> > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
> > עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
> > נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
> >
> > ________________________
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf
> > of Rupert Reynolds
> > Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2024 2:
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
> עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
> נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
>
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf
> of Rupert Reynolds
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 20
Discussion List on behalf of
Rupert Reynolds
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2024 2:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Hmm, 3 ... (Re: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation
question
It's too soon to publish much, especially when I have a full time job doing
something else. To b
List on behalf
> of Rupert Reynolds
> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2024 9:07 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Hmm, 3 ... (Re: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation
> question
>
> My experience of modern scripting languages, compared with classic Rexx, is
&g
arc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2024 7:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Hmm, 3 ... (Re: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation
question
Hey Rony,
From what I understand, you haven't had experience working on z/OS. Let's stick
to the topic an
Saturday, March 16, 2024 9:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Hmm, 3 ... (Re: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation
question
My experience of modern scripting languages, compared with classic Rexx, is
that they all do something new more easily, but also I can't think of one
idges <0587168ababf-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2024 9:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Hmm, 3 ... (Re: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation
question
Surely that's moon-pie and dreamscapes? There's no serious suggestion that
that will
Surely that's moon-pie and dreamscapes? There's no serious suggestion that
that will ever happen, is there? I'm all for it, but don't expect it ever.
---
Bob Bridges, robhbrid...@gmail.com, cell 336 382-7313
/* Sometimes you feel like a nut. After a day of working on a walnut farm, you
don't
My experience of modern scripting languages, compared with classic Rexx, is
that they all do something new more easily, but also I can't think of one
that doesn't have an obvious pitfall (such as, for example, stumbling badly
over certain byte values such as NUL in strings).
Classic Rexx under TSO
Hey Rony,
From what I understand, you haven't had experience working on z/OS. Let's stick
to the topic and focus on discussing REXX as it functions on z/OS. This means
no discussions about ooRexx or Java bridges, as they don't exist and are
unlikely to in the future on z/OS.
The majority of RE
On 16.03.2024 01:17, David Crayford wrote:
On 16 Mar 2024, at 7:45 am, Jay
Maynard<05997213d6c2-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
That depends. Can you use, say, Python to implement all the scripting kinds
of things you can use REXX for?
Like what, TSO? I don’t find I need to do that
11 matches
Mail list logo
