Is the TSO TESTAUTH command still around? I have to admit I can't
remember ever trying it. My debugging method of such code typically
consisted of multiple temporary WTO's to let me know where the program
was at before it failed, and also display fields or registers I was
interested in.
In article <9007603817792033.wa.nitzibmgmx@listserv.ua.edu> you wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:57:08 -0600, Ravi Gaur wrote:
>
> >Writing and debugging an assembler code which has MODESET instruction to
> >change key and while debugging it via IDF or Debug tool both abend with
> >S047(APF)
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:57:08 -0600, Ravi Gaur wrote:
>Writing and debugging an assembler code which has MODESET instruction to
>change key and while debugging it via IDF or Debug tool both abend with
>S047(APF) issue. Anyone know a way to debug facility for code without using
>IDF/Debug tool?
**Positing in Assembler group as well** - However given the activity thought to
put it in IBM-Main as well.
Writing and debugging an assembler code which has MODESET instruction to change
key and while debugging it via IDF or Debug tool both abend with S047(APF)
issue. Anyone know a way to
Believe this can be done via the ACS test in ISMF.
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, February 25, 2021 10:21 PM, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
> Is there a TSO command, or ISPF command/service, that can be provided a
> dataset name and have it return if the dataset is SMS managed or
I remember this activity . . .
On Thursday, February 25, 2021, 08:28:06 PM EST, g...@gabegold.com
wrote:
In 1971, Mitre (DC-area non-profit think tank for government -- had a 2250
connected to OS/360, which included native device support for it. When we
installed VM circa 1972, I
In 1971, Mitre (DC-area non-profit think tank for government -- had a 2250
connected to OS/360, which included native device support for it. When we
installed VM circa 1972, I got to make it work under CMS (component of VM).
VERY fortunately someone at University of Grenoble (France) had
Are you asking about the calling program or the called program? I think the
called program, but not sure.
A called program that does not contain any EXEC CICS commands can be compiled
with either DYNAM or NODYNAM, in general. If the called program calls another
program (the only case where
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021, at 21:10, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:56:36 +, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> >... Better, use several trailing steps and conditional jcl ...
> >
> That's *so* 20th Century. Better, wrap the payload in a Rexx
> program that can do a SELECT on the
Hello,
.
We are beginning to migrate our CICS V5.4 COBOL programs to COBOL 6.
.
I need some clarification on compiling CICS COBOL 6 Programs without a
Translator.
These programs DO NOT contain any EXEC CICS commands and are invoked via a CALL
statement and NOT an EXEC CICS LINK.
.
In this
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:56:36 +, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
>
>> signal on NOVALUE
>> do CheckRC = 1
>> Address TSO “LISTBC”
>> If rc == 0 then Address tso “submit *”
>>Else address SYSCALL sleep 10
>> End CheckRC
>>
Oops! I left an endless loop. I leave the termination
Lionel,
it seems you're looking for something that calls SMS and asks for future
allocation.
There's a request in ISMF panel 7 (Automatic Class Selection) and 4 Test
that simulate the allocation and gives back the response.
I don't know (I suppose yes) if it's possible to call the service from a
Is there a TSO command, or ISPF command/service, that can be provided a
dataset name and have it return if the dataset is SMS managed or not?
I know LISTDSI will do this for existing datasets but I'm looking for how to
do this for a new dataset that has not been allocated yet.
Thanks
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021, at 14:34, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:02:38 -0500, Joseph Reichman wrote:
> signal on NOVALUE
> do CheckRC = 1
> Address TSO “LISTBC”
> If rc == 0 then Address tso “submit *”
>Else address SYSCALL sleep 10
> End CheckRC
>
> Have
Call me snarky then, because I purposely left the multiple iterations of the
instructions when I responded.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 8:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External]
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:26:53 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>Should be three instances of the instructions ...
>
Why not prune them? One is enough; three times is Snarky!
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Thank you so much
> On Feb 25, 2021, at 9:34 AM, Paul Gilmartin
> <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:02:38 -0500, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>
>> I am running all of this from Rex building JCL searching files there are a
>> huge number of files
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:02:38 -0500, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>I am running all of this from Rex building JCL searching files there are a
>huge number of files so I break them up into different jobs
>
>What I am going to try is do
>Checkrc:
>Address TSO “LISTBC”
>
>If rc == 0 then go
>
Work for the IRS don’t know if it’s available
Will try to find out
> On Feb 25, 2021, at 9:12 AM, David Spiegel wrote:
>
> Hi Joseph,
> You could also interrogate the job (provided that your employer has an SDSF
> licence) via the SDSF API.
>
> Regards,
> David
>
>> On 2021-02-25 09:02,
Hi Joseph,
You could also interrogate the job (provided that your employer has an
SDSF licence) via the SDSF API.
Regards,
David
On 2021-02-25 09:02, Joseph Reichman wrote:
I am running all of this from Rex building JCL searching files there are a huge
number of files so I break them up
I am running all of this from Rex building JCL searching files there are a huge
number of files so I break them up into different jobs
What I am going to try is do
Checkrc:
Address TSO “LISTBC”
If rc == 0 then go
Address tso “submit *”
Else
Sleep(10)
Goto checkrc
End
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 21:48:54 -0600, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
>
>.., most job schedulers have ways to inhibit conflicting jobs from
>running in parallel, like defining a single resource required ...
>
A scheduler seems overkill. DISP=MOD should suffice.
-- gil
22 matches
Mail list logo
