okay...Let me try that and see how it goes
Regards,
Robert
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Thanks for your inputs . We are doing this on a test system at this time and I
couldnt find any date /time conversion subroutines over there
Could you please provide me a sample of SUDATE , SUTIME and SUYYDDDF which I
can use for this purpose ?
Regards,
Robert
Greetings ,
I downloaded SORTTRAK from CBT tape and compiled it on my 2.4 system to pull
out DFSORT usage stats . However , it failed with OC1 reason code 1
IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 670
SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=0C1 REASON CODE=0001
TIME=09.35.45 SE
ll of them ahead according to the value
specified in DYNALOC ICEOPTS . Any suggestions on how to fine tune DFSORT
dynamic SORTWK allocations ?
Regards,
Robert Hahne
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruct
Greetings ,
Is there a way a user can be allowed to execute a unix shell script in batch
without changing the file permission bits or granting SUPERUSER authority ?
Currently the file has got 700 and the user is not the owner of the file . Any
suggestions would be great
Regards,
Robert Hahne
Well, it is more or less similar.
The main advantage over "legacy" links is CHPID virtualization, that
means you may have several CHPIDs assigned to one physical link.
What is your problem? Do you have the fanout card installed? Is it cable
plugged?
How many sysplexes do you wan to connect?
Th
Greetings ,
Can someone direct me to a documentation for implementing ICA links on Z13 ? .
I was able to find a fantastic manual for implementing InfiniBand on system Z ,
but nothing similar to that for ICA . Are they similar in coding from an HCD
standpoint ?
Regards,
Robert
--
Thank you all . It looks like security policies will have to be revisited .
I'll go back to the management and see if they are okay to get rid off this
requirement . As others have pointed out , JESJOBS and OPERCMDS would be the
way to go if they insist on keeping these rules .
I am also gonna
Hi Lizette,
But , the JOBCLASS profiles looks to be protecting only the class parameter
within the JCL . We are looking for something that enforce the jobname to start
with their userid
Regards,
Robert
--
For IBM-MAIN subscr
? Do you have z/OSEM?
Any tools?
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Robert Hahne
Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2020 1:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: TSO/E SUBMIT exit
Hello listers ,
I understand this is a RACF question . But thought
Hi Lizette ,
Yes . We run JES2 and SDSF both
Regards,
Robert
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I agree ..It is a pretty old system and these exits have been out there for
very long and we might get rid off that restriction some time soon .
But , I wanted to eliminate this exit first and was wondering if RACF can do
that .
--
Hello listers ,
I understand this is a RACF question . But thought someone can help me here .
We have a requirement where TSO submit exit IKJEFF10 needs to be eliminated .
Currently it is written to ensure only those users with TSOAUTH(OPER) are
allowed to submit jobs with any name . Rest of t
Thank you Peter for the clarification . We will be moving to distributed mode
hopefully by end of this month .
Bob Hahne
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
Yes . But i was wondering if there is any restriction that IEARELCN needs to
run on the same LPAR where the console is originally defined .
In other words , how to remove a console definition that shows in the D C,N
output as *NONE ?
Bob Hahne
---
Greetings ,
We were supposed to remove a few inactive MCS definitions from our sysplex .
The LPAR where it originally had its definition is IPL'ed after removing the
entries from CONSOLxx . But forgot to run IEARELCN to remove it from the plex .
Now when i do a display D C,N on all LPARS, it s
(UCW) representing the device at POR time. It
indicates the relative position of the UCW in the UCW table. The subchannel
number was designed to speed up the search of a UCW during SSCH processing.
Robert Hahne
--
For IBM-M
based on skill .
Interviews should happen at manager level so the practice of illiterate guys
managing technical teams would stop . But then , how many companies are
willing to do this ?
Robert Hahne
> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 15:22:37 -0500
> From: idfzos...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re
. Because each processor's prefix register contains a
different address, each
processor can address locations 0 to 4095 and reference its
own data.
In Z/architecture , it used to fix the first 2 pages unlike MVS/XA and the
concept did not change AFAIK ...
Robert Hahne
> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 20
CSV540E simply means that dynamic activation with COPYFROM=CURRENT is no longer
going to work . Peter has already explained why this happens and what needs to
be done . Why is OP still beating around the bush ?
> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 17:44:43 -0500
> From: deerh...@ix.netcom.com
> Subject: R
Mark ,
Since you are looking at deleting orphaned logstream datasets , neither TSO
delete or deleting the logstream is going to work
Ane excerpt from MVS setting up a sysplex - Finding and deleting orphaned log
data sets says ,
The orphaned data sets should be deleted using the IDCAMS delete
> Perhaps you should repost your request next month / next monday because it
> seemed to me all gurus are on one or another holiday yesterday and today...
Thank you Elardus for making that point . I will surely re-post it next week
and even i felt that IBM Main was silent for past 2 days :)
-
Right . Thats what i thought too . But just wanted to make sure if there are
any better methods for reporting MSU consumption
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.e
Hi Listers ,
I have a question on RMF Overview reports . We have 6 LPARS on ZEC12 mainframe
running z/os 1.13 . These six LPARS form a part of 3 different sysplexes . We
are trying to extract daily MSU utilization for each LPAR using RMF Overview
reports
DATE(14330,14330)
ETOD(,2400)
STOD
OAM PISA Guide for Objects do have RACF profiles info , but thats not the case
with OAM PISA guide for tape libraries .
