You need to tell us what software is experiencing the 0C4 abends.
You also should start your own discussion, with a new subject, for this since
it is not at all related to the discussion you chose to reply to.
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LIST
Is your input file RECFM fixed or variable? If fixed, how do you determine how
much of the record is valid? Is there some reason DFSORT must be used to do
this (as opposed to REXX or some Unix command)?
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.
If both directories can be reached from an lpar, then why not use the cp
command with a suitable wild card in the source path. Or you could tar the
source directory and pipe the output to an "untar" command that specifies the
desired destination.
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainfram
Hand carry the Journal dataset (ADRDSSU dump?) to the DR site and apply it to
the CDSes after everything else is restored.
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>Behalf Of Michael Bieganski
>Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 1:15 PM
>To
NON-SMS in your dump
>class and see if that works?
>
>Are you manually running the process or is DFHSM running it on a
>schedule?
>
>Thanks
>
>Lizette
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>
So the manual is just flat out wrong?
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>Behalf Of Staller, Allan
>Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 5:52 AM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: Stacking SMS and non-SMS disk on same HSM dump
DU
>Subject: Re: Stacking SMS and non-SMS disk on same HSM dump tape
>
>EXT-Schwarz, Barry wrote:
>
>>On z/OS 1.11, the HSM manual says a stacked dump tape can contain dumps
>from both SMS and non-SMS packs. However, with STACK(99), every test
>case I have run results in
Among other things, it wastes a lot of space on a 3592 and doubles the number
of tapes and tape mounts required for each cycle of the dump class.
>-Original Message-
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
>Sent: Tuesday, October 08
On z/OS 1.11, the HSM manual says a stacked dump tape can contain dumps from
both SMS and non-SMS packs. However, with STACK(99), every test case I have
run results in SMS packs first going to one 3592 tape (genned as 3590-1) and
then non-SMS packs going to a second tape. I have tried with 1,
At least two options to do what you want:
3.15 brings up panel ISRSFPRI. If you blank out the DS Name and Member
List fields, it will bring up panel ISRSFCON which allows you to specify up to
four datasets to search.
If you use 3.4 to bring up a dataset list containing the datasets o
Our practice is to keep everything until the SUPing PTF is accepted. Then both
PTFs are automatically rejected.
But if your concern is the space consumed, copy the SUPed PTF to tape (just in
case) and then reject it out of the PTS. Once you accept the applied PTF, you
can reject it and scratc
Show some code. Describe the problems in reasonable detail.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Scott Ford
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 3:21 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: C question
>
> All:
>
> I nee
The DEST field makes sense (the value matches). I will have to check but I
don't think IDTF is active on our system unless it defaults so. Nor have we
ever knowingly done anything to authorize a user access to netmail. But now I
have somewhere to start looking. Thank you.
> -Original Me
We have a sequence of JES2 commands that run at 1600 every day to purge output
more the 7 days old. For reasons almost lost in antiquity, the sequence
avoided purging jobs/tasks that begin with S. When I first noticed several
hundred jobs in the output queue (SDSF command O), I started looking
What is NDM? What product (apparently not RACF) issued the RACF002I message?
Does RACF still show the user as protected?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Biller, Charles A (CHUCK)
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 1
The immediate cause of the bad return codes is that neither EDIT nor MACRO are
ISREDIT commands
As others have noted, your macro (REXX or CLIST) must be in a separate member
from where you issue the EDIT command with the MACRO operand.
However, allocating SYSEXEC the way you did is also a bad i
It is a two step process:
The first is configuring the volumes on the DS6000. Are you installing a
new DS6000 and moving data from existing DASD to the new box or are you trying
to combine existing -9 volumes (and possibly unused capacity) into a single -27
volume?
The second is movin
While exceeding 4 GB may be the usual reason for needing EA, it also provides
some other functionality, such as partial release of space. But if you don't
know why the other datasets are EA then it is hard to determine whether these
need to be changed or not.
> -Original Message-
> Fro
Once a dataset is created, the dataclass no longer controls its attributes.
The issue is not that the datasets have the wrong dataclass. The issue is they
don't have extended addressability.
The datasets did not spring into existence by themselves. They were defined
and allocated at some poi
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Bonno, Tuco
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 6:57 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: 2 smp/e questions.
>
> environment here is z/os 1.13
>
> (1) In the smp/e “cross-zone
John
Did you really write this or has your account been hacked? You normally don't
make gross English grammar errors or engage in for self criticism.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of John Gilmore
> Sent: Tuesday,
In my z/OS 1.11 copy on line 999 there is a comment that states they are not
supported by APPC/MVS.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Etienne Thijsse
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 6:09 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA
My mistake about after. How about during? On the TSO logon panel, if you
enter the correct passphrase, do you also need to enter the current password
when you enter a new password? I would test it but we don't have phrases
active.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Joel C. Ewing
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 9:08 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: DFHSM QUESTION - RECALLING DSN TO ITS ORIGINAL VOLUME
>
> Noticing that this thread
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 7:19 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Long Passwords
Snip
> True, you can use either password or password phras
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Toole, Michael
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 12:16 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Long Passwords
>
> So you're only using them for TSO? I thought you would have to
I recommend building an IOCP input dataset from of the IODFs and then compare
(e.g., using SUPERC) to identify the differences and possibly build the delta
statements to combine them.
In my 1.11 version of Hardware Configuration Definition User's Guide, chapter 9
describes building the IOCP inp
Hire someone who knows what he is doing.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Miklos Szigetvari
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 3:31 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: DS6800 3390 quesation
>
> Hi
>
>
Not in our experience. We have a minimal DS6800 and have configured it with
3390-1, -2, -3, -9, and -12 volumes. It came with four FICON CHPIDs and two
controllers and every path has access to everything.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTS
To simplify things I have deleted the lines which contain only the tail end of
comments. I have also inserted some line numbers to correspond to my comments.
Line 1 tells us that JCTJCLAS contains the address of the class. You use that
address correctly in the target of the EX instruction in l
Obviously memory didn't serve. The TMBLKSI field in the CA-1 TMC is indeed 4
bytes. But the manual says the data comes from the JFCBLKSI field in the JFCB
and that field is only 2 bytes. I wonder where CA-1 picks up the extra data
from.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Disc
What is the real issue you are trying to resolve? Unless the GDG has been
inactive, the status of the migrated datasets shouldn't matter. If one of the
datasets is recalled from ML2, it would not be part of the GDG (it is
catalogued separately) because there would be current datasets belonging
3.1 does have a delete all members command. On the command line, enter
S * D
When it finishes, compress the dataset because the high water mark is not reset.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Charles Mills
> Sen
33 matches
Mail list logo
