I can reproduce this with: PP 5655-EC6 IBM Enterprise COBOL for z/OS 6.1.0
P180612
Peter
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 at 00:46, Charles Mills wrote:
> It appears to me that COBOL 6.2 or 6.3 fails a BASIS statement if there is
> any COPYLOC in effect and SYSLIB is a PDS, but not if SYSLIB is a PDSE.
>
>
The names the datasets are in the IGGCSI00 output buffer the date is part of
the file name so *2020* snipet of my filter
> On Oct 1, 2020, at 5:34 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>
> Sound like the best way
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>> On Oct 1, 2020, at 5:23 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>>
>> I'd
Sound like the best way
Thanks
> On Oct 1, 2020, at 5:23 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> I'd loop over the datasets, doing allocate, process, free for each before
> going to the next.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
>
> __
Hi Salva,
Thank you. I saw the second job spawn off as FTPD4 but had completely
forgotten the address space rename. Thanks again for jogging my aging memory.
:-)
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Salva Carrasco
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:19:47 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>I don’t know if I would find the space
>I work for the IRS have to get ready filing season 2021
>Looking for data in filing season 2020
>
>Huge amounts of DASD
>
Lizette's pseudocode appears to show that she means
the *names* of the dat
I'd loop over the datasets, doing allocate, process, free for each before going
to the next.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Joseph Reichman
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 5:1
I don’t know if I would find the space
I work for the IRS have to get ready filing season 2021
Looking for data in filing season 2020
Huge amounts of DASD
> On Oct 1, 2020, at 5:16 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>
> Just a thought,
>
> Why not put all datasets in a sequential file. Which is
Just a thought,
Why not put all datasets in a sequential file. Which is then used as input to
your process
Then your process could do
Read input list of files
Do Loop until Input all read
Open file
Search file
If match - do Something
Close file
End loop
Keep going through as many
Do you need the 147 or 210 manuals?
Sent from my iPhone
I promise you I can’t type or
Spell on any smartphone
> On Oct 1, 2020, at 15:55, Roberto Halais wrote:
>
> If it's version 2.10 then:
>
> https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/apilite?infotype=PM%20OR%20SA&lastdays=1415&appname=clsuperses
You may be right
Was doing it in assembler
Because that’s the language used
But whatever works
Thanks
PS my code was proceeded by a call IGGCSI00 to get the dataset names
> On Oct 1, 2020, at 4:54 PM, Paul Gilmartin
> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On Thu
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:46:25 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>Have to read 4,471 files ( VB files ) looking
>For data obviously there is a concatenation limit which is why my question
>were centered dynamic allocation and deallocation
>
Does a concatenation gain you anything compared to the simple
If it's version 2.10 then:
https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/apilite?infotype=PM%20OR%20SA&lastdays=1415&appname=clsupersession&doctype=CLSMKTG%20or%20CLSV21%20or%20CLSV147
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 2:42 PM Skippy the Ancient wrote:
> We have partial documentation from the wrong version of CL/Sup
Have to read 4,471 files ( VB files ) looking
For data obviously there is a concatenation limit which is why my question were
centered dynamic allocation and deallocation
Thanks
> On Oct 1, 2020, at 4:36 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>
> I guess my question is how is to be processed?
>
> Do
I guess my question is how is to be processed?
Do you need the filename the record came from
Do you just need go through all the files looking for something specific?
Are these files GDGs or does the name vary or is there a common mask
Depending on the answers, you could look at using a utilit
Thanks
> On Oct 1, 2020, at 4:22 PM, Paul Gilmartin
> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 15:59:49 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>
>> Not familiar with BPXDYN
>>
> https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.bpxb60
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 15:59:49 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>Not familiar with BPXDYN
>
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.bpxb600/wdyn.htm
It's very useful, and part of base z/OS.
>In light of this I think I’m going to re-phrase
>My question I have to pro
Hi.
When you connect to ftp server, ftpd1 spawn a ftpd2, 3, 4... or _bpx_jobname if
configured.
As soon as the user/pwd is entered and verified the (same) address space is
renamed to userid-n.
This is the reason why you see the majority of messages in tcpip.log instead
ftp.log.
-
Not familiar with BPXDYN
In light of this I think I’m going to re-phrase
My question I have to process ( read ) 4,471
Files with a 100 file concatenation limit
What would be the best method ?
Thanks
> On Oct 1, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Paul Gilmartin
> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 19:46:33 +0100, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
>Long ago (actually 1989 I think) I wrote a CONCAT TSO command which can be
>used to add or remove data sets from a concatenated list. It can also perform
>a FREE. This loops round each entry in the concatenated set and frees each
Hi Lennie,
I'm interestedPlease it as well
Thanks,
Tom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
David Spiegel
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 3:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: SVC 99 unallocating a concatenated dataset
Hi Le
Hi Lennie,
I am interested. Please send it.
Thanks and regards,
David
On 2020-10-01 14:46, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
Long ago (actually 1989 I think) I wrote a CONCAT TSO command which can be used
to add or remove data sets from a concatenated list. It can also perform a
FREE. This loops
Would this be on cbttape.org
If not would you mind sharing
Thanks
> On Oct 1, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
> <032fff1be9b4-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Long ago (actually 1989 I think) I wrote a CONCAT TSO command which can be
> used to add or remove data set
Long ago (actually 1989 I think) I wrote a CONCAT TSO command which can be used
to add or remove data sets from a concatenated list. It can also perform a
FREE. This loops round each entry in the concatenated set and frees each data
set.
It still works a treat.
I still have the code should any
What version are you using?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Skippy the Ancient
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 1:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: CL/Supersession
We have partial documentation from the wrong
We have partial documentation from the wrong version of CL/Supersession. (The
IBM doc links get a 400. Fun.)
