On 6/13/2022 4:28 PM, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw wrote:
Isn't that similar to the JES3 IATXCSF macro?
Indeed it is (and the J3PXCSF macro too)!
--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
My guess is that the instantiation is a POST to the subtask related ECB and a
WAIT on the other main task ECB (perhaps related to the subtask) and the undo
is the reverse.
Correct?
At any rate, I wanted to allow task! a quantum of processing time before
allowing task2 to continue. After that I
Isn't that similar to the JES3 IATXCSF macro?
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
https://rsclweb.com
‘Dance like no one is watching. Encrypt like everyone is.’
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed
Jaffe
Sent: 13 June 2022 20:54
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
I should be able to find this on my own, but so far I've failed. What sysplex
functionally gets unlocked once the sysplex couple dataset is formatted with
cluster support?
Mark Jacobs
Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com), Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
RACF doesn't know, so once you've deleted the GRANT from DB2 I don’t know of a
way to find out what you lost (unless you can get it from a backup). But there
are tables in DB2 that list all GRANTs, so you can export those to, say, Excel
and do some sorting and other munging to get a sensible
The TSS manual (v15) says it starts by looking for, simply, the longest
resource name:
/* Quote begins */
To determine the longest resource name, each character in the resource name
counts as one character whether it is a normal character or a masking
character. If the floating mask “-“ is
You can't count on anything like that. Each task competes. But if the task
is already set up, my question is more like "What's stopping it from
running already?"
I don't think I'm getting how you want these tasks to work together. I'll
carry on regardless:-
If the other task already has all it
Once you decide you can't fail back to old production, be sure to
establish the new PPRC direction.
If you IPL on the new dasd before setting up the PPRC you'll have to
copy the new primaries back.
If you swap before IPL at the new production site then you don't have
to copy the new primaries to
The following scenario: DB2 v12 using pre-RACF (GRANT/REVOKE) security.
Of course userids and groupids are taken from RACF.
There are several groups which are candidates to delete as they look as
not needed. However some of them have DB2 GRANTs, so those groups should
not be deleted.
So far,
Lennie,
No problem, nobody's perfect, even Jack Lemmon. ;-)
I always appreciated your input. Please, continue.
Regards
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 13.06.2022 o 10:35, Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw pisze:
Radoslaw,
Apologies for my derelict statements below. Obviously I was suffering
On 6/13/2022 9:21 AM, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
Is there a service similar to TCTL so that a task can give control to another
task?
We wrote our own. If you issue this internal macro (let's call it
SUBTASK), the next instruction after the macro is running in a subtask.
If you issue SUBTASK
On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 14:59, Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
>
> I don't know if one can count on the ATTACHed task getting control before the
> ATTACH completes.
I'm sure you can't. Even if it, in theory, has control, how it gets
dispatched is surely not part of the specification.
> I am trying to
Hello
Good morning to all
Due to a business reason we are swapping our mainframer sites where the
current DR machine will be converted to production and Production machine
will be a DR site. I understand these exercise are mostly done by the IBM
CE from support element. Is there anything to be
I don't know if one can count on the ATTACHed task getting control before the
ATTACH completes.
I am trying to directly pass control to a ready enabled task (from the task
that did a POST).
On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 19:05:50 +0100 Rupert Reynolds
wrote:
:>Back in the MVS days I might use ATTACH EP=
We're looking to rollout a z/OSMF 2.4 configuration from our test environment
to our user-acceptance environment.
Hoping to not have to start from scratch.
Just wondering if anyone had any rules-of-thumb, procedures, or advice in
general for rolling it into an n'th environment
while changing
Ok.. did anyone consider using FTP to separate the files? You can do the
1,2,3,4,etc for the sysout and then rename each one?
Which could be done in a uss script (yes.. I said it.)
HTH,
Rob
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 3:56 PM Rob Scott wrote:
> Forgot to point out that the SDSF Rexx documentation
Back in the MVS days I might use ATTACH EP= (or EPLOC=) to set up the task.
Or is the task ready running?
Roops
On Mon, 13 Jun 2022, 17:21 Binyamin Dissen,
wrote:
> Is there a service similar to TCTL so that a task can give control to
> another
> task?
>
> I guess I could schedule an SRB to
Is there a service similar to TCTL so that a task can give control to another
task?
I guess I could schedule an SRB to do it but it would seem that there should
be an easier way.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 1:09 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Can you start to a new window as an alternative to a new tab? That was my
> common use case for WSA.
>
No, not as far as I can tell. Tabs or splits only.
>
> Also, what is performance like?
>
It's OK, not as fast as TN3270. But I am
The unit still does have the two mini pc HMCs. I am not too concerned about the
optics, as this can be fixed quite easily (either by putting a new card in the
mainframe, or just hooking it up to a cheap ficon switch). I know that none of
the components have been pulled, other than the drives,
In the past, the company i worked for used to have ControlT. Amazing product,
with a very nice user interface
Best Regards
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
z/OS System Programmer
Em segunda-feira, 13 de junho de 2022 08:54:57 BRT, Jack Zukt
escreveu:
The tso/ispf one. I have not seen
Hi,
If by any chance your ACS routine is defining the dataset as multivolume, the
additional entries in catalog, even if not used, will occupy a TIOT slot.
Best Regards
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
z/OS System Programmer
Em segunda-feira, 13 de junho de 2022 09:32:12 BRT, Seymour J Metz
What size volumes are you using? EAV might help you reduce the number of
extents.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Ron
Thomas [ron5...@gmail.com]
Sent:
The tso/ispf one. I have not seen the zosmf one yet.
Jack
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022, 05:21 Timothy Sipples wrote:
> Jack Zukt wrote:
> >Between those three, I would say that rmm has an unfriendly user
> interface,
> >but I suppose that is just the IBM way. I really liked Control-M ease of
> >use.
In addition to the excellent points made by Timothy, you will have to do
additional checks.
It seems that this DS8K might have been used to sell off individual components
as 'spares'.
Does it still have the embedded HMC?
What type of FICON adaptors does it have (SX or LX). From previous
Radoslaw,
Apologies for my derelict statements below. Obviously I was suffering
brain-fade.
My first encounters with protected key processing are shown in this redbook.
https://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247848.html?Open
There are examples there of using protected keys with the CSNBSYE
Well, let's make it the TSS rule.
*| **Itschak Mugzach | Director | SecuriTeam Software **|** IronSphere
Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring for Z/OS, zLinux
and IBM I **| *
*|* *Email**: i_mugz...@securiteam.co.il **|* *Mob**: +972 522 986404 **|*
*Skype**: ItschakMugzach
27 matches
Mail list logo
