Re: Cloud Storage

2023-10-31 Thread David Crayford
> On 1 Nov 2023, at 10:34 am, Jon Perryman wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 08:48:03 +0800, David Crayford wrote: > >> Sorry, OMEGAMON is a Rocket product. I know that because I work on it. >> So is SDSF, RMF, DB2 utilities, DB2 connect, IMS tools etc, etc. >> IBM have the core subsystems but th

Re: Cloud Storage

2023-10-31 Thread Jon Perryman
On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 08:48:03 +0800, David Crayford wrote: > Sorry, OMEGAMON is a Rocket product. I know that because I work on it. > So is SDSF, RMF, DB2 utilities, DB2 connect, IMS tools etc, etc. > IBM have the core subsystems but the critical tools are owned by vendors. It's sad that IBM is

Re: SCHEDIRB Jon Perryman is correct re-linked as AC=1 no ABEND ON SVC 8

2023-10-31 Thread Doug Fuerst
This will be the last thing I say on this subject. I am NOT calling anyone "out." I am simply asking...nicely,,, that this thread stop, and with it, the vituperative comments, insults, nastiness, etc. that seems to permeate this forum lately. From EVERYONE! Please, don't we have enough of t

Re: Cloud Storage

2023-10-31 Thread David Crayford
> On 1 Nov 2023, at 8:24 am, zMan wrote: > > Actually IBM keeps selling off products *and not telling the customers*. > VSE they admitted; Optim and a bunch more, they have not. You can find the > acquiring company if you look (often UNICOM), but I find it sleazy that > they do this and continue

Re: Cloud Storage

2023-10-31 Thread zMan
Actually IBM keeps selling off products *and not telling the customers*. VSE they admitted; Optim and a bunch more, they have not. You can find the acquiring company if you look (often UNICOM), but I find it sleazy that they do this and continue to market the products without customers knowing that

Re: SCHEDIRB Jon Perryman is correct re-linked as AC=1 no ABEND ON SVC 8

2023-10-31 Thread Jon Perryman
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 23:15:44 +, Doug Fuerst wrote: >I am not OK with any of it, and after Mr. Johnson, I suspect the list is >not as well. I'm also not ok with this but it's Crayford you should be calling out. By ignoring his insults the first couple of times, I showed far more respect and

Re: SCHEDIRB Jon Perryman is correct re-linked as AC=1 no ABEND ON SVC 8

2023-10-31 Thread Doug Fuerst
I am not OK with any of it, and after Mr. Johnson, I suspect the list is not as well. I'd just like it to be kept civil, and limited to real exchanges of technical issues. I hope you all realize that you can take this off the forum and discuss amongst yourselves. But let's try and keep this c

Capacity control for the win (not)

2023-10-31 Thread Phil Smith III
Ring/Alexa are a bit overwhelmed tonight-I'm getting alerts 10 minutes after the doorbell actually rang. Shoulda used CICS. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.ed

Re: SCHEDIRB Jon Perryman is correct re-linked as AC=1 no ABEND ON SVC 8

2023-10-31 Thread Jon Perryman
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 21:53:36 +, Doug Fuerst wrote: >Did we just trade Bill Johnson for Jon Perryman? Are you two related? We >are back to backbiting and insults. >Can we just stop? If I'm showing a pattern of being confused or being constantly wrong (as claimed by Crayford), please show me

Re: SCHEDIRB Jon Perryman is correct re-linked as AC=1 no ABEND ON SVC 8

2023-10-31 Thread Doug Fuerst
Did we just trade Bill Johnson for Jon Perryman? Are you two related? We are back to backbiting and insults. Can we just stop? Doug Fuerst -- Original Message -- From "Jon Perryman" To IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date 10/31/2023 17:34:02 PM Subject Re: SCHEDIRB Jon Perryman is correc

Re: SCHEDIRB Jon Perryman is correct re-linked as AC=1 no ABEND ON SVC 8

2023-10-31 Thread Jon Perryman
On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 14:35:45 +, Peter Relson wrote: > As this related to a purported need to link with AC=1, > I was perfectly sure that that was not correct. And I remain so. Is it truly a coincidence that this group failed in 1 week to solve a simple SCHEDIRB and LOAD failing when shortly

What is HMEX or FMEX?

2023-10-31 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka
BCPii HWIC2ASM mapping or HWIC2REX contains the following names: HWMCA_FMEX_OPERATING_MODE HWMCA_HMEX_OPERATING_MODE HWMCA_HMAS_OPERATING_MODE and several others, like HWMCA_CF_OPERATING_MODE, HWMCA_LINUX_OPERATING_MODE or HWMCA_GENERAL_OPERATING_MODE It is obvious the names describe the opera

Re: Cloud Storage

2023-10-31 Thread Jon Perryman
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 16:51:42 +0800, David Crayford wrote: > I think you’re confused again John. To the contrary, it is you again who is confused. > IBM don’t own the vast majority of the z/OS products they sell. > They are either developed by vendors or have been sold to vendors. > This has b

Re: FTP problem

2023-10-31 Thread Phil Smith III
Wendell Lovewell wrote: >fwiw, I wrote a bash script to run gsktrace and ftp it to a Windows >FTP server. (I connect to z/OS using SSH to run it.) Thanks.if I had a Windows FTP server (which I don't, despite my original post), this would be great. I do a LOT of ftp -i TO this system, some FROM it

Re: FTP problem

2023-10-31 Thread Wendell Lovewell
fwiw, I wrote a bash script to run gsktrace and ftp it to a Windows FTP server. (I connect to z/OS using SSH to run it.) >cat gskput #!/bin/bash HOST='winpc' USER='winuserid' PASSWD='winpwd' cd /tmp rm /tmp/gsk.out gsktrace /tmp/gskmack.trc > /tmp/gsk.out ftp -n -v $HOST << EOT ascii user $USE

Re: Cloud Storage

2023-10-31 Thread David Crayford
> On 31 Oct 2023, at 8:42 am, Jon Perryman wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:35:39 +0100, Jack Zukt wrote: > >> Is there anyone out there using cloud storage for backup or dataset >> migration, using IBM Cloud Tape Connector for z/OS or Model9? > > I did a quick search and found an IBM present