Frank Swarbrick wrote:
>The SWIFT payments network has a field called the UETR
>(Unique End-to-end Transaction Reference), which is a
>Version 4 UUID. Will the new Enterprise COBOL feature
>be able to generate a Version 4 UUID?
You can already generate version 4 UUIDs via INVOKE to a small --
Execute a DFDSS restore with a PARM='TYPRUN=NORUN' on the exec card.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, November 13, 2019 8:42 PM,
Is there a DSS function to list the contents of the backup? We were FDR and it
was straight forward.
In a message dated 11/13/2019 6:59:32 PM Central Standard Time,
retired-mainfra...@q.com writes:
The error has nothing to do with labels. DFDSS processed 32 blocks of data and
reported a
[Default] On 13 Nov 2019 16:05:58 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
frank.swarbr...@outlook.com (Frank Swarbrick) wrote:
>Do you have any reason to believe that CBLQDA(ON) is ever used in your shop?
>If CBLQCA is not already set to ON as default in your shop it seems unlikely
>to me that anyone
The error has nothing to do with labels. DFDSS processed 32 blocks of data and
reported a problem when reading the 33rd.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson
> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 4:18 PM
> To:
It looks like the Enterprise PL/I UID BIF only generates a Version 5 UUID.
The SWIFT payments network has a field called the UETR (Unique End-to-end
Transaction Reference), which is a Version 4 UUID. Will the new Enterprise
COBOL feature be able to generate a Version 4 UUID?
Here's the
Reminds me of the original STK RVA, before IBM got involved with the microcode.
The box would crash, and all of the data disappeared. And there was no way to
recover it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, November 13,
Mike,
Absolutely, a lot of real creative people not just nerds.
Scott
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:55 PM Mike Schwab wrote:
> https://www.huffpost.com/entry/composing-code-why-musici_b_10714288
>
> And many other articles.
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:23 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> >
> > I
Unlikely to be your problem, but we actually had the following scenario
recently. We use 'STK' virtual tape VSMx. After a system crash of some sort, we
got the ubiquitous warning to 'run a tape audit'. We've seen this message for
years. Somehow it was overlooked in this case, and no 'audit' was
Do you have any reason to believe that CBLQDA(ON) is ever used in your shop?
If CBLQCA is not already set to ON as default in your shop it seems unlikely to
me that anyone is setting it explicitly somewhere. But I only have my own shop
to go by, so who knows...
Hi Tom, thanks for the reply.
The specific problem I am trying to address is whether or not in the startup
code for an application-wide utility subroutine I can safely test for the
presence of a COBOL OPTIONAL output file used only for certain event-specific
processing. If CBLQDA is ON then I
Only way to find out is run TAPEMAP on INDD1 VOLSER.
In a message dated 11/13/2019 5:11:20 PM Central Standard Time,
dean@doit.nh.gov writes:
ADR012I (SCH)-DSSU (01), 2019.317 14:11:07 DFSMSDSS PROCESSING COMPLETE.
HIGHEST RETURN CODE IS 0008 FROM:
TASK 001
>Is it possible for a COBOL program to dynamically detect if LE option CBLQDA
> is active?
Not easily...but I would be surprised if it is different for different programs
in the same region. You can run a program with RPTOPTS(ON) to get an "options
in effect" report from LE. You could search
Since the JCL specified the volser, why do you think the catalog was used at
all?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo
> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 12:57 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: DFDSS backup retore
>
>
Sorry about that. I was just making up a tape number. The actual number was the
one the list cat stated.
Dean Nai
On 11/13/19, 4:24 PMEST, "IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Bill
Bishop (TMNA)"
wrote:
> EXTERNAL: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you
Sorry, late to the game.
Thought it was the serial number mis-matched.
Thanks
Bill Bishop
Consultant, Mainframe Engineer
Mainframe and Scheduling | Infrastructure Technology Services
Toyota Motor North America
bill.bis...@toyota.com
Office: (469) 292-5149
Cell: (502) 316-4386
Your JCL said vol=ser=TAP001, but your catalog entry says the serial number is
T000523.
Are you trying to restore this tape on to a system other than where it was
created and is this tape not cataloged there or in that systems tape management
environment?
Thanks
Bill Bishop
Consultant,
Single volume beats any chance of multivolume being the problem, I'd open a PMR
at this point.
Regards,
Leo
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Nai, Dean
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 4:18 PM
To:
NONVSAM --- BACKUP.DLY.SMFLGB.G0449V00
IN-CAT --- CATALOG.PRODCAT.VOEMP01
HISTORY
DATASET-OWNER-(NULL) CREATION2019.311
RELEASE2 EXPIRATION--.000
ENCRYPTIONDATA
DATA SET ENCRYPTION-(NO)
VOLUMES
http://www.longpelaexpertise.com.au/ezine/SoftwareUsageWithoutTADz.php
For many years IBMs Peter Relson has offered a free ‘as is, no
warranty’ tool to monitor program fetch activity: the Module Fetch
Monitor. Contact Peter directly at rel...@us.ibm.com.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:07 AM Steff
Is the dataset on a single tape volume or multiple? Can you provide the LISTCAT
ENT(/) ALL of the file?
