter wrote:
:>>
:>>:>Would anybody have an example to run the GRS command for the
21 matches
Mail list logo
