I've looked and looked at the Init and Tuning REF and Guide and I can't seem to
find an answer to my question, I'm hoping someone can provide a sanity check
for me.
I have a 2 system JES2 MAS both running z/OS 2.1, both checkpoints are
currently in a CF with mode=duplex and duplex=on.
my issue i
JES2 Checkpoint question
I've looked and looked at the Init and Tuning REF and Guide and I can't seem to
find an answer to my question, I'm hoping someone can provide a sanity check
for me.
I have a 2 system JES2 MAS both running z/OS 2.1, both checkpoints are
currently in a CF
tte
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 6:55 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: JES2 Checkpoint question
>
> I've looked and looked at the Ini
cover, but at the
timethere was no time.
Carmen
- Original Message -
From: "Gerhard Adam"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 9:08:21 AM
Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question
You shouldn't need both on DASD. However, I am curious as to
armen
- Original Message -
From: "Lizette Koehler"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 9:13:14 AM
Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question
Think IBM recommendation is for CKPT1 to be in CF and CKPT2 on DASD.
That way if either fails, you should be okay.
Side Note:
V.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 9:14:32 AM
Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question
thank you
I decided to do a cold start due to the fact while an attempt to move to
NEWCKPRT1 or 2 during startup I received I/O errors on the CKPT files, due to
time constrains on my downtime I had to get the
ginal Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 7:25 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question
>
> Finally received your reposne :)
> so using t
Great, I've used the reconfig dialog in test and it worked great, thanks again
Lizette !
Carmen
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-
Great, I've used the reconfig dialog in test and it worked great, thanks again
Lizette !
Carmen
- Original Message -
From: "Lizette Koehler"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 9:32:35 AM
Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question
Correct.
The
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 7:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question
thank you
I decided to do a cold start due to the fact while an attempt to move to
NEWCKPRT1 or 2 d
rd Adam
> Sent: 28 July, 2017 18:17
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question
>
> I wasn't sure if you were aware that you can make up a NEWCKPT
> dynamically and if it doesn't exist, JES2 will prompt you to create it.
>
> That way i
ng to reconfigure. A COLD start would indeed be the fastest.
>
> Kees.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>> Behalf Of Gerhard Adam
>> Sent: 28 July, 2017 18:17
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSE
M-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Gerhard Adam
> Sent: 31 July, 2017 12:11
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question
>
> I disagree. The point of reconfiguration is also to recover from
> checkpoint loss.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
iscussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Gerhard Adam
> Sent: 31 July, 2017 12:11
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question
>
> I disagree. The point of reconfiguration is also to recover from
> checkpoint loss.
>
m: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo
> Sent: 31 July, 2017 14:24
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: JES2 Checkpoint question
>
> That what I was thinking, according to the doc, and its not 100% clear I
> can recove
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 5:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: JES2 Checkpoint question
I think I remember from the past, when we had CKPT in the CF, that only 1 of
every 10 writes to the primary ckpt is done t
EXTERNAL: JES2 Checkpoint question
I've looked and looked at the Init and Tuning REF and Guide and I can't seem to
find an answer to my question, I'm hoping someone can provide a sanity check
for me.
I have a 2 system JES2 MAS both running z/OS 2.1, both checkpoints are
currently in a C
rnatives during that shutdown weekend.
thanks again for the sanity check, Much appreciated !
Carmen
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Whitteridge"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 11:32:06 AM
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: JES2 Checkpoint question
We run
n List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 10:41 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: JES2 Checkpoint question
>
> That's good to know Jerry, thank you.
> shutdown was normal and successful, the P
great help.
Carmen
- Original Message -
From: "Lizette Koehler"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 1:24:35 PM
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: JES2 Checkpoint question
So next time you are working on the CEC with the CF, you could use the RECONFIG
to move the CKP
20 matches
Mail list logo