IBM should have updated it for tape library documentation as well .
>
> Correct . But they don't have any reference to the security profiles needed
> for OAM started task
Are you asking how to restore a purged output from Archival tools like CA View
or $AVRS ?
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:31:11 +0530
> From: dbajava...@gmail.com
> Subject: To restore Purged STC output
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Hello Group,
>
> Is there a possibility of recovering a pa
Greetings ,
Thank you everyone for your valuable suggestions . We are still discussing with
our customer on the possibilities of getting a consultant for this migration .
Thanks a lot !
---
Hello Chris ,
This is a very good explanation . But that still leaves OP's last question
"If IDCAMS requires APF authorization for called modules, why does IDCAMS work
when the JOBLIB is supposedly not authorized by introducing a non-authorized
library to the JOBLIB? "
I assume OP ran the jo
Hello all ,
We are planning on a Top secret conversion project where CA top secret needs to
be replaced with RACF . We are on Z/os 1.11 .Can someone direct me towards some
good documentation or manuals to start with ?
Best Regards,
Bob
--
>
> Greetings ,
>
>Recently , we had a problem during the REORG of SAR index file . It was
> observed that the index file utilization increases abnormally while the REORG
> job runs and comes down once the job completes. In the mean while , if the
> utilization crosses 100 % , the job fai
> If India was very poor in terms of economy, There are many others poorer
> than we think, why dont IBM think of it then? B-)
IBM is not doing business to raise the economy of poor countries .
But they should also know that , they get only what they pay for . You make
more profit by paying less
>
> >I guess , Mark is asking whether the SYSNAME is defined in SCDS .
I believe ,there should be a SYSNAME already defined . If not , you would have
seen a message as given below
IGD081I COMMDS dsname DOES NOT HAVE SYSTEM sysname OR SYSPLEX sysplex
DEFINED
<<<>>>
Its NOT Correct !
First of all , alias has nothing to do here .Irrespective of whether dataset
has an alias or not , as long as the original dataset is out there in APF list
it gets authorized . You specify either VOLUME=XX or SMS and it works
either way !
For the OP , the an
Hello Mark ,
Sure . I am gonna try that . Thank you very much for your suggestions !
Regards,
Bob
>
> Even though TCP/IP is fully initialized at EZB6473I according to the FM (which
> comes out right before EZAIN11I), for 2 seconds I probably wouldn't spend
> my time looking into this even on a
Hello Mark ,
That's exactly what's happening in my system . I checked the logs for several
IPL's in the past and it looks like GPMSERVE is always started in that 2 second
window (even my system shows a delay of 2 seconds between EZAIN11I and
EZD1176I) . After EZD1176I , GPMSERVE starts w/o an
Hello Mark ,
Thanks for the response !
Sorry , i was wrong . OMVS was fully functional , but EZD1176I message hadn't
come out while GPMSERVE was abending.
EZD1176I TCPIP HAS SUCCESSFULLY JOINED THE TCP/IP SYSPLEX GROUP EZBTCPCS
Everytime ,after this message comes out , GPMSERVE seems to be
Hi ,
We have a problem in our Z/os 1.11 system where GPMSERVE started task
continuosly abends after IPL with the below message and then starts fine later
on when start command is issued manually . The message is given below . TCPIP
is already initialized before this happens . Any thoughts ?
think so . During our DB2 v10 upgrade, we had to increase maxspace
> to 16000 M ,then we added only the local page datasets .
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Robert Hahne
> wrote:
>
> > Greetings ,
> >
> > We have a requirement in our shop to change
Greetings ,
We have a requirement in our shop to change the MAXSPACE value from 2000M to
8000M . IBM says there should be a 1:3 ratio between maxspace and auxiliary
storage . that means , my total auxiliary storage needs to be increased by 3
times which is 24000 M (to satisfy 1:3 ratio) . I
Hello ,
I just did a TSO ISRDDN and tried to locate SRCHFOR member , even for me it
says member not found . But in my system , srchfor works as normal . So , i
guess the invocation happens in a different way . BTW , which release of z/os
are you using ?
Regards,
Bob
> Date: Fri, 12 Jul
Yes . When you activate a new LNKLST , LLA gets refreshed automatically .
https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=8&cad=rja&ved=0CF8QFjAH&url=http%3A%2F%2Fschunk-it.com%2FPresentations%2FShare095%2Fs2855ssa.pdf&ei=ntXdUcDvK8r5rAenkoHwBw&usg=AFQjCNGmcl7LdMqRb9Y5_671PSn2_9IE4w
There is a share presentation out there for PDSE best practices
https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&cad=rja&ved=0CD8QFjAE&url=https%3A%2F%2Fshare.confex.com%2Fshare%2F120%2Fwebprogram%2FHandout%2FSession12981%2FSHARE%2520PDSE%2520Best%2520Practices.pdf&ei=YtzVUc2_N4j
42 matches
Mail list logo