I have less than a days experience with Supersession and am doing my best to
solve a problem.
I was able to get Maint access and look at users profiles. Every users group
profile na
If you fork pax then I think this would mean DSS would be invoking access
methods to perform the backup. DSS has used lower level processes to perform
backups up to now.
I mention this because it has a big impact on the way that data is processed
when the data is encrypted. Currently DSS backs
Thanks
Your last point it something worth trying
wonder if I can add text unit DALCLOSE
( free = close) to the S99VRBCC verb parameter list in addition to DALDDNAM
Thanks
PS
If have 4,471 files I have to process my installation limit of concatenation is
about 100. I have to allocate and
I'm very rusty (MVS/ESA) but from my POV it seems to me that you need to
free each DDNAME that you concatenated, individually after decat. Unless
you can simply FREE the DDNAME of the concatenation?
Rupert
On Thu., Oct. 1, 2020, 18:25 Joseph Reichman, wrote:
> I’m running the program under te
I’m running the program under test
After I do decocatenate verb 04
With the ddname text 01
I get a rc 0 from SVC 99
I then go to ISPF
Do a ISRDDN
And I have a number of files actually 100
Each with a ddname SYS7,SYS8 etc. This indicates to me that although
they are decocatenated they
Hello list,
I'm working on doing some configuration of syslogd, namely trying to split out
FTP data into a separate log file from the rest of the daemon records getting
logged.
Here's the relevant portion of the syslogd configuration:
*.ftp*.*.* /var/logs/ftpd.log
*.* /var/lo
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 07:58:56 -0400 Joseph Reichman
wrote:
:>I allocate a number of datasets the last text unit being DALCLOSE
:>(unallocated on close) In my second step I concatenate the datasets. At
:>EOF I close them after wards Ideconcatenate them My question is
:>shouldn't the individua
I remember that printing BOO was the worst thing available. It was
acceptable when you wanted to print a page, but chapter was horribly
formated.
I always kept PDF collection as possible source to print the book.
And actually I still use last (z/OS 1.13) BOO collection. I use more
recent books
It appears to me that COBOL 6.2 or 6.3 fails a BASIS statement if there is
any COPYLOC in effect and SYSLIB is a PDS, but not if SYSLIB is a PDSE.
The error is IGYLI0053-U A library read error occurred during "BASIS"
processing. No member was found or there was a bad block.
//S1 EXEC PGM
For those following this thread who have a DFSMShsm license, HSM does support
this. It can backup all files, files based on wildcards and exclude specific
files as directed by an EXCLUDE. A UNIX shell command is also available, to
perform the HSM backups/recoveries directly from UNIX.
Glenn
--
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 09:44:52 -0500, Ernesto Figueroa wrote:
>You are correct. For now, you must specify all the path names, but we
>understand this is a capability that ought to be provided in DFSMSdss. As
>others have mentioned, you may be able to use other tools to craft a list of
>path name
We have certificates RACLISTED (no idea what that equates to in Top Secret). I
do:
RACDCERT ID(&KEYOWNR) TRUST ADD('&USER..MACK.CERT') -
WITHLABEL('ftp.mackinney.com')
RACDCERT ADDRING(&KEYRING) ID(&KEYOWNR)
SETROPTS RACLIST(DIGTCERT DIGTRING) REFRESH
RACDCERT ID(&KEYOWNR) CONNECT(CERTA
We have certificates RACLISTED (no idea what that equates to in Top Secret). I
do:
RACDCERT ID(&KEYOWNR) TRUST ADD('&USER..MACK.CERT') -
WITHLABEL('ftp.mackinney.com')
RACDCERT ADDRING(&KEYRING) ID(&KEYOWNR)
SETROPTS RACLIST(DIGTCERT DIGTRING) REFRESH
RACDCERT ID(&KEYOWNR) CONNECT(CERTA
On 9/30/2020 7:27 PM, Bill Giannelli wrote:
I have a sourceid in a global zone that doesnt show up in the target zone. When
I run an apply it fails with :
APPLY
PTFS
APARS
GROUPEXTEND
NOJCLR
BYPASS(HOLDSYS(DB2BIND,DOC,ACTION,DELETE))
CHECK
On 9/30/2020 10:24 PM, R Hey wrote:
Thanks for the replies.
I ordered UJ01255, it had PUT2001 (no RSU 8 months later).
I did raise the issue with support, was told :
UJ01255 was not included in RSU2001.
It didn't not meet the following criteria:
-Severity 1 or 2
-HIPER
-PEFIX
-
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:19:32 -0400, Phil Smith III wrote:
>The usleep() function in z/OS is documented as taking a single operand that
>must be less than 1M; on other platforms, it must be *at least* 1M. It also
>generates no error, and just returns instantly if you give it a value of 1M or
>mo
Hi
I allocate a number of datasets the last text unit being DALCLOSE
(unallocated on close) In my second step I concatenate the datasets. At
EOF I close them after wards Ideconcatenate them My question is
shouldn't the individual datasets be unallocated as well
thanks
---
On 2020-10-01 5:19 AM, Phil Smith III wrote:
The usleep() function in z/OS is documented as taking a single operand that
must be less than 1M; on other platforms, it must be *at least* 1M. It also
generates no error, and just returns instantly if you give it a value of 1M or
more.
usleep() r
Thank you, Ernesto - much appreciated
Vote added.
Regards
Sean
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 15:55, Ernesto Figueroa wrote:
> You are correct. For now, you must specify all the path names, but we
> understand this is a capability that ought to be provided in DFSMSdss. As
> others have mentioned, you
43 matches
Mail list logo