Re: D U,,ALLOC GIVES MSGIEE106I *UNKNOWN (UNKNOWN) MVS DISPLAY ALLOCATED UNITS COMMAND

Yes it will online. On Tuesday, January 29, 2019, 10:15:04 PM GMT+3:30, Rob Schramm wrote: What happens if you box a device offline? Can you bring it back online? Rob Schramm On Tue, Jan 29, 2019, 2:19 AM Mehrshad Manshadi < 0056e0e17177-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wr

Re: D U,,ALLOC GIVES MSGIEE106I *UNKNOWN (UNKNOWN) MVS DISPLAY ALLOCATED UNITS COMMAND

but the problem still there. On Wednesday, January 30, 2019, 1:46:27 PM GMT+3:30, Mehrshad Manshadi wrote: Yes it will online. On Tuesday, January 29, 2019, 10:15:04 PM GMT+3:30, Rob Schramm wrote: What happens if you box a device offline? Can you bring it back online

Z/os Work load Management (WLM)

There was a sample WLM(z/os work load management ) setting in the internet which i downloaded long time ago.  Anybody have that internet address? Thanks   -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send

D U,,ALLOC GIVES MSGIEE106I *UNKNOWN (UNKNOWN) MVS DISPLAY ALLOCATED UNITS COMMAND

In response to a D U,,ALLOC command, msgIEE106I is issued indicating a jobname of *UNKNOWN for certain DASD units. It is also not possible to Vary the unit(s) offline (unable to vary). This problem was traced to an OEM product changing the UCB in a job's TIOT without incrementing the new

Re: CICS IR I/O wait time (inter-region (MRO) I/O wait)

Mehrshad Manshadi < 0056e0e17177-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Hi, > The IRIOWTT(Interregion I/O wait time) time is very high(14 min). > Would you please help me to know the cause and which parameter i should > control to

CICS IR I/O wait time (inter-region (MRO) I/O wait)

Hi, The IRIOWTT(Interregion I/O wait time) time is very high(14 min). Would you please help me to know the cause and which parameter i should control to prevent this issue?  -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Apply PTF on DB2 10 (z/os 1.12)

Hi, I am trying to apply UI15763 PTF on DB2 10 ( z/OS 1.12 ). The following error is appeared : GIM23901E ** LINK-EDIT PROCESSING FOR SYSMOD UI12617 FAILED FOR MODULE DSNHAPLY IN LMOD DSNHPC IN THE SDSNLOAD LIBRARY. THE RETURN CODE (04) EXCEEDED THE ALLOWABLE VALUE. DATE 16.054 - TIME 14:53:18 -

Re: Compile COBOL Programs In 64 Bit.

Dear Steve As I understand from your explanations, compiling COBOL in 64 bit mode is not useful. But the question is that this much of addressable of memory (64 Bit ) is for what ?Because as I know most the applications in mainframe are developed by COBOL and C.(Mostly COBOL)Best

Compile COBOL Programs In 64 Bit.

Hi,I am looking for COBOL compiler option to compile our COBOL programs in 64 Bit mode.Please lead me if you have such a experience .The COBOL version is 4.2 on Z9 with z/OS 1.12.Best regardsManshadi -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe

SDM ANTAS001 Problem.

Hi,After completion concurrent copy in the XRC session while all the volumes are in DUP status we encountered the following messages and the ANTAS001 will dropped. ANTQ5006E XQUERY FAILED FOR SESSION(DS1), RC=4026 REAS=0  IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X80A MATCHED.  JOBNAME=ANTAS001,

MISSING CHANNEL AND DEVICE END

Hi, I encountered the following message on the production system as follows : IEF196I IOS071I 1000,4D,*MASTER*, MISSING CHANNEL AND DEVICE END  IOS071I 1000,4D,*MASTER*, MISSING CHANNEL AND DEVICE END 873  IEF196I IOS079I 1000,11,XCFAS, I/O TIMEOUT INTERVAL HAS BEEN

Re: MISSING CHANNEL AND DEVICE END

. Thanks On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 3:34 PM, Mike Schwab mike.a.sch...@gmail.com wrote: Set MASDEF to 100.  Or change your I/O gen so only 1 system uses JES2 Checkpoint Volumes with MASDEF=. On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I

XRC Problem HDS (9980)

Hello all,  does anyone have a rule of thumb as to how much Replication for disaster recovery slows down overall disk I/O? We are replicating about 45 terabytes from HDS USP using asynch. We recently had issues that slowed our mainframe to a crawl. The work around was to stop replication.

XRC Consistency Group Time Report.

Hi, We have an XRC session with 590 volume 3390 model 9, which is established on disaster recovery site on 450 k far from our local site. The connection is STM1 150 mbs between local and disaster recovery site. we are using Cisco MDS 9222i as a switch between ESS on local site and SDM on

Re: XRC Consistency Group Time Report.

26, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, We have an XRC session with 590 volume 3390 model 9, which is established on disaster recovery site on 450 k far from our local site. The connection is STM1 150 mbs between local and disaster recovery site. we are using

Re: XRC Consistency Group Time Report.

