Re: Strange COBOL 6.2/3 problem: BASIS/COPYLOC/PDS fails

2020-10-01 Thread Peter Vels
I can reproduce this with: PP 5655-EC6 IBM Enterprise COBOL for z/OS 6.1.0 P180612 Peter On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 at 00:46, Charles Mills wrote: > It appears to me that COBOL 6.2 or 6.3 fails a BASIS statement if there is > any COPYLOC in effect and SYSLIB is a PDS, but not if SYSLIB is a PDSE. > >

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Joseph Reichman
The names the datasets are in the IGGCSI00 output buffer the date is part of the file name so *2020* snipet of my filter > On Oct 1, 2020, at 5:34 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote: > > Sound like the best way > > Thanks > > > >> On Oct 1, 2020, at 5:23 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote: >> >> I'd

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Joseph Reichman
Sound like the best way Thanks > On Oct 1, 2020, at 5:23 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote: > > I'd loop over the datasets, doing allocate, process, free for each before > going to the next. > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > >

Re: [External] Re: syslogd configuration questions regarding splitting out logging

2020-10-01 Thread Pommier, Rex
Hi Salva, Thank you. I saw the second job spawn off as FTPD4 but had completely forgotten the address space rename. Thanks again for jogging my aging memory. :-) Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Salva Carrasco Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:19:47 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote: >I don’t know if I would find the space >I work for the IRS have to get ready filing season 2021 >Looking for data in filing season 2020 > >Huge amounts of DASD > Lizette's pseudocode appears to show that she means the *names* of the

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Seymour J Metz
I'd loop over the datasets, doing allocate, process, free for each before going to the next. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Joseph Reichman Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Joseph Reichman
I don’t know if I would find the space I work for the IRS have to get ready filing season 2021 Looking for data in filing season 2020 Huge amounts of DASD > On Oct 1, 2020, at 5:16 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote: > > Just a thought, > > Why not put all datasets in a sequential file. Which is

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Lizette Koehler
Just a thought, Why not put all datasets in a sequential file. Which is then used as input to your process Then your process could do Read input list of files Do Loop until Input all read Open file Search file If match - do Something Close file End loop Keep going through as

Re: CL/Supersession

2020-10-01 Thread Steve Beaver
Do you need the 147 or 210 manuals? Sent from my iPhone I promise you I can’t type or Spell on any smartphone > On Oct 1, 2020, at 15:55, Roberto Halais wrote: > > If it's version 2.10 then: > >

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Joseph Reichman
You may be right Was doing it in assembler Because that’s the language used But whatever works Thanks PS my code was proceeded by a call IGGCSI00 to get the dataset names > On Oct 1, 2020, at 4:54 PM, Paul Gilmartin > <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > On

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:46:25 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote: >Have to read 4,471 files ( VB files ) looking >For data obviously there is a concatenation limit which is why my question >were centered dynamic allocation and deallocation > Does a concatenation gain you anything compared to the

Re: CL/Supersession

2020-10-01 Thread Roberto Halais
If it's version 2.10 then: https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/apilite?infotype=PM%20OR%20SA=1415=clsupersession=CLSMKTG%20or%20CLSV21%20or%20CLSV147 On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 2:42 PM Skippy the Ancient wrote: > We have partial documentation from the wrong version of CL/Supersession. > (The IBM

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Joseph Reichman
Have to read 4,471 files ( VB files ) looking For data obviously there is a concatenation limit which is why my question were centered dynamic allocation and deallocation Thanks > On Oct 1, 2020, at 4:36 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote: > > I guess my question is how is to be processed? > > Do

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Lizette Koehler
I guess my question is how is to be processed? Do you need the filename the record came from Do you just need go through all the files looking for something specific? Are these files GDGs or does the name vary or is there a common mask Depending on the answers, you could look at using a

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Joseph Reichman
Thanks > On Oct 1, 2020, at 4:22 PM, Paul Gilmartin > <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 15:59:49 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote: > >> Not familiar with BPXDYN >> >

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 15:59:49 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote: >Not familiar with BPXDYN > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.bpxb600/wdyn.htm It's very useful, and part of base z/OS. >In light of this I think I’m going to re-phrase >My question I have to

Re: syslogd configuration questions regarding splitting out logging

2020-10-01 Thread Salva Carrasco
Hi. When you connect to ftp server, ftpd1 spawn a ftpd2, 3, 4... or _bpx_jobname if configured. As soon as the user/pwd is entered and verified the (same) address space is renamed to userid-n. This is the reason why you see the majority of messages in tcpip.log instead ftp.log.

