Re: z/OS v2r5 - Cert fingerprint

Yup, it does. Great news. https://event.share.org/p/do/sd/sid=18452 - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, March 5, 2021 8:31 AM, Michael Babcock wrote: > Sounds like it to me! > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:28 PM kekronbekron < > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Re: DFHSM Backups using DFDSS - Enqueues

or maybe they want the ADRUENQ exit to bypass the enqueue? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: RES: Tape solutions for mainframe

The "former BUSTECH" is also claimed by OPTICA (the people who make converters and directors), for their z/VT product. It's a lot closer to the original BUSTECH than DLm, but they could both be based on the same technology. Brian

Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond

When you click on the link below to get the announcement and then from there click on the link to go the software update page at (https://www.ibm.com/support/z-content-solutions/software-update-zosmf/), and then click on the link to "configure your software management service", you get a dead l

www.cbttape.org is updated with CBT Version 501 (partially)

Dear Folks, The CBT Tape Version 501 has been cut, and the www.cbttape.org website has been partially updated.  I hope to finish the update of the website tomorrow. Meanwhile, all the new files have been loaded into the CBT directory, so you can get to them now.  Also, File 001, in

Re: z/OS v2r5 - Cert fingerprint

Sounds like it to me! On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:28 PM kekronbekron < 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Yeah.. does that mean cert usage is now finally trackable? > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Thursday, March 4, 2021 8:10 PM, Michael Babcock > wrote: > >

Re: z/OS v2r5 - Cert fingerprint

Yeah.. does that mean cert usage is now finally trackable? - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, March 4, 2021 8:10 PM, Michael Babcock wrote: > According to the preview announcement, they plan to store the fingerprint > stuff in SMF. > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 5:38 AM kekronbekro

Re: Where UADS dataset name goes in case of ACF2?

How about using SHOWzOS from CBT Tape ? Section on >Master JCL shows this info. Doug On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 22:26:35 +, A T & T Management wrote: > >The MASTERJCL residing in PARMLIB can be read via browse or edit (and thus >changed) in TSO ISPF.  The likelihood of it being changed would

Re: Where UADS dataset name goes in case of ACF2?

The MASTERJCL residing in PARMLIB can be read via browse or edit (and thus changed) in TSO ISPF.  The likelihood of it being changed would be rare.  Can't imagine any other way to see what it is beside the way you mentioned or my way.  Of course you can see via ISPF who changed it and when. Sc

Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond

On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:16:37 -0500, Kurt Quackenbush wrote: >On 3/3/2021 10:53 PM, Jake Anderson wrote: > >> If I understand zosmf is going to connect to IBM site over the internet to >> download it's software.What if a mainframe data centre which doesn't >> connect to internet or have restriction

Re: EMC DLM over IBM VTL

We did the same about 5 years ago. Originally started using the DLM and Data Domain just for the mainframe data. We also replicate to our cold site with a matching pair. We started adding more Windows related data using SQL DD Boost and server Veeam backups to it. We absolutely zero perfor

Re: DFHSM Backups using DFDSS - Enqueues

Thanks, True, but you cant set that option running under DFHSM. Or I cant find a parm to set it. Ms Terri E Shaffer Senior Systems Engineer, z/OS Support: ACIWorldwide – Telecommuter H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592) terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Di

Re: DFHSM Backups using DFDSS - Enqueues

I believe you are referring to the "SHARE and TOLERATE(ENQFAILURE)" switches in order to get a successful fuzzy copy. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.adru000/r2003.htm "You can specify TOLERATE(ENQFAILURE) in addition to the default, ENQ, or the SHARE o

DFHSM Backups using DFDSS - Enqueues

Hello, So its been awhile since I setup DFHSM, and have a small issue with doing my backups, with enqueue failures. Normally I would set TOL(ENQF) in DFDSS, but since DFHSM is passing control that flag never gets set. I did set BACKUP (INUSE to SERIALIZATION=PREFERRED) but that didn’t help

Re: Tape solutions for mainframe

We use Visara's VTA. We migrated from Secureagent and was happy to do so. I am using it with z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE and even an old OS/390 systems. Tony Thigpen Radoslaw Skorupka wrote on 3/4/21 12:04 PM: Gentlemen, I'm trying update my knowledge about existing tape solutions for mainframe on the

Re: EMC DLM over IBM VTL

Just curious, Carl: Is TCT implemented with DFSMShsm and DFSMSdss (and RACF) when using a PowerMax/DLm solution? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Carl Swanson Sent: Thursday, March 4, 2021 11:40 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: EMC DLM over

Re: Tape solutions for mainframe

Model9 בתאריך יום ה׳, 4 במרץ 2021, 19:35, מאת Bodra - Pessoal ‏< 02eda2bc565a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>: > 1. IBM TS7700 > Real tapes only as VTS backend - > > TS7760 has option to do not destage data to real tapes. All data stay in > VTS (as other vendors does). > > 2. STK/Sun/Oracle VS

