I kinda remember MVS/XA and later ESA being CBIPO and CBPDO for maint.
SYSGEN I think was still needed for XA and maybe ESA.
I'm not sure what you meant by Optional Source Materials. If by that you
meant optional source code to install, I think they went the microsloth
bloat ware option later.
A google search of the string below got me to an ibm manual that shows
this for a 216 -
216 The Pre-prompt EXIT returned a DEST userid that was not defined to
the subsystem.
Hope this helps...
On 8/24/2020 1:58 PM, Edgington, Jerry wrote:
I am having some troubles with logging on to TSO on
Our initial login is two factor to NCPASS, then to TPX. All of our
TN3270 connections use PAGENT.
On 6/30/2020 5:09 PM, Steve Beaver wrote:
Is anyone using CA-TPX, CL/SuperSession, Etc and enabled PAGENT?
--
For IBM-MAIN subs
of Unused space
Please also note that you can search a volume (or range of volumes)
for partial DSNAMEs, even when the partial DSNAME does not contain an
HLQ. (This may take a while and should be used with caution.)
VTOC runs in TSO interactively or batch.
Regards,
David
On 2020-06-18 09:4
dr map
Hi John,
I am well aware of this capability, and I really do not want to appear to be
overly chauvinistic, BUT, VTOC (File 112 on the CBT Tape) beats the pants off
of your solution.
Regards,
David
On 2020-06-18 09:36, John McKown wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:53 AM Brian France
On 2020-06-18 08:53, Brian France wrote:
I can't find a dfdss equivalent to fdr's map. I see the print
command but can't seem to get a whole volume list of data sets as we
do with fdr's map. If it exists would some
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
John McKown
Sent: 18 June 2020 15:36
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: dfdss equivalent to fdr map
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 7:53 AM Brian France wrote:
I can't find a dfdss equivalent to fdr's map. I see the print command
but
I can't find a dfdss equivalent to fdr's map. I see the print command
but can't seem to get a whole volume list of data sets as we do with
fdr's map. If it exists would someone please point me to it... THANX!!!
--
Brian W. France
Systems Administrator (Mainframe)
Pennsylvania State University
Sorry can't help ya. I have no ide'er... Maybe check broadcom's ( soon
to be bmc ) website's knowledge center.
On 3/3/2020 9:40 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 08:48:43 -0500, Brian France wrote:
We too are an ACF2 shop and I don't know of a way to do t
We too are an ACF2 shop and I don't know of a way to do this using ACF2
tho I have not really researched that since we've used IEFUV exit to
perform jcl validation while the job is being interpreted in my time
here and before.
On 3/2/2020 5:03 PM, Keith Costley wrote:
We are having an issue w
NEVER MIND They did something on their end to set ports and fix the
firewall to allow for them.
On 6/27/2019 2:08 PM, Brian France wrote:
Trying to establish a SSL FTP over port 990 with a winders servers.
Have done this in the past with no issues but now it seems with a
newer version of
Trying to establish a SSL FTP over port 990 with a winders servers. Have
done this in the past with no issues but now it seems with a newer
version of winders maybe combined with FW rules I can't obtain a data
channel. Connection over port 990, cert navigation, passing of userid
and password ev
A little over a year later I started here as an entry level sys prog.
Can't remember when I joined IBM-Main, thinking it was like 92 or so...
Thank you Darren...
On 6/6/19 8:01 PM, Edward Finnell wrote:
> Happy Birthday Ibm-main established 6 June 1986. Thanks Darren...
>
>
Anyone else out there getting numerous notifications, around 300 now,
from Broadcom regarding the release of CAIRIM 2.2? I've contacted them
but I really don't think the person on the other end understands that
something happened yesterday around 11am and hasn't stopped. Got bug
somewhere they do.
init's drained? lines drained? omvs shutdown?
On 5/14/19 5:32 PM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
> I am testing on a DR box, and I am seeing a shutdown problem with JES2.
>
> Here is the console log:
> $da
> $HASP612 NO ACTIVE JOBS
> $P JES2
> IEA964I HARDCOPY SUSPENDED, REASON=HCSW
> $da
> IEE707I $DA
We're an ACF2 shop and have not placed our certs there. They are only in
an omvs file that we use gskkyman to manage them.
On 3/12/2019 10:32 AM, Peter wrote:
Hi
Apology if it is a silly or it doesn't makes any sense.
Is it possible to extract certificate data from z/OS without going through
ning cause indeed it's not.
Thanx all
On 10/10/2018 9:07 AM, Brian France wrote:
On 10/10/2018 8:52 AM, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 08:36:52 -0400, Brian France wrote:
Yes we did. That was my thread as we both posted thinking the
other wasn't. According to ACF2
On 10/10/2018 8:52 AM, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 08:36:52 -0400, Brian France wrote:
Yes we did. That was my thread as we both posted thinking the
other wasn't. According to ACF2 doc and from what I see by dumping my
ACF2 logs calls are NOT being made to SERVER.NOPARM as
Howdy Tom,
Yes we did. That was my thread as we both posted thinking the
other wasn't. According to ACF2 doc and from what I see by dumping my
ACF2 logs calls are NOT being made to SERVER.NOPARM as ACF2 ignores them
by default. I even coded a SERVER.NOPARM rule to allow us access in case
resource to continue.
