The problem I had with it was that there doesn't seem to be any way to
order maintenance for an FMID (or product) until *after* it has been
applied. I would have much preferred to have applied all maintenance
along with the FMID, particularly since there were ++IFREQs against the
FMID that wanted
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 00:04:50 -0500, Tim Henness wrote:
>The problem I had with it was that there doesn't seem to be any way to
>order maintenance for an FMID (or product) until *after* it has been
>applied. I would have much preferred to have applied all maintenance
>along with the FMID, particula
The problem I had with it was that there doesn't seem to be any way to
order maintenance for an FMID (or product) until *after* it has been
applied. I would have much preferred to have applied all maintenance
along with the FMID, particularly since there were ++IFREQs against the
FMID that wan
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:49:37 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
>
>We didn't have the DASD space at the time (we needed a few extra
>volumes for maintenance and they were being used by another
>application). We were in a DASD constrained environment.
>
Is there a further performance concern in that if the user
Kurt:
We didn't have the DASD space at the time (we needed a few extra
volumes for maintenance and they were being used by another
application). We were in a DASD constrained environment.
Ed
On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:49 AM, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
I was working on a specific product and *ONLY
On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
Kurt:
We wanted to bring RACF to the latest level without the other
"acruttumonts(sp?)" so w just wanted to receive maintenance for RACF.
We had an issue and level 2 want ptf X on and x was in the the group
of PTFS that we wanted to ord
I was working on a specific product and *ONLY* wanted maintenance for that.
Time and again I had to figure out all the pertaining PTF's and do a
select(,,,,eee, etc etc) I did NOT want maintenance
for other products to be recieved and applied.
(I know I'm going to kick my sel
I installed a feature pack for CICS. It came as a separate FMID. We
are having trouble making it work, so I wanted to make sure that we
had the latest maintenance for it.
That tells me why you want to install (APPLY) PTFs for a single FMID.
It does not answer my question of why you feel it nece
Well played mr. Gould!
---
*Lucas Rosalen*
rosalen.lu...@gmail.com
+55 19 9-8146-7633
2014-11-26 14:44 GMT-02:00 Ed Gould :
> Thanks.
> However *I* was the one that raised
Thanks.
However *I* was the one that raised a SHARE requirement for forfmid. :)
Ed
On Nov 26, 2014, at 7:30 AM, Lucas Rosalen wrote:
To apply PTFs for a specific fmid:
//APPLYEXEC PGM=GIMSMP,PARM='DATE=U',REGION=0M
//SMPCSI DD DISP=SHR,DSN=your_csi
//SMPCNTL DD *
SET BDY (your_target)
To apply PTFs for a specific fmid:
//APPLYEXEC PGM=GIMSMP,PARM='DATE=U',REGION=0M
//SMPCSI DD DISP=SHR,DSN=your_csi
//SMPCNTL DD *
SET BDY (your_target) .
APPLY PTFS FORFMID (your_fmid)
GROUPEXTEND BYPASS(HOLDSYS) RETRY(YES) C(ALL)
.
Hope this is what you've been looking for.
Lucas Rosale
Kurt:
I was working on a specific product and *ONLY* wanted maintenance for
that.
Time and again I had to figure out all the pertaining PTF's and do a
select(,,,,eee, etc etc) I did NOT want
maintenance for other products to be recieved and applied.
Ed
On Nov 25, 2014
On 2014-11-24, at 09:11, Chase, John wrote:
>
> GROUPEXTEND seems to be in force when the IFREQ FMID(s) exist(s) in (one of)
> the target zone(s) specified on RECEIVE ORDER. I have ordered specific PTFs
> for (e.g.) the COBOL v5.1 compiler (HADB510), and IFREQ PTF(s) for Language
> Environment
Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 3:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Getting ptfs for a specific FMID
Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
>>>>> Is it possible to use RECEIVE ORDER for a specific FMID?
>>>>> I am running SMP/E 36.11 on z/OS
Kurt Quackenbush wrote:
> Is it possible to use RECEIVE ORDER for a specific FMID?
> I am running SMP/E 36.11 on z/OS 1.13.
>
>> To what purpose? Limiting bandwidth for an urgently needed PTF? Sooner or
>> later you're likely to need all available PTFs. Easier to RECEIVE all and
>>
Is it possible to use RECEIVE ORDER for a specific FMID?
I am running SMP/E 36.11 on z/OS 1.13.
To what purpose? Limiting bandwidth for an urgently needed
PTF? Sooner or later you're likely to need all available PTFs.
Easier to RECEIVE all and APPLY SELECT( ... ) GROUPEXTEND
[CHECK]
Yes, yes
In
,
on 11/24/2014
at 08:05 AM, John McKown said:
>As an aside, if possible, could you adjust your email software to
>left justify your English text?
While I see extraneous blanks in his From: and To: lines the body
seems to be left justified. He's got Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="windo
Paul,
Way back when I was having a similar issue with applies so I asked
IBM (SHARE REQ) for apply forfmid.
I was lucky I asked for it and got it the the next SHARE so I am
guessing it was in the works already.
Ed
On Nov 24, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 07
Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Chase, John
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 11:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Getting ptfs for a specific FMID
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Chase, John
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 11:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Getting ptfs for a specific FMID
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf O
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 10:01 AM
>
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 07:41:14 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
> >
> >http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21225816
> >
> You can order mainten
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 07:41:14 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>
>http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21225816
>
You can order maintenance in the following ways:
>
>individual PTFs
>PTFs for individual APARs
>service for individual installed FMIDs
> <---
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of ??? ?? ???
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 7:55 AM
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to use RECEIVE ORDER for a specific FMID?
>
> I am running SMP/E 36.11 on z/OS 1.13.
Yes, but only if the specific FMID is the only FMI
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of John McKown
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 7:05 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Getting ptfs for a specific FMID
>
> Gadi,
>
> I don't think that is possible. Unless, of course, some product consists of a
Hi,
AFAIK normal RECEIVE ORDER does not have such a function to include or exclude
FMIDs, but there is an offering of IBM Germany which allows to specify a
BLACKLIST or a WHITELIST of FMIDs to be included or excluded, when you order
service. You'll find some information about this product named
Gadi,
I don't think that is possible. Unless, of course, some product consists of
a single FMID. But you can't, for instance, only order TCPIP independently
of z/OS. At least, I cannot see any way to do that.
As an aside, if possible, could you adjust your email software to left
justify your Engl
Hi,
Is it possible to use RECEIVE ORDER for a specific FMID?
I am running SMP/E 36.11 on z/OS 1.13.
Thanks
Gadi
לשימת לבך, בהתאם לנהלי חברת מלם מערכות בע"מ ו/או כל חברת בת ו/או חברה קשורה שלה
(להלן : "החברה") וזכויות החתימה בהן, כל הצעה, התחייבות או מצג מטעם ה
27 matches
Mail list logo
