Re: Cloud Storage

2023-10-31 Thread David Crayford
> On 1 Nov 2023, at 10:34 am, Jon Perryman wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 08:48:03 +0800, David Crayford wrote: > >> Sorry, OMEGAMON is a Rocket product. I know that because I work on it. >> So is SDSF, RMF, DB2 utilities, DB2 connect, IMS tools etc, etc. >> IBM have the core subsystems but

Re: Cloud Storage

2023-10-31 Thread Jon Perryman
On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 08:48:03 +0800, David Crayford wrote: > Sorry, OMEGAMON is a Rocket product. I know that because I work on it. > So is SDSF, RMF, DB2 utilities, DB2 connect, IMS tools etc, etc. > IBM have the core subsystems but the critical tools are owned by vendors. It's sad that IBM is

Re: SCHEDIRB Jon Perryman is correct re-linked as AC=1 no ABEND ON SVC 8

2023-10-31 Thread Doug Fuerst
This will be the last thing I say on this subject. I am NOT calling anyone "out." I am simply asking...nicely,,, that this thread stop, and with it, the vituperative comments, insults, nastiness, etc. that seems to permeate this forum lately. From EVERYONE! Please, don't we have enough of

Re: Cloud Storage

2023-10-31 Thread David Crayford
> On 1 Nov 2023, at 8:24 am, zMan wrote: > > Actually IBM keeps selling off products *and not telling the customers*. > VSE they admitted; Optim and a bunch more, they have not. You can find the > acquiring company if you look (often UNICOM), but I find it sleazy that > they do this and continue

Re: Cloud Storage

2023-10-31 Thread zMan
Actually IBM keeps selling off products *and not telling the customers*. VSE they admitted; Optim and a bunch more, they have not. You can find the acquiring company if you look (often UNICOM), but I find it sleazy that they do this and continue to market the products without customers knowing

Re: SCHEDIRB Jon Perryman is correct re-linked as AC=1 no ABEND ON SVC 8

2023-10-31 Thread Jon Perryman
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 23:15:44 +, Doug Fuerst wrote: >I am not OK with any of it, and after Mr. Johnson, I suspect the list is >not as well. I'm also not ok with this but it's Crayford you should be calling out. By ignoring his insults the first couple of times, I showed far more respect

Re: SCHEDIRB Jon Perryman is correct re-linked as AC=1 no ABEND ON SVC 8

2023-10-31 Thread Doug Fuerst
I am not OK with any of it, and after Mr. Johnson, I suspect the list is not as well. I'd just like it to be kept civil, and limited to real exchanges of technical issues. I hope you all realize that you can take this off the forum and discuss amongst yourselves. But let's try and keep this

Capacity control for the win (not)

2023-10-31 Thread Phil Smith III
Ring/Alexa are a bit overwhelmed tonight-I'm getting alerts 10 minutes after the doorbell actually rang. Shoulda used CICS. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: SCHEDIRB Jon Perryman is correct re-linked as AC=1 no ABEND ON SVC 8

2023-10-31 Thread Jon Perryman
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 21:53:36 +, Doug Fuerst wrote: >Did we just trade Bill Johnson for Jon Perryman? Are you two related? We >are back to backbiting and insults. >Can we just stop? If I'm showing a pattern of being confused or being constantly wrong (as claimed by Crayford), please show

Re: SCHEDIRB Jon Perryman is correct re-linked as AC=1 no ABEND ON SVC 8

2023-10-31 Thread Doug Fuerst
Did we just trade Bill Johnson for Jon Perryman? Are you two related? We are back to backbiting and insults. Can we just stop? Doug Fuerst -- Original Message -- From "Jon Perryman" To IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date 10/31/2023 17:34:02 PM Subject Re: SCHEDIRB Jon Perryman is

Re: SCHEDIRB Jon Perryman is correct re-linked as AC=1 no ABEND ON SVC 8

2023-10-31 Thread Jon Perryman
On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 14:35:45 +, Peter Relson wrote: > As this related to a purported need to link with AC=1, > I was perfectly sure that that was not correct. And I remain so. Is it truly a coincidence that this group failed in 1 week to solve a simple SCHEDIRB and LOAD failing when

What is HMEX or FMEX?

2023-10-31 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka
BCPii HWIC2ASM mapping or HWIC2REX contains the following names: HWMCA_FMEX_OPERATING_MODE HWMCA_HMEX_OPERATING_MODE HWMCA_HMAS_OPERATING_MODE and several others, like HWMCA_CF_OPERATING_MODE, HWMCA_LINUX_OPERATING_MODE or HWMCA_GENERAL_OPERATING_MODE It is obvious the names describe the

Re: Cloud Storage

2023-10-31 Thread Jon Perryman
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 16:51:42 +0800, David Crayford wrote: > I think you’re confused again John. To the contrary, it is you again who is confused. > IBM don’t own the vast majority of the z/OS products they sell. > They are either developed by vendors or have been sold to vendors. > This has

Re: FTP problem

2023-10-31 Thread Phil Smith III
Wendell Lovewell wrote: >fwiw, I wrote a bash script to run gsktrace and ftp it to a Windows >FTP server. (I connect to z/OS using SSH to run it.) Thanks.if I had a Windows FTP server (which I don't, despite my original post), this would be great. I do a LOT of ftp -i TO this system, some FROM

Re: FTP problem

2023-10-31 Thread Wendell Lovewell
fwiw, I wrote a bash script to run gsktrace and ftp it to a Windows FTP server. (I connect to z/OS using SSH to run it.) >cat gskput #!/bin/bash HOST='winpc' USER='winuserid' PASSWD='winpwd' cd /tmp rm /tmp/gsk.out gsktrace /tmp/gskmack.trc > /tmp/gsk.out ftp -n -v $HOST << EOT ascii user

Re: Cloud Storage

2023-10-31 Thread David Crayford
> On 31 Oct 2023, at 8:42 am, Jon Perryman wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:35:39 +0100, Jack Zukt wrote: > >> Is there anyone out there using cloud storage for backup or dataset >> migration, using IBM Cloud Tape Connector for z/OS or Model9? > > I did a quick search and found an IBM