Hello Rob
Thank you so much for your response
Could you please point to your presentation on migrating off from ISFPRMXX
to RACF ?
Fortunately our shop is very small and we don't have any archiving tool or
any automation tool.
Peter
On Sat, Dec 2, 2023, 9:55 PM Rob Scott wrote:
> Peter,
>
>
Hey, I didn't say we don't ~want~ better rates. I didn't even say we don't
deserve them (though I might if pressed. I don't use the word "deserve"
casually). I said only that we don't need them - and added that I was speaking
strictly for myself :).
When I was an employee I'd been at the sam
Let me get this right: Companies will pay their lawyers $750 an hour and
up, but the people that write the code to keep their businesses running,
that do the support work to keep those businesses running, us they want
to pay $45 an hour for, and give us a list of skills they want a mile
long.
I
Whether it is a work for hire depends on a lot of variables. Generally
speaking, if it is part of your regular duties or if it is a deliverable in a
contract you signed, then it is a work for hire, otherwise it belongs to you.
Best practice is to discuss the issue up front and sign a contract sp
The Devil is in the details. several US companies ask you to sign away your
intellectual property rights; I've found that they are willing to accept
changes if they are reasonable. It's prudent for both the employee and the
employer to be clear up front who owns what up front.
--
Shmuel (Seymou
Again, I'm speaking only for myself, but I definitely think we DON'T "need"
better terms. I have a great job that pays me more money than I spend for
doing what I wanted to do anyway.
(Not that I'd insist on giving back some of it if folks insist on offering
more. But I don't want to ride the
We need a better union. Maybe Fran Drescher is available. Actors have
better terms. Former Nanny's apparently can get them.
We need better terms.
Doug Fuerst
-- Original Message --
From "Mike Schwab"
To IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date 12/2/2023 16:11:33 PM
Subject Re: Assembler progr
If you wrote it while employed or under hourly contract its a work for hire
and company owns. If paid for a finish product or during off duty time you
have the copyright and resellable, but strongly suggested to incle the
copyright assignment in the sales contract.
On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 2:37 PM
Maybe we should ask for residuals for our creative property like actors.
We give it all away too easily.
What would happen if we all went on strike?
Interesting thought
Doug Fuerst
-- Original Message --
From "Bob Bridges"
To IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date 12/2/2023 15:30:51 PM
Can't speak for anyone else, but I usually just take (or turn down) the first
offer, mostly I think out of poor self-image. Not sure why, because I don't
mind dickering over a car.
The only exception I can remember off-hand is when a consulting company that
employed me was looking to cut costs
++ even if it was still supported.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Rob
Scott
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2023 12:54 PM
To: I
How many programmers negotiate when a recruiter contacts them with a lowball
offer, and how many just move it to the circular file? When I'm looking for
people, I don't want to scare away good candidates with an offer that might
offend them; I ask "What are you looking for?".
--
Shmuel (Seymou
Peter,
Can I strongly suggest you instigate a project to activate OPERCMDS (and
JESSPOOL if not already active).
ISFPRMx just controls actions within SDSF and does not preclude any
semi-capable programmer from writing code to issue operator commands (or access
SYSOUT using the JES SSI).
Star
Hello All
Good morning
I have planned to install zOSMF in our test LPAR. Our SDSF uses its own
security features using ISFPRMXX and I can see zOSMF has its own IZUSEC
jobs where it activates OPERCMDS class. We never activated OPERCMDS instead
we manage using ISFPRMXX PARMLIB member.
Is there any
14 matches
Mail list logo
