Re: [External] Re: Hybrid SMS Storage Group - Database

2019-06-11 Thread David Spiegel
M Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf >> Of John McKown >> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 8:06 AM >> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> Subject: [External] Re: Hybrid SMS Storage Group - Database >> >> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:40 AM Mike Schwab >> wrote: >&

Re: [External] Re: Hybrid SMS Storage Group - Database

2019-06-11 Thread John McKown
oing things "properly". Again, many years ago at a company that basically no longer exists. > > Rex > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of John McKown > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 8:06 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.E

Re: [External] Re: Hybrid SMS Storage Group - Database

2019-06-11 Thread Pommier, Rex
Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 8:06 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: Hybrid SMS Storage Group - Database On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:40 AM Mike Schwab wrote: > The problem with SSD storage is that the blocks in a matched

Re: [EXTERNAL] Hybrid SMS Storage Group - Database

2019-06-11 Thread Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Hybrid SMS Storage Group - Database Hi, Is there a possibility of performance degradation if SSD storage is added to SMS storage group that consists mainly of 15K SAS storage. Database tables are written to the storage group. We use a Dynamic Provisioning pool

Re: Hybrid SMS Storage Group - Database

2019-06-11 Thread John McKown
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:40 AM Mike Schwab wrote: > The problem with SSD storage is that the blocks in a matched set of > device start to fail at the same rate. Run long enough and you get > enough bad blocks in all devices and they all fail at roughly the same > time loosing the entire raid

Re: Hybrid SMS Storage Group - Database

2019-06-11 Thread Ken Bloom
ssion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike Schwab Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 8:40 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Hybrid SMS Storage Group - Database The problem with SSD storage is that the blocks in a matched set of device start to fail at the same rate. Run long enou

Re: Hybrid SMS Storage Group - Database

2019-06-11 Thread Mike Schwab
The problem with SSD storage is that the blocks in a matched set of device start to fail at the same rate. Run long enough and you get enough bad blocks in all devices and they all fail at roughly the same time loosing the entire raid group, you don't have enough time between failures to replace

Hybrid SMS Storage Group - Database

2019-06-11 Thread Buckton, T. (Theo)
Hi, Is there a possibility of performance degradation if SSD storage is added to SMS storage group that consists mainly of 15K SAS storage. Database tables are written to the storage group. We use a Dynamic Provisioning pool at disk subsystem level. Regards Nedbank Group Limited Internal