Re: EMC DLM over IBM VTL

First off, thank you for your kind words, really appreciate that. One thing to note some recent announcements regarding DLm and PowerMax from Dell. Like IBM we now have Transparent Cloud Tiering (TCT), between the PowerMax and DLm. Like IBM we require our DASD and Virtual Tape pr

RES: Tape solutions for mainframe

1. IBM TS7700 Real tapes only as VTS backend - TS7760 has option to do not destage data to real tapes. All data stay in VTS (as other vendors does). 2. STK/Sun/Oracle VSM what about T1? Is it still offered? (I mean new sale, not an upgrade or service) As I know Oracle is going out of Tape

Tape solutions for mainframe

Gentlemen, I'm trying update my knowledge about existing tape solutions for mainframe on the market (let's say z/OS, *not* Linux): 1. IBM TS7700 Real tapes only as VTS backend 2. STK/Sun/Oracle VSM what about T1? Is it still offered? (I mean new sale, not an upgrade or service) 3. EMC DLm

Re: EMC DLM over IBM VTL

My poor and limited experience with DLm was related to performance: I started with single data stream (IEBDG job or similar). Obviously there was a point of saturation, I mean adding next data stream did not increase overall throughput. Even decreased it slightly. Of course adding any workload to

Re: IFAUSAGE REQUEST=FUNCTIONBEGIN nesting

FUNCTIONBEGIN/FUNCTIONEND can be nested for two different products (different PRODQUAL values result in unique product IDs) but if they are both registered under the same task, each of the products will receive the timing values for all work being done under that task. Regards, Bonnie Ordon

Re: EMC DLM over IBM VTL

"Will there be a impact to mainframe backup when there is a high backup volume for open system ?" I am employed by the Texas CPA where such a solution was implemented. We never experienced any problems with contention. First, our z/OS mainframe necessarily had its own MTree file structure on t

Re: Acquire Storage

I suspect that the S0C4 is reason code 4 and is a key 8 versus key 9 issue. But, as you noted, the OP has not provided details. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on beh

Re: z/OS v2r5 - Cert fingerprint

According to the preview announcement, they plan to store the fingerprint stuff in SMF. On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 5:38 AM kekronbekron < 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Any comments on this one from an IBM-er. > Could use some more info on cert fingerprint stuff. > > - KB >

Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond

Can't we wait another four years before getting rid of Serverpac? That's when I plan to retire. If not, then I'll have to look into early retirement :) -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kurt Quackenbush Sent: Thursday, March 4, 2021 9:17 AM To: IBM-MAI

Re: EMC DLM over IBM VTL

First full disclosure I work for Dell Technologies but more specifically in the DLm group, now with that out of the way. Probably more than 50% of the DLm customers do share their backend (Data Domain) storage with the distributed world and or the IBM-I world. What this means is

Re: Serverpac installs January 2022 and beyond

On 3/3/2021 10:53 PM, Jake Anderson wrote: If I understand zosmf is going to connect to IBM site over the internet to download it's software.What if a mainframe data centre which doesn't connect to internet or have restrictions ? Downloading your ServerPac using z/OSMF is mostly the same as dow

Re: Shopz had to reorder a product

W dniu 04.03.2021 o 13:34, Bill Giannelli pisze: We had a new CSI setup for us by a managed service company. it appears one of the underlying products was not applied correctly. This is IBM Tools Customizer for z/OS FMID HTCZ110. This product is then in turn used to install and configure Db2 Q

Re: Acquire Storage

While I'm sure all of the responses have been on target, none have discussed the actual problem. The OP should provide basic debugging information. What is it actually 0C4 and if so with what reason code? What was the user's PSW key? Depending on CICS configuration this could be key 8 or key 9.

Shopz had to reorder a product

We had a new CSI setup for us by a managed service company. it appears one of the underlying products was not applied correctly. This is IBM Tools Customizer for z/OS FMID HTCZ110. This product is then in turn used to install and configure Db2 Query Monitor and High Performance Unload for DB2 wh

Re: z/OS v2r5 - Cert fingerprint

Any comments on this one from an IBM-er. Could use some more info on cert fingerprint stuff. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, March 4, 2021 5:57 AM, Charles Mills wrote: > I was hoping for Radoslaw Skorupka V2R5. > > Charles > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainfram

Extending /tmp

Hi, I am attempting to install a product using Server Pac. When I run job RESTORE, I get a message that my /tmp filesystem is not large enough. I set up the TFS started task that should allow me to extend the temporary file system. The jobs says that I need 5814122 kbytes. I issued the command

Re: Acquire Storage

I recommend that you only use LE services; a CICS transaction should never use GETMAIN or STORAGE directly. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Savor, Thoma

Re: Where UADS dataset name goes in case of ACF2?

Yes, it's in the Master address space. There is no guaranty that MSTJCLxx hasn't changed since IPL, and I know of no operator or TSO command to display it. The best I can come up with is to use IPCS to view the TIOT and JFCB, or to run the DSAB chain. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.g

Re: z/OSMF desktop

- I found z/OSMF frustrating. I wrote a post on a practical guide to get it working as it is not very well designed for digital certificates. - The server certificate they create is badly defined, mis