hi,
m4 is text substitution. 25 years ago we used it to create web pages. The same text to create the
web and a a paper version. when you give some company "flyer" (5 pages) to clients, you may be
interested to have semantically very similar info in the web, don't you.
m4 was also used in the
On 6/04/2021 1:23 am, Charles Mills wrote:
But IMHO none easy to learn or use.
I am generally not a fan of meta languages at all. I think writing programs is
hard enough, without having to write two effective programs: one that runs at
compile time and one that runs at run time.
In my C++, wh
You can disable that using HMC features (it is called Optical Network
Errors or similar).
However DON'T DO IT.
This is symptom of some problem. It can be pinched FO cable, dirty
connector or failing SFP module.
Unfortunately it is almost good, so there is no simple way to know
whether cable cha
This page provides the life cycle dates for all z/OS V2 releases.
https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=dd&subtype=sm&appname=ShopzSeries&htmlfid=897/ENUS5650-ZOS
Likewise this page for the z/OS V1 releases:
https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=dd&subt
> You don't use templates
I certainly do use templates. Not sure how you get "don't use templates" from
what I wrote. Heck, I *over* used templates in the first large C++ project I
ever did, and boy, does that make a mess! Now I think I am down to a happy
medium. I don't see them as "competitiv
On Apr 5, 2021, at 8:40 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> Actually, the lack of a metalanguage is the norm except for assemblers; PL/I
> is an exception in that regard. Ada, Go, Java, Perl, Python, Ruby, Raku (Perl
> 6), Rust, etc., lack metalanguages.
One might argue that Python and Ruby (at leas
They have introspection but not a macro language; macro languages have been
written using introspection. I believe that LISP was the first to have
introspection.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion Lis
I don't know about the OP, but I'd love to have something going back to
IBSYS/IBJOB that I could cite in wikipedia articles.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf
W dniu 06.04.2021 o 15:45, Kurt Quackenbush pisze:
This page provides the life cycle dates for all z/OS V2 releases.
https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?infotype=dd&subtype=sm&appname=ShopzSeries&htmlfid=897/ENUS5650-ZOS
Likewise this page for the z/OS V1 releases:
https://www-
Would someone please provide me with the BPX "stuff" to auto-magically
allocate a
ZFS for a user when they first go into ISH?
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to l
On one system (different JES2 MAS), our STCs while executing only show this
line in SDSF.
STMT NO. MESSAGE
2 IEFC001I PROCEDURE XX WAS EXPANDED USING SYSTEM LIBRARY ..
But on other systems it's showing much more.
STMT NO. MESSAGE
2 IEFC001I PROCEDURE X WAS EXPANDED USING SYS
in /etc/u.map
name *
type ZFS
filesystem omvs.u.sysplexname./ZFS < site specific
mode RDWR
parm rwshare,converttyov5 <- that's me
duration 1
delay 10
allocany space(10,5) cyl
setuid no
security yes
I think that's all then run the automount command pointing to auto.master
Mark what OS release is the first example?
IIRC the message was expanded with JES2 z/os 2.3
Carmen Vitullo
-Original Message-
From: Mark <0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN
Date: Tuesday, 6 April 2021 2:34 PM CDT
Subject: STC JESYSMSG Quandry
On one
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:24:43 -0500, Steve Beaver wrote:
>Would someone please provide me with the BPX "stuff" to auto-magically
>allocate a
>
>ZFS for a user when they first go into ISH?
>
See also:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.2.0?topic=unix-enabling-automatic-assignment-unique-identiti
responding to myself, the IEFA111I message is stating either the ALLOCxx member
settings or system defaults for ALLOCxx
Carmen Vitullo
-Original Message-
From: Carmen
To: IBM-MAIN
Date: Tuesday, 6 April 2021 3:04 PM CDT
Subject: Re: STC JESYSMSG Quandry
Mark what OS release
Both systems are z/OS 2.4.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, April 6th, 2021 at 4:03 PM, Carmen Vitullo
wrote:
> Mark what
Hello,
I understand that ideally I would find the error - but all the values seem
correct in my eyes.
The optical values are fine, no errors shown on the interfaces, etc.
This bugs me a bit. I did not have this issue when it was connected to
another mainframe, but it has it now...
Regards,
On T
that blows my theory - I only have one JES2 MAS and first saw these messages
with z/OS 2.3, in SDSF maybe INPUT ON Vs. INPUT OFF ?
Carmen Vitullo
-Original Message-
From: Mark <0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN
Date: Tuesday, 6 April 2021 3:12 P
Input on;
DDNAME StepName ProcStep DsID
JESJCLIN 1
JESMSGLG JES2CI01 2
JESJCL JES2CI01 3
JESYSMSG JES2CI01 4
$INTTEXT JES2CI01 5
$SWABLKS JES2CI01 7
EVENTLOG JES2CI01 8
Input off
DDNAME StepName Pr
We've got it!
"when it was connected to another mainframe, but it has it now"
So something has changed. This is the most likely moment for error.
Now it's time for investigation - what cable is new, what is old, what
plug was inserted, etc.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
(looking for new job)
Lodz, Polan
On 4/6/21 2:08 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Bur if you have a mixture of OMVS and other UNIX, try to make the
UID/GID agree across systems.
I absolutely agree that consistent UID & GID are a Good Thing™.
But, sometimes that's no small task. I've seen Unix shops spend a LOT
of time, effort, and
The Marriage of Two Mainframes via Optical link ...
Something old
Something new
Something borrowed?
Something BIG BLUE
Chris Hoelscher
Lead Sys DBA
IBM Global Technical Services on assignmemt to Humana Inc.
T 502.476.2538 or 502.407.7266
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussio
Is the default MSGLEVEL different?
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=mp-subparameter-definition-6
JOB statement MSGLEVEL=(1,1) should print everything.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 2:34 PM Mark Jacobs
<0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> On one system (different JES2 MA
Cables dirty - have you cleaned the ends of the cables and the FSPs?
I see you have the Brocade negotiating down to 2 Gb to talk to the 6800. Can
you try forcing the Brocade port to 2 Gb instead of using autonegotiate? I
seem to recall eons ago having an issue on some HP equipment where we n
The system that is showing the output.
$DSTCCLASS,LONG
$HASP837 STCCLASS
$HASP837 STCCLASS AUTH=(ALL),BLP=YES,COMMAND=EXECUTE,
$HASP837 CONDPURG=NO,DSENQSHR=ALLOW,IEFUJP=YES,
$HASP837 IEFUSO=YES,JESLOG=(NOSPIN),LOG=YES,
$HASP837 MSGLEVEL=(1,1),MSGCLASS=A,OUTDISP=(HOL
Dear Kumar,
We are in the process to implement automation in WAS v9 to deploy EAR file
without any manual intervention.
For this, we created monitored directory and enabled Global deployment
option using WAS console.
Now, we have couple of issues to be addressed.
1 ) How to update any a
26 matches
Mail list logo
