On 2019-09-27 12:32 PM, Jon Perryman wrote:
JavaScript OO was specifically designed around DOM.
What language features do you believe have anything to do with DOM?
If you've used javascript, you will have noticed it doesn't have "CLASS". The
functionality exists but not in a way OO
Hello Radoslaw,
SMS will catalog in the MASTER CATALOG. It does override the access rules. It
really is important that ALIAS entries are defined for any GROUP or USER
created. If the USER has access to create the dataset then SMS will catalog
that dataset. I have plenty of evidence to this.
On Thursday, September 26, 2019, 01:15:42 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>> You are referring to XML parse tree.
> Not even close. What are you smoking?
After looking at Perl's HTML5 DOM which came out this year, I stand corrected.
Apparently, people are willing to put a lot of effort and
On 2019-09-27 2:05 AM, Jon Perryman wrote:
On Wednesday, September 25, 2019, 02:44:14 AM PDT, David Crayford wrote:
Are you talking about the DOM? The definition of OO typically refers to
languages that support polymorphism, inheritance and encapsulation. HTML
is basically a markup
On 2019-09-26 19:07, Jon Perryman wrote:
Seriously! The most sophisticated C macro possible is "#DEFINE MYMAC B C D ". Calling the macro
"A MYMAC Y" results in "A B C D E". Additional macro substitution could occur for B, C
or D if they exist. How is this anything more than copy?
C/C++
On Thursday, September 26, 2019, 12:31:23 PM PDT, Seymour J Metz
wrote:
> The definition of macro has never been the same as copy.
Seriously! The most sophisticated C macro possible is "#DEFINE MYMAC B C D ".
Calling the macro "A MYMAC Y" results in "A B C D E". Additional macro
Somehow I deleted the text of my reply. The significance of 1440 has nothing to
do with the clock cycle; it's the number of minutes in a day.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
DOM is not HTML, it's a representation of HTML files. HTML doesn't have
classes.
Your analogy is bogus. The C preprocessor is defined in the same document as
the rest of the language; that's not the case with DOM, HTML and JavaScript.
And server side scripts were available outside of Netscape
> You are referring to XML parse tree.
Not even close.
What are you smoking?
> Even Nodejs parses uses the XML parser instead of the HTML parser.
There is no "the XML parser" or "the HTML parser"; there are many HTML and XML
parsers.
> JavaScript OO was specifically designed around DOM.
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019, at 19:36, Jon Perryman wrote:
> Was the definition of
> "macro" always the same as "copy"?
No. Perhaps you should read through:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macro_(computer_science)
and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General-purpose_macro_processor
An early far from
That's Seymour.
I don't know what you consider to be the "current" definition, but the first
hit that I got ha nothing to do with copy books., nor do macros in C.
Google for, e.g., #def, #if.
The definition of macro has never been the same as copy.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
On Wednesday, September 25, 2019, 07:05:47 PM PDT, Clark Morris wrote:
>> Copy books cam in with Jovial, well before 1970.
>> Assemblers had COPY instructions in the 1960s.
>> PL/I had the %INCLUDE statement in the 1960s. By 1970 it was old hat.
> COBOL D on DOS/360 had copybooks in 1966 or
On Wednesday, September 25, 2019, 11:13:19 AM PDT, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> The format of an HTML parse tree constructed by,
> e.g., a Perl program, is not compatible with JavaScript.
You are referring to XML parse tree. HTML parse tree's do not exist outside web
browsers. Even Nodejs parses
Using struct in the cast resolved the issue
Where buffer char[1200]
Where struct record
{
...
...
};
Struct record *recordptr;
recordptr = (struct record *)
> On Sep 26, 2019, at 1:11 PM, retired mainframer
> wrote:
>
> Maybe you would like to show us some real code?
>
>>
On Wednesday, September 25, 2019, 02:44:14 AM PDT, David Crayford wrote:
> Are you talking about the DOM? The definition of OO typically refers to
> languages that support polymorphism, inheritance and encapsulation. HTML
> is basically a markup language.
I'm talking about the DOM
Maybe you would like to show us some real code?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Joseph Reichman
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 8:40 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: casting with XL C\C++ compiler
>
> Hi
>
> Seems like a lot
The first bit of guidance is ... Don't Do That!!
I could not quite figure out what you meant, but this compiled for me with no
errors
struct S
{
int i;
};
void X()
{
S * p;
char Buffer[1000];
p = (S *) Buffer;
p = reinterpret_cast(Buffer);
// no way static_cast will
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:40:17 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>
>Seems like a lot the casting I was able to do with the Visual Studio C\C++
>compiler I am not able to do with XL C\C++ compiler>
>
>A specific case struct * pointer the I would like to assign a char[1200]
>via Struct pointer *
>
Hi
Seems like a lot the casting I was able to do with the Visual Studio C\C++
compiler I am not able to do with XL C\C++ compiler
A specific case struct * pointer the I would like to assign a char[1200]
via Struct pointer *
Buffer char[1200]
pointer = (pointer) generates an
Yes, SVC 51 was type 4, and, no, it did not have a WTG table. The transient
area in OS/360 was 1 KiB; in OS/VS1 it was 2 KiB and there were no transient
areas in OS/VS2.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Lindy Mayfield
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 10:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Control block values that exempt 522
Anyone know if there is a DB2LUW forum like this one...thanks
Dean Nai
>
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I found the old post! I think it has most what I need. I didn't find it
before, but now I did, I should have looked harder, mea culpa.
/lindy
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Massimo Biancucci
Sent: torstai 26. syyskuuta 2019 18.05
To:
Not funny. ☹
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Beaver
Sent: torstai 26. syyskuuta 2019 18.05
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Control block values that exempt 522 Timeouts
EXTERNAL
Talk to your MVS people
-Original Message-
Hi,
I think you gave the main answer
TIME=1440 (or NOLIMIT) on JCL.
AFAIK, there're monitor product (like BMC SYSPROG Services for instance)
that can update the value on the fly.
Regards.
Max
Il giorno mar 17 set 2019 alle ore 15:09 Lindy Mayfield <
lindy.mayfi...@sas.com> ha scritto:
>
Talk to your MVS people
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lindy Mayfield
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 9:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Control block values that exempt 522 Timeouts
It could have
It could have been hardware related based on clock speed on early machines.
Perhaps it's more appropriate ask this on the RACF group.
/Lindy
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mike Schwab
Sent: tiistai 17. syyskuuta 2019 18.35
To:
Allan,
Replacing UACC with ID(*) access is not best practice in every case. If, as Tom
suggested, you put entries in the Global Access Table (GAT) for the catalogs,
as I too would recommend, such entries allow the equivalent of UACC access. To
ensure consistency, I prefer to set profile UACCs
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:22:25 -0500, Giliad Wilf wrote:
>Well, SVC51 is a type-4 SVC and was comprised of several IGCnn05A pieces.
>I think there was a limit for the size of a single piece back at MVT R21 days,
>of 1K, or maybe 2K and it had to fit into something called "transient area".
>You
Billy,
it was a bit challenging and I'm not 100% sure it's so generalized .
you've real file, try and let us know.
Here a stream who (in theory) does the needed, I've left different useless
output but understanding the flow:
W dniu 2019-09-26 o 06:27, Bruce Hewson pisze:
Hello Sean,
SMS managed datasets must be cataloged. And if there is no ALIAS and the
dataset is allocated, SMS WILL catalog the dataset in the MASTER CATALOG no
matter what the security rules.
[...]
IMHO SMS-managed dataset will NOT be
31 matches
Mail list logo