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Joseph Reichman
Not familiar with BPXDYN In light of this I think I’m going to re-phrase My question I have to process ( read ) 4,471 Files with a 100 file concatenation limit What would be the best method ? Thanks > On Oct 1, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Paul Gilmartin >

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 19:46:33 +0100, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote: >Long ago (actually 1989 I think) I wrote a CONCAT TSO command which can be >used to add or remove data sets from a concatenated list. It can also perform >a FREE. This loops round each entry in the concatenated set and frees each

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Savor, Thomas
Hi Lennie, I'm interestedPlease it as well Thanks, Tom -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Spiegel Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 3:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset Hi

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread David Spiegel
Hi Lennie, I am interested. Please send it. Thanks and regards, David On 2020-10-01 14:46, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote: Long ago (actually 1989 I think) I wrote a CONCAT TSO command which can be used to add or remove data sets from a concatenated list. It can also perform a FREE. This loops

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Joseph Reichman
Would this be on cbttape.org If not would you mind sharing Thanks > On Oct 1, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw > <032fff1be9b4-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > Long ago (actually 1989 I think) I wrote a CONCAT TSO command which can be > used to add or remove data

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
Long ago (actually 1989 I think) I wrote a CONCAT TSO command which can be used to add or remove data sets from a concatenated list. It can also perform a FREE. This loops round each entry in the concatenated set and frees each data set. It still works a treat. I still have the code should

Re: CL/Supersession

2020-10-01 Thread Steve Beaver
What version are you using? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Skippy the Ancient Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 1:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: CL/Supersession We have partial documentation from the wrong

CL/Supersession

2020-10-01 Thread Skippy the Ancient
We have partial documentation from the wrong version of CL/Supersession. (The IBM doc links get a 400. Fun.) I have less than a days experience with Supersession and am doing my best to solve a problem. I was able to get Maint access and look at users profiles. Every users group profile

Re: DFDSS support for ZFS files query

2020-10-01 Thread Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
If you fork pax then I think this would mean DSS would be invoking access methods to perform the backup. DSS has used lower level processes to perform backups up to now. I mention this because it has a big impact on the way that data is processed when the data is encrypted. Currently DSS

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Joseph Reichman
Thanks Your last point it something worth trying wonder if I can add text unit DALCLOSE ( free = close) to the S99VRBCC verb parameter list in addition to DALDDNAM Thanks PS If have 4,471 files I have to process my installation limit of concatenation is about 100. I have to allocate and

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Rupert Reynolds
I'm very rusty (MVS/ESA) but from my POV it seems to me that you need to free each DDNAME that you concatenated, individually after decat. Unless you can simply FREE the DDNAME of the concatenation? Rupert On Thu., Oct. 1, 2020, 18:25 Joseph Reichman, wrote: > I’m running the program under

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Joseph Reichman
I’m running the program under test After I do decocatenate verb 04 With the ddname text 01 I get a rc 0 from SVC 99 I then go to ISPF Do a ISRDDN And I have a number of files actually 100 Each with a ddname SYS7,SYS8 etc. This indicates to me that although they are decocatenated they

syslogd configuration questions regarding splitting out logging

2020-10-01 Thread Pommier, Rex
Hello list, I'm working on doing some configuration of syslogd, namely trying to split out FTP data into a separate log file from the rest of the daemon records getting logged. Here's the relevant portion of the syslogd configuration: *.ftp*.*.* /var/logs/ftpd.log *.*

Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 07:58:56 -0400 Joseph Reichman wrote: :>I allocate a number of datasets the last text unit being DALCLOSE :>(unallocated on close) In my second step I concatenate the datasets. At :>EOF I close them after wards Ideconcatenate them My question is :>shouldn't the

Re: Working link for current 3270 Data Stream

2020-10-01 Thread R.S.
I remember that printing BOO was the worst thing available. It was acceptable when you wanted to print a page, but chapter was horribly formated. I always kept PDF collection as possible source to print the book. And actually I still use last (z/OS 1.13) BOO collection. I use more recent