Panels that require the use of SDSFAUX are not available.
Hope that helps
Rob Scott
Rocket Software
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Brian France
Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 4:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS 2.3, SDS
We're in process of upgrading from z/OS 2.1 to 2.3 On our test lpar when
we enter sdsf we see the following message -
ISF452E SDSFAUX communications failed, return code 0x0008,,
reason code 0x00370801, function "connect". SDSFAUX not available,
or function not supported,
Indeed we have neve
On 08/02/2018 06:22 PM, Tom Conley wrote:
> On 8/2/2018 11:44 AM, Srivastava, Rajesh K wrote:
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww-01.ibm.com%2Fsupport%2Fdocview.wss%3Fuid%3Dswg24009131&data=02%7C01%7Cbwf2%40psu.edu%7C077d97a2c7ec45aab1d108d5f8c67187%7C7cf48d453ddb
How about from a WLM perspective or use RMF to view the times they run
as it might show the problems. RMF III you can watch it live.
I believe ADABAS has info in it's address space that shows file usage.
Now that might only show when the address space is shutdown.
On 8/2/2018 11:13 AM, Tony
On 05/17/2018 01:25 PM, Edward Gould wrote:
>> On May 17, 2018, at 11:21 AM, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>>
in IBM sort you have to specify equals this seemed to be the hardest
>> Edward,
>>
>> You can set EQUALS as default at the installation level for DFSORT. There
>> is a slight overhead with EQUA
Here we use CA-OPS to do this. There's rexx code that looks for certain
items, can exclude jobs if need be and creates an email that goes to our
circus now system.
On 6/29/2017 7:11 AM, Werner Kuehnel wrote:
Nathan,
I don't know ServiceNow, but we create automatically tickets for abending job
We moved from RMDS more years ago than I can remember. We use JSF from
Mackinney.
On 4/10/2017 5:27 AM, SrinivasG wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone using RMDS on Mainframe?
Since its being discontinued , I am interested in knowing what other shops are
doing.
Please share your solutions as far as RMDS is
Howdy Tim,
We run all that here. Not sure what you're looking for but I can
tell you how we use WLM here in conjunction with them. As you can
imagine there's all sorts of schools of thoughts that work. Take this as
it works here but not maybe not somewhere else.
Importance of 1, executi
We just installed this past Monday. No key issues sans working with SAG
to get rid of a message of one product that thinks it's on our D/R
machine but is running fine. See below the D M=CPU. I believe it to be
the same as it was.
D M=CPU
IEE174I 08.20.55 DISPLAY M 090
PROCESSOR STATUS
ID CPU
Uh, when you say sysplex are asking about many lpars over many different
physical frames or if not then take a look at RMF III, Overview, CPC.
This will show both capping's for all LPAR's on a given frame.
On 10/31/2016 12:36 PM, Peter wrote:
Hi
I am just looking some way to take a snapshot
On 10/12/2016 4:35 PM, Marna WALLE wrote:
Hello IBM-MAINers,
I wanted to ask about the usefulness of the IBM Education Assistance (IEA) for
z/OS.
A little background: IEA is found here:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks.nsf/pages/IBMIEAV22avail?Open and provides concise
and technical inf
ACFRPTPW - A report that can be run against the SMF data. This will show
many different reasons as to why a logon wasn't any good. ie - password
not matched, invalid syntax, password expired. There is a pre-processor
utility as generally ACF2 logs to a SMF record ( we're 230 ) and the
pre-proce
Check your list of ciphers. There are ciphers specific to tls 1.2.
On 3/24/2016 11:37 AM, Lopez, Sharon wrote:
A federal agency changed to TLS v1.2 over the weekend and now we are not able
to connect to them via CICS 5.2. We have on the TLS V1.2 ptf for z/OS 1.13 and
we are starting with the
Visara
On 1/6/2016 11:18 AM, Lopez, Sharon wrote:
What console controllers does everyone use to share consoles across multiple
data centers? Are most people using OSA, Visara controllers, etc?
Thank you.
Sharon Lopez
Email correspondence to and from this ad
Here's a link with some info. It's not an announcement letter but
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/ds8000/
On 10/15/2015 10:46 AM, Staller, Allan wrote:
Newest I can find in the IBM Offerings is DS8870.
HTH,
Any one has url for IBM announcement letter of DS8880? I can´t find it
Yes and the same results
On 10/1/2015 8:48 AM, Chris Hoelscher wrote:
I experienced the same symptoms as did you!
Chris hoelscher
Technology Architect
Database Infrastructure Services
Technology Solution Services
123 East Main Street
Louisville, KY 40202
choelsc...@humana.com
Humana.com
(5
CROSS POSTED - IBM-MAIN, IBMTCP...