Hi, Thanks. Whenever we are using XRC the mirror is Asynchronous. am I right? Is there possible establish synchronous pair with XRC? any parameter?  Regards Manshadi From: Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Tuesday

Re: XRC Consistency Group Time Report.

Thank you very much for your usefull information. We have HDS with 32 Gig cash .with 590 volume 3390 model 9 . The connection between disk and cpu in the local site is 3 ficon channel. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: Reorganizing Partition Table Space With REBALANCE Option Problem.

://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort/ IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 10/08/2012 10:10:10 AM: From: Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu, Date: 10/08/2012 10:11 AM Subject: Re: Reorganizing Partition Table Space With REBALANCE Option Problem. Sent

Reorganizing Partition Table Space With REBALANCE Option Problem.

Hi, We have a table space with 250 partition and 4,600,000,000 records which it's have to re partition. Because of lack space on the DASD we are trying to use Tape on some DD cards as follows : //SYSREC    DD DSN=TEMPDS.TAPE1,DISP=(MOD,CATLG),              //          

Re: Reorganizing Partition Table Space With REBALANCE Option Problem.

/MVSontheweb at http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort/ IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote on 10/08/2012 08:03:35 AM: From: Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu, Date: 10/08/2012 08:06 AM Subject: Reorganizing Partition Table Space With REBALANCE

Re: IPL Probelm.

is development. The development LPAR is not weighted as high as the production one. It also pauses for a short time at this point, whereas the production one does not. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mehrshad

Re: IPL Probelm.

don't have any HW message nor any system messages on whatever console While your system is hung what's its status on HMC console??? Has your system some parallel channel ?? Hi. Paolo Cacciari IBM BCRS Senior IT Specialist - Certified From:  Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com

Re: IPL Probelm.

determination mode to see any post-NIP messages V CN(*),ACTIVATE Ant. Northern Territory Government Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com wrote in message news:1346908204.56278.yahoomail...@web125601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com... Hi, During IPL the system the last message which appear

Re: IPL Probelm.

will hanged. Best regards Manshadi       From: Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 12:36 PM Subject: Re: IPL Probelm. We disconnected all 2074 consoles from the machine and IPLed it from HMC but the same

Re: IPL Probelm.

these messages. Did you check for a waitstate? Kees. Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com wrote in message news:1346908204.56278.yahoomail...@web125601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com... Hi, During IPL the system the last message which appear on the console is as follows  and after that the machine

Re: IPL Probelm.

.!!!???   From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 12:57 PM Subject: Re: IPL Probelm. Did you check if the machine entered a Waitstate? Kees. Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com wrote in message news

Re: IPL Probelm.

said, the problem occurs after these messages. = Did you check for a waitstate? = = Kees. = = Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com wrote in message = news:1346908204.56278.yahoomail...@web125601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com... = Hi, = = During IPL the system the last message which appear on the console

Re: IPL Probelm.

There is an wait state on the system I will investigate that.  From: Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 1:06 PM Subject: Re: IPL Probelm. Ok thanks for your explanation

Re: IPL Probelm.

Of Vernooij, CP - SPLXM Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 1:48 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IPL Probelm. Not so much a hardware, but more an IOCDS or configuration problem. If you don't know what a waitstate is, ask you operators, they should know. Kees. Mehrshad Manshadi

IPL Probelm.

Hi, During IPL the system the last message which appear on the console is as follows  and after that the machine is not available any more. I tried to IPL from HMC but the problem is exactly same. CUN2046I AN EMPTY UNICODE ENVIRONMENT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED CUN2005I CONVERSION ENVIRONMENT

Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.

Hi all, We have a parallel Sysplex with 2 members.one of them is a CPU Z900 (2064 -1C5) with Z/OS 1.8 as operating system and the other is CPU Z900(2064-216) with the same operating system.  We have a weird problem with CPU 2064-216 as follows: When we power on reset the CPU and IPL from that,It

Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.

? What happens to that LPAR's response times? Kees. Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com wrote in message news:1345106626.32723.yahoomail...@web125603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com... Hi all, We have a parallel Sysplex with 2 members.one of them is a CPU Z900 (2064 -1C5) with Z/OS 1.8 as operating

Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.

, 2012 2:50 PM Subject: Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem. Mehrshad Manshadi wrote: We have a parallel Sysplex with 2 members.one of them is a CPU Z900 (2064 -1C5) with Z/OS 1.8 as operating system and the other is CPU Z900(2064-216) with the same operating system. z/OS 1.8 is unsupported. When

Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.

: Thursday, August 16, 2012 3:23 PM Subject: Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem. Mehrshad Manshadi wrote: No this happen for all the jobs.Like ( Reorg , load ) Re-org is sometimes heavy on resources, but managable. YMMV. We are using the simple dump just for test. Please describe your 'simple

Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.

compression, can this be switched off after 12 hours? Kees. Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com wrote in message news:1345115098.18256.yahoomail...@web125603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com... We have this degradation for all the jobs after 12 hours of POR and IPL. We are using Goal Mode. We are also

Re: Z900 (2064 - 216) Problem.

. Mehrshad Manshadi m_mansh...@yahoo.com wrote in message news:1345115098.18256.yahoomail...@web125603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com... We have this degradation for all the jobs after 12 hours of POR and IPL. We are using Goal Mode. We are also change the volumes on other channels but the problem is same