>Mike Schwab wrote:
>
>>I am thinking they are missing the old run time libraries.
>
>It is a good possibility. BTGTT, of course, my programmers are not really
>happy with that possibility. :-)
All COBOL library routines are included in LE, so that is NOT a possibility.
What I do see in client sho
Mike Schwab wrote:
>I am thinking they are missing the old run time libraries.
It is a good possibility. BTGTT, of course, my programmers are not really happy
with that possibility. :-)
They always blames everything except themselves... :-D :-D
I wonder what is the OP's comment on that missin
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht
wrote:
> John Norgauer wrote:
>
>>We are experiencing Cobol program abending on z/OS 1.11.
>
>>Programs are compiled and linked with 20 year old Cobol subroutines. When we
>>were running on z/OS 1.9, there were no problems compiling and re-link
In
,
on 08/29/2012
at 01:51 PM, John Norgauer said:
>Programs are compiled and linked with 20 year old Cobol
What is the COBOL name and product number?
>U4052 abend.
What does the appropriate COBOL messages and codes documentation say
about U4052? What are the accompanying messages and wha
John Norgauer wrote:
>We are experiencing Cobol program abending on z/OS 1.11.
>Programs are compiled and linked with 20 year old Cobol subroutines. When we
>were running on z/OS 1.9, there were no problems compiling and re-linking.
>Programs executed successfully.
>Now on our z/OS 1.11 system
We are experiencing Cobol program abending on z/OS 1.11.
Here's the scenario.
Programs are compiled and linked with 20 year old Cobol subroutines.
When we were running on z/OS 1.9, there were no problems compiling and
re-linking. Programs executed successfully.
Now on our z/OS 1.11 system, when