We're at z/OS 2.1 trying to move to TLSV1.1 and or TLSV1.2 for our
TN3270E connections. Currently we are
SSLV3 and TLSV1. On our TEST systems I have TLSV1 in my PAGENT rules as
well as TLSV1.1 and TLSV1.2 with
sslv2/sslv3 off. Our client does not have a TLS op
I have cross posted this to both IBM-MAIN and IBMTCP-L.
Since we upgraded to z/OS 2.1 we've been receiving ( sporadically and by
that I mean out of 55 batch jobs a day we'll have 3-4 failures where
that would be a weeks total for failures prior to the upgrade) the
following error -
EZB1051E
For z/OS 1.13 there's a PTF. Sorry off hand I do not know it.
On 11/21/2014 3:43 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
I call gsk_attribute_set_enum(env_handle, GSK_PROTOCOL_TLSV1_2,
GSK_PROTOCOL_TLSV1_2_ON) and get RC 701 "Attribute identifier is not valid."
The same code works on V2R1 so either the answer
Way back machine started.
Once upon a time we ran RMDS with ACF2. ACF2 versions woulda been like 6
and 8. I have no idea anymore what RMDS version we had.
There were exits in RMDS that we utilized with ACF2. They would take the
report name ( the one you see when you're in RMDS, not the data s
I see you have pasv_enable=yes
I think there's a setting in z/OS parms maybe related. EPSV4 True
On 5/7/2014 3:36 PM, Mark Pace wrote:
I had looked at that also. The vsftpd config - comments removed for
brevity.
listen=YES
max_clients=20
use_localtime=YES
log_ftp_protocol=YES
# enable FTPS
ss
I saw this same message before. We had a guy here that ran a tcp trace
during the connection process, moved it to a linux workstation and used
TCPDUMP? on it. What he determined was the windows server we were trying
to connect to had a checkpoint firewall and it actually was re-writting
the fir
We did this so long ago I disremember a lot of it. BUT I can state that
there are no MIH values coded in our IOS member. Just Hyperpav...
Oh and we are a basic sysplex shop
On 2/20/2014 10:08 AM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
There should be something documented in the manuals for your DS8870 to
Howdy Marna,
I like it so far. I thru the chapter 1 and 2, starting 3. Did not
even print out chapter 4. Saved some trees that way.
And yes, sorry, I still need to print, highlite and note take
with pen and highlighter.
On 8/8/2013 5:51 PM, Marna WALLE wrote:
Hi All,
Since you m
I believe there is an additional charge.
On 6/7/2013 8:23 AM, Bob Shannon wrote:
Is this an additional charge feature or just a startup option?
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access i
We are looking at it. We pulled together a month of SMF data for them to
analyze to assess is we're a good candidate or not. Now awaiting those
results. In our initial meetings SAG believed we may indeed be a good
candidate due to our heavy batch environment.
On 6/6/2013 7:30 PM, Longnecker, D
gil,
SS13CEEM I believe is a Syncsort module, not a DFSORT module which is
why DFSORT works. Syncsort uses that naming convention for their
modules. In your case it would be Syncsort 1.3 or 3.1 as I think they
have some reverse thing going.
On 2/25/2013 6:46 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
SYNC
Migrated back in October, z/OS 1.11 to 1.13. Saw nothing of the like.
For some reason I kinda remember another email on this subject sometime
in the last 6 months or so. Please don't hold me this to this but an
exit may have needed reassembled and I wanna say it was iefactrt that
was not workin
My manager got the same call the day before xmas from our rep ( at IBM's
insistance ). I too was not ( still am not ) registered for this site.
BUT I am registered for red alerts. IF this was that serious should that
not be the vehicle to get this info out. I do not want to register
somewhere e
7;ll
understand. - Chinese Proverb
On Oct 16, 2012, at 1:26 PM, Brian France wrote:
Howdy Barb,
See imbedded below...
On 10/16/2012 12:59 PM, ibmmain wrote:
Brian,
Well we had such a pleasant phone call on Friday with IBM reps on this
subject. Much to our DISMAY, they maintain
Howdy Barb,
See imbedded below...
On 10/16/2012 12:59 PM, ibmmain wrote:
Brian,
Well we had such a pleasant phone call on Friday with IBM reps on this
subject. Much to our DISMAY, they maintain that this access was never
free and that promoting web sites costs money.
I think what you
Well we had such a pleasant phone call on Friday with IBM reps on this
subject. Much to our DISMAY, they maintain that this access was never
free and that promoting web sites costs money. And people at phones
don't? IBMLINK I'm told has been this way since either 98 or 99. I
state, I never ente
Well I continue to push. I'm asking for documentation as to when this
change went into effect. Clarification on the dollar$ cause, WOW!!
Still am being told we never should've been able to do what we've been
doing. I state back there's a hell of a lot of others in the world doing
this and you
All,
I'm surmising that y'all, like us, have multiple user id's for
support at www.ibm.com/support. We have several people here that have
opened PMR's over the past many many years. A couple of weeks back I
went in to open an issue and found that I was no longer entitled to
z/OS. What I f
53 matches
Mail list logo