Strange COBOL 6.2/3 problem: BASIS/COPYLOC/PDS fails

2020-10-01 Thread Charles Mills
It appears to me that COBOL 6.2 or 6.3 fails a BASIS statement if there is any COPYLOC in effect and SYSLIB is a PDS, but not if SYSLIB is a PDSE. The error is IGYLI0053-U A library read error occurred during "BASIS" processing. No member was found or there was a bad block. //S1 EXEC

Re: DFDSS support for ZFS files query

2020-10-01 Thread Glenn Wilcock
For those following this thread who have a DFSMShsm license, HSM does support this. It can backup all files, files based on wildcards and exclude specific files as directed by an EXCLUDE. A UNIX shell command is also available, to perform the HSM backups/recoveries directly from UNIX. Glenn

Re: DFDSS support for ZFS files query

2020-10-01 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 09:44:52 -0500, Ernesto Figueroa wrote: >You are correct. For now, you must specify all the path names, but we >understand this is a capability that ought to be provided in DFSMSdss. As >others have mentioned, you may be able to use other tools to craft a list of >path

Re: FTPS Handshake Error

2020-10-01 Thread Wendell Lovewell
We have certificates RACLISTED (no idea what that equates to in Top Secret). I do: RACDCERT ID() TRUST ADD('') - WITHLABEL('ftp.mackinney.com') RACDCERT ADDRING() ID() SETROPTS RACLIST(DIGTCERT DIGTRING) REFRESH RACDCERT ID() CONNECT(CERTAUTH USAGE(CERTAUTH) - LABEL('AAA

Re: FTPS Handshake Error

2020-10-01 Thread Wendell Lovewell
We have certificates RACLISTED (no idea what that equates to in Top Secret). I do: RACDCERT ID() TRUST ADD('') - WITHLABEL('ftp.mackinney.com') RACDCERT ADDRING() ID() SETROPTS RACLIST(DIGTCERT DIGTRING) REFRESH RACDCERT ID() CONNECT(CERTAUTH USAGE(CERTAUTH) - LABEL('AAA

Re: SMPe Sourceid in GLOBAL not in TARGET

2020-10-01 Thread Kurt Quackenbush
On 9/30/2020 7:27 PM, Bill Giannelli wrote: I have a sourceid in a global zone that doesnt show up in the target zone. When I run an apply it fails with : APPLY PTFS APARS GROUPEXTEND NOJCLR BYPASS(HOLDSYS(DB2BIND,DOC,ACTION,DELETE))

Re: shopz UJ01255

2020-10-01 Thread Kurt Quackenbush
On 9/30/2020 10:24 PM, R Hey wrote: Thanks for the replies. I ordered UJ01255, it had PUT2001 (no RSU 8 months later). I did raise the issue with support, was told : UJ01255 was not included in RSU2001. It didn't not meet the following criteria: -Severity 1 or 2 -HIPER -PEFIX

Re: usleep()

2020-10-01 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:19:32 -0400, Phil Smith III wrote: >The usleep() function in z/OS is documented as taking a single operand that >must be less than 1M; on other platforms, it must be *at least* 1M. It also >generates no error, and just returns instantly if you give it a value of 1M or

SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset

2020-10-01 Thread Joseph Reichman
Hi I allocate a number of datasets the last text unit being DALCLOSE (unallocated on close) In my second step I concatenate the datasets. At EOF I close them after wards Ideconcatenate them My question is shouldn't the individual datasets be unallocated as well thanks

Re: usleep()

2020-10-01 Thread David Crayford
On 2020-10-01 5:19 AM, Phil Smith III wrote: The usleep() function in z/OS is documented as taking a single operand that must be less than 1M; on other platforms, it must be *at least* 1M. It also generates no error, and just returns instantly if you give it a value of 1M or more. usleep()

Re: DFDSS support for ZFS files query

2020-10-01 Thread Sean Gleann
Thank you, Ernesto - much appreciated Vote added. Regards Sean On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 15:55, Ernesto Figueroa wrote: > You are correct. For now, you must specify all the path names, but we > understand this is a capability that ought to be provided in DFSMSdss. As > others have mentioned,