I don't know the situation with the OP, but AC / Accenture / Foundation's
Install/1 and Design/1 tools were primarily used for new development in the
late 80s and early 90s. For the time, the tooling really wasn't that bad and
was useful in terms of application development productivity. It wou
PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Decouple Accenture's Install-1 from CICS
On Aug 8, 2012, at 1:56 PM, George, William@FTB wrote:
-
>>-Original Message-
>>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Ed Gould
>>Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 1:31 PM
>>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>>Subject: Re: Decouple Accenture's Install-1 from CICS
>On Au
On Aug 8, 2012, at 1:56 PM, George, William@FTB wrote:
-
SNIP
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@li
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Scott Chapman
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 3:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Decouple Accenture's Install-1 from CICS
You can do just about anything with enough
You can do just about anything with enough time, money, and code. I'm usually
lacking in one or more of those resources.
However, having some experience with Install/1, if you have a non-trivial
application written using the online architecture, replacing certainly would a
signficant effort,
(cross posted: CICS-L & IBM-MAIN)
We are in the initial stages of analysis on decoupling Accenture's (originally
Anderson Consulting's) Design/1 and Install/1 from our extremely large
compilation of CICS applications and are looking for any experienced insights
on doing such. Our initial questi
