https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/fix-list-and-new-features-enterprise-cobol-zos
Shows Cobol 6.3 has AMODE 64 PTFs.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 1:35 PM Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
>
> Barry,
>
> Looks like you are on the right track with regard to XPLINK being the
> difference. 31-bit COBOL does not hav
The path that does SVC 99 of the output file works fine
It’s the path that uses tso ALLOC that gives me the s0c9
All the other logic is the same before I submit the job that populates the
output file I do a free fi and when I use SVC 99 I have text unit closeua
meaning when I closed the file it
> I got a soc9 divide exception
S0C9 abend is usually due to divide by zero. So did you check if you are
performing any calculations and if all the variables have a non-zero
values? you said you are allocating a file. Did you make sure that it has
a valid LRECL on the SVC99 call?
Thanks,
Kolusu
I got a soc9 divide exception
This abend is from my job joseph.reich...@irs.gov except I cannt post from that
email
You mentioned sysprint however I don’t remember allocating it in either case
It seems that the file I want to browse just has to be pointed to my Rexx
variable filein
It also se
I understand the issue with primary sources. Mills Computer Company could
announce a perpetual motion machine and publish documentation for it. That
would be a primary source, yet for an obviously fictitious thing. You would
have trouble, however, finding a press article or a SHARE presentation tha
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021, at 20:28, Joseph Reichman wrote:
> If the input is multiple files then I allocate the output via ADDRESS TSO
> “ALLOC
Why? I mean, by all means decide the name of the output file(s) before you
build the JCL, but let the JCL allocate it/them.
> File manger abends trying
Joseph,
You haven't really shown the abend messages you are getting. Taking an
educated guess, you probably had a mismatch of the file attributes. The
SYSPRINT dd for file manager has the following attributes
LRECL = 32756, BLKSIZE = 32760, RECFM = VBA
Thanks,
Kolusu
Hi
I have a Rexx exec which implement a program that does a search for data and
writes the result to a output file
The exec takes 2 paths depending if the input dsn is a wild card type like 3.4
In this case the input can be many 10’s or 100 of files
Or the input can be one file
If the inp
Would you have articles, life cycle dates or announcement letters for any of
5645-001
5647-A01
5655-068
5655-069
5665-284
5665-291
5665-293
5665-295
5665-327
5665-329
5665-XA2
5665-XA3
5685-001
5685-002
5685-047
5685-048
5694-A01
5695-DF1
5740-AM3
5740-AM7
5740-AM8
5740-SM1
5740-XC6
5740-XE1
5740
CW and Datamation articles on IBM announcements should satisfy wiki's Mickey
Mouse requirements.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Charles Mills [charl...
I mis-stated one thing. I don't get the NOCALL/NEVERCALL warning in the 64-bit
XPLINK case, which explains why RC=0 instead of 4.
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 13:35:27 -0500, Frank Swarbrick
wrote:
>Barry,
>
>Looks like you are on the right track with regard to XPLINK being the
>difference. 31-bit C
Barry,
Looks like you are on the right track with regard to XPLINK being the
difference. 31-bit COBOL does not have XPLINK support, so I can't test that,
but 64-bit COBOL uses only XPLINK. If you try to do a static link of a 64-bit
XPLINK application to the 64-bit stub in SCSFSTUB it fails:
I
Hello Alain,
GRS doesn't support ALLOWAUTOALT (via it's IXLCONN request). The ISGLOCK
str is purely a LOCK STR, it does not contain any record elements, so it will
never fill. If the structure is undersized, the worse thing that will happen
is that your FALSE CONTENTION rate will increase.
[Default] On 12 Aug 2021 10:00:05 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
wilc...@us.ibm.com (Glenn Wilcock) wrote:
>We've been vexed with this for some time. We, the DFSMS org, have wanted to
>update this for some time. But, we've run into these same issues, probably
>even more so since we are the pr
Especially for earlier products, what about press coverage? I am old enough to
remember when Computerworld breathlessly covered mainframe announcements.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Glenn Wilcock
Sent: Thur
We've been vexed with this for some time. We, the DFSMS org, have wanted to
update this for some time. But, we've run into these same issues, probably
even more so since we are the product owners. So, first, thanks so much for
working on this! SHARE presentations are a good idea, but wonderi
Frank,
I suspect that I tried out the restricted no-call LIBRARY statements with
XPLINK C programs, because there I do not get the IEW2455W message. I'm pretty
sure you should not get that message for NOXPLINK either, whether it be C or
COBOL. (It's not obvious to me why it's happening, but t
I believe you are correct. It's one of those things that is a bad idea
even if it does seem to work.
Eric Rossman, CISSP®
ICSF Cryptographic Security Development
z/OS Enabling Technologies
edros...@us.ibm.com
"IBM Mainframe Discussion List" wrote on
08/12/2021 12:13:39 PM:
> From: "Barry Lich
Hi everyone,
I would like to test the effect of the option ALLOWAUTOALT=YES in a coupling
for a specific structure and decided to do it with teh ISGLOCK with a sandbox
systems. So, I defined the minimum value for this one and rebuild it. From
report monitor III, I can see only fulfilled at 0.1%.
Eric,
To the best of my knowledge SYS1.SIEALNKE members are not intended to be linked
directly into programs.
SYS1.CSSLIB (or other component-specific libraries like LE's CEE.SCEELKED)
should have the stubs for their functions. SYS1.SIEALNKE is one of the
datasets which are by default part of
Was wondering when the B-word would be dropped... for me to then ask... is this
a case for something like Raft consesus protocol?
I'm talking only theory-wise. As far as solving the OP's problem, it may be a
bit of a tangential thought.
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, August
Follow up:
The issue is that SLIP will use the LAST defined SLIP that matches, and does
not look for the most specific match. And that is documented.
I put a generic SLIP to not dump for anything that didn't match my specific
entries. The sequence that the SLIPs are issued is critical.
On Fri,
Hi Larry,
lets connect directly through your IBM contacts.
Denis.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Zhang <03b304d39e8e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wed, Aug 11, 2021 10:27 pm
Subject: Re: Connecting to IMS DB in SpringBoot
Any insigts on this error:
Thank you all for your informative answers!
Steff
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 at 12:19, Timothy Sipples wrote:
> Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
> >Looking through the various answers here, I note that someone has
> >mentioned the need for some kind of security, so that others cannot
> >trigger actions t
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
>Looking through the various answers here, I note that someone has
>mentioned the need for some kind of security, so that others cannot
>trigger actions they are not supposed to.
>I think those security issues conflict with your requirement to run
>synchronisation with
25 matches
Mail list logo
