On Tue, 28 May 2024 16:22:02 -0700, Tom Brennan wrote:
>Or a user-created mount script at IPL time, which is what we did. We
>didn't have a whole lot in BPXPRMxx, as I remember.
>
I suppose the question for the OP is, "Why?"
SYSLOG?
>On 5/28/2024 11:24 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 M
Or a user-created mount script at IPL time, which is what we did. We
didn't have a whole lot in BPXPRMxx, as I remember.
On 5/28/2024 11:24 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2024 17:13:21 +, Mark Jacobs wrote:
Are there any tools/products/methods to assist in ascertain whether the
=6
OMVS
df -k
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
=6
OMVS
df -k
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mark Jacobs
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2024 1:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Mounted file systems vs BPXPRMxx
ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or
click
I don't have anything to test on so I'll trust you
Lionel B. Dyck <><
Github: https://github.com/lbdyck
System Z Enthusiasts Discord: https://discord.gg/sze
“Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what you
are, reputation merely what others think you are.” - - -
Lionel, My experience is only shows missing, or mount options that don’t match
parmlib. Nothing “new”.
Dave Jousma
Vice President | Director, Technology Engineering
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Lionel B. Dyck <057b0ee5a853-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Date: Tues
If you have health checker running and sdsf then use the SDSF HC command and
look at the USS_PARMLIB display which should let you know of changes
(add/change/remove) to mounted filesystems.
I learned this from Steven Perva over on the System Z Enthusiasts discord 😊
Lionel B. Dyck <><
Github:
On Tue, 28 May 2024 17:13:21 +, Mark Jacobs wrote:
>Are there any tools/products/methods to assist in ascertain whether there are
>any manually mounted file systems that aren't in a BPXPRMxx member. I know we
>can get a list of file systems that are mounted in the sysplex and use brute
>for
One option is to audit the UNIXPRIV class resource SUPERUSER.FILESYS.MOUNT
security call to monitor mount command usage.
Wayne Driscoll
Broadcom Software
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 12:50 PM Lionel B. Dyck <
057b0ee5a853-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
And ISPF 3.17 also has an option to show all mounted filesystems by either
mount point or file system name. There are also some zfs tools that can show
you what is mounted, including usage info. But nothing that will compare the
currently mounted filesystems with what's defined in the PARMLIB BPXPR
Not aware of anything, but will point out there is the SDSF “FS” option to
display all mounted file systems.
Dave Jousma
Vice President | Director, Technology Engineering
Are there any tools/products/methods to assist in ascertain whether there are
any manually mounted file systems that aren
That sounds like an interesting exercise.
Can you join the System Z Enthusiasts discord (https://discord.gg/sze) and then
direct message me and maybe we can work something out.
Lionel B. Dyck <><
Github: https://github.com/lbdyck
System Z Enthusiasts Discord: https://discord.gg/sze
“Worry mor
Are there any tools/products/methods to assist in ascertain whether there are
any manually mounted file systems that aren't in a BPXPRMxx member. I know we
can get a list of file systems that are mounted in the sysplex and use brute
force to compare it against BPXPRMxx but was wondering if someo
And just to make you laugh/groan/cry, from a book I read last night (fiction),
someone commenting on an encoded transmission:
"I'm pretty sure it's eight-bit ASCII, also known as UTF-8"
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Tony Harminc
Sent: Tuesday, May 2
Well, thanks. This has been interesting, with at least the typical amount of
thread drift!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 09:44, Paul Gilmartin <
042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> [...]
> Should I Imagine that originally EBCDIC had no btackets
> and two customer cultures improvised, independently?
>
I'm not sure to what extent it was customer cultures vs the infamous
mul
Tom
It is not difficult to imagine code from 2005 using user-key common storage as
that was not as well known as a security/integrity problem to the wide world as
it is now.
No-one in the right mind would develop using user-key CSA these days.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software
-Original Message--
On Tue, 28 May 2024 08:43:25 -0400, Rick Troth wrote:
>
>... CP37 came first, and was "close" but got the square
>brackets wrong (as most US installations used them).
>
How did that happen? The first PoOps I saw contained
an EBCDIC code map. I coded to it. The brackets
printed wrong on our
What do you mean by "code modified to solve the RUCSA problem"?
IIRC, RUCSA was introduced with z/OS 2.4, in 2020.
It is difficult to imagine a presentation in 2005 or 2012 that would have
talked about it.
--
Tom Marchant
On Sat, 25 May 2024 13:18:55 -0500, Stefan Lezzi
wrote:
>Hi again,
>
Bingo!
I remember that pain well.
But I was on CMS and could do a pair of 'SET OUTPUT' commands to get
proper behavior with a 3279. (And matching 'SET INPUT' commands.)
If you're on ISPF then I don't know what to tell ya. But if you find a
fix, do share!
Hang in there Tronguy.
-- R; <><
O
As it happens, I'm dealing with this...have a small task to do some C, and
discovered the hard way that the 3279, while having the square brackets in
its normal character set, doesn't have them at the same code points as
later IBM OSes expect. tn3270 shows them fine, though.
On Tue, May 28, 2024 a
Hi Tom --
You're not wrong.
The musical code pages have led to multiplied complexities.
Living in the US, I've had it easier than some, and in most cases I can
(and do) treat "EBCDIC" as CP1047 (with an exception around not and
circumflex). CP37 came first, and was "close" but got the square
SVC 99 came in with TSO (R20.1?).
What is Restore?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <042bfe9c879d-dmarc-re
Batch TMP came in with TSO/E. SVC 99 was a supported interface in MVS, but the
parameter list was very different from that in OS/360 and SVS.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
Fr
24 matches
Mail list logo