Leo
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Nai, Dean
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 4:00 PM
To:
Looked at Ca1 catalog and os catalog. Label is correct. We are running 2.3
Dean Nai
Senior z/OS Systems Programmer
Technical Services Group
Department of Information Technology
State of New Hampshire
27 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03301
work: 603-271-1529
Statement of Confidentiality:
I want to assume the tapes used to restore the volume are cataloged and you are
using the catalog?
During a RESTORE, the sequence number of the record read, 2 (in
hexadecimal) did not match the previous record processed, 1 (in
hexadecimal). If there is an end of volume involved, a
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/composing-code-why-musici_b_10714288
And many other articles.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:23 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> I wouldn't go that far, but I have certainly seen a correlation.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
>
>
ADR101I (R/I)-RI01 (01), TASKID 001 HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO COMMAND 'RESTORE '
ADR109I (R/I)-RI01 (01), 2019.317 14:10:45 INITIAL SCAN OF USER CONTROL
STATEMENTS COMPLETED
ADR016I (001)-PRIME(01), RACF LOGGING OPTION IN EFFECT FOR THIS TASK
ADR006I (001)-STEND(01), 2019.317 14:10:45 EXECUTION BEGINS
Please provide the complete error message.
The error message does not address tape labels. (A wrong label would produce a
system error before DFDSS got to the tape.) It says the sequence number of
data records is wrong. This may indicate a corrupt file.
What system level are you at. There
Has anyone ever run into a problem where they have full volume backups that
produce a ADR370E message when trying to restore? That message says the label
and DSN on the tape don't match although I know they do. Any thoughts?
Control cards:
Restore -
Admin -
Inddname(indd1) outddname(outdd1) -
Consider solution P-Tracker (ESAi Group, developer: UBS-Hainer) for IBM z/OS
software/application program invocation tracking for audit, compliance,
asset-management. Link: http://www.esaigroup.com/products/ptracker.htm
Scott Barry
SBBWorks, Inc.
On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 18:06:12 +0200, Steff
On 2019-11-13 11:06, Steff Gladstone wrote:
We would like to clean up our load libraries by deleting unused programs.
Is there any way to use SMF data to track real-time usage of programs which
are not main programs but are called by other programs?
We were under the impression that only
My two cents:
- Update every program to make a trace call. I'll prefer General tracking
facility than Generic Trace.
- http://www.longpelaexpertise.com.au/ezine/SoftwareUsageWithoutTADz.php
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
W dniu 2019-11-12 o 20:07, Dale R. Smith pisze:
Not sure how many people on the list read the Mainframe Edition of the IBM
Systems Magazine, but I saw this article recently in the September/October 2019
edition online:
https://ibmsystemsmag.com/IBM-Z/09/2019/peter-relson
I assume his
W dniu 2019-11-10 o 17:01, Tom Brennan pisze:
Last week I was invited to an IBM z15 meeting for a particular
customer. There were 7 younger folks in the row behind me who stood
out among all the (let's say) "older" people there. I was amazed when
I found out they were recently hired out of
I wouldn't go that far, but I have certainly seen a correlation.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Mike Schwab
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 7:21 PM
To:
Not only AC(1) from an authorized library, but from an authorized
concatenation. But see LNKAUTH=LNKLST.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Jeffrey Holst
GTF
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Steff Gladstone
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 11:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Tracking called (non-main) programs using
If you are using ACF2 you can set LOG to the program on the PROGRAM class, I
think RACF doesn’t log FASTAUTH requests but ACF2 does.
T R(PGM)
RECKEY myprog ADD(UID(*) LOG)
We actually use a homegrown ICHRTX00 exit to log program usage which works very
well and it's "free" but like Charles
Similar topics have been kicked around here several times. You are basically
correct -- SMF will not do the job you want it to do.
SMF 30 reports the "high CPU usage" program of the jobstep. That might be a
different program than the jobstep program. It's an additional clue, but it is
not the
We would like to clean up our load libraries by deleting unused programs.
Is there any way to use SMF data to track real-time usage of programs which
are not main programs but are called by other programs?
We were under the impression that only executions of main programs (PGM=)
were recorded
For a TSO program to get control via CALL in an authorized state, it must be in
IKJTSOxx AUTHPGM, it must be linked AC(1) and come from an APF authorized
library.
You can also use AUTHTSF to invoke a program via IKJEFTSR if you require more
flexibility with the parameter lists (but the AC(1)
Does AUTHPGM require that the specified program have a non-zero AC or that it
be in an APF authorized library?
I ask because it appears that a very clever user may have written a program
whose name matches a program in the AUTHPGM list. The program executes a macro
instruction that requires
> Won't DFSORT manage the SORTWORKs?
Gil/John,
Dave Betten already answered the question below.
"You use SORTDD= in the parameter lists to pass a separate prefix for each
sort.
For example you might pass SORTDD=SRT1 for the first one, SORDD=SRT2 for
the second, etc.
That way each will allocate
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:21 PM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:43:26 -0600, John McKown wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:18 PM Tom Marchant wrote:
> >
> >> We have a multitasking address space in which we would like to
> >>
Cool shirt!
On 2019-11-13 3:07 AM, Dale R. Smith wrote:
Not sure how many people on the list read the Mainframe Edition of the IBM
Systems Magazine, but I saw this article recently in the September/October 2019
edition online:
https://ibmsystemsmag.com/IBM-Z/09/2019/peter-relson
I assume
43 matches
Mail list logo
