On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:09:49 -0600, Wendell Lovewell wrote:
>>>Except for instream data sets. Are you actually commenting
>>>your instream data in that fashion‽
>
>I'm keeping source code on the PC, so the compiles and other types of jobs
>often include the source code itself in the jobstream.
>>Except for instream data sets. Are you actually commenting
>>your instream data in that fashion‽
I'm keeping source code on the PC, so the compiles and other types of jobs
often include the source code itself in the jobstream. I do have comments
past 80 in the program source.
-
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 12:35:58 -0600, Wendell Lovewell wrote:
>...
>>>I wrote an ISPF Edit macro to submit with no F-80 limitation.
>
>My Kedit macro allows > 80 byte records. But it's not the default, because I
>use beyond col 80 as line comments that are intentionally stripped off before
>be
Hi Gil.
>>Would a unit record device other than PUN (perhaps PIPEd)
>>relax that constraint?
>>As I learned Pipelines I adopted the habit of DEFINing a fresh
>>UR device rather than saving and restoring the characteristics
>>of an existing one (and CONT can't be restored.)
The last time I made
e
Hessling Editor).
http://hessling-editor.sourceforge.net/doc/commset/SETPENDING.html
Best regards
Mike
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Im Auftrag von
Seymour J Metz
Gesendet: Monday, March 07, 2022 19:06
An: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Betreff: Re: Job submission fro
I have done both. The difference in configuration was that when the MVS
and VM systems were on the same physical system with MVS running under
VM, we submitted to the virtual reader. When the systems were on
separate physical systems, we used RSCS. Eventually, we moved to using
RSCS as the job
n.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Mike Beer [m...@beer.at]
Sent: Monday, March 7, 2022 2:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: AW: Job submission from CMS to MVS
Depending on what you need,
LPREFIX on KEDIT might be your comm
On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 11:05:22 -0600, Wendell Lovewell wrote:
>
>Many years ago, I used a virtual card reader on MVS and the CMS users used a
>REXX exec to
>'SPOOL PUN TO zosvm...'
>'PUNCH fn ft fm ( NOH'
>'CLOSE PUN'
>
>You might have to play games to have longer than 80-byte records in your jobs.
t-
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Im Auftrag von
Seymour J Metz
Gesendet: Monday, March 07, 2022 19:06
An: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Betreff: Re: Job submission from CMS to MVS
I've used KEDIT, with Quercus REXX; it was all right, but I had been spoiled
by XEDIT and I badly missed prefix ma
[IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Wendell Lovewell [01e9c0ee0673-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Monday, March 7, 2022 12:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Job submission from CMS to MVS
Hi Shmuel.
Many years ago, I used a virtual card reader on MVS and the CMS use
Hi Shmuel.
Many years ago, I used a virtual card reader on MVS and the CMS users used a
REXX exec to
'SPOOL PUN TO zosvm...'
'PUNCH fn ft fm ( NOH'
'CLOSE PUN'
You might have to play games to have longer than 80-byte records in your jobs.
And RSCS will (I think) propagate the CMS userid as
Shmuel,
I use have the VM 'submit' exec spool it to a disconnected user that in
turn submits the jcl to z/OS via FTP. I use RSCS to get the output back
to the original user (if needed).
I use FTP because I don't have RACF on z/VM and RSCS does not properly
pass the credentials without having
Shmuel I use RSCS to z/OS 2.4 here; works great.
DJ
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
A.EDU] on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin [000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Sunday, March 6, 2022 10:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Job submission from CMS to MVS
On Mar 6, 2022, at 07:58:17, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> There are two obvious way to submit an M
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
David Spiegel [dspiegel...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 6, 2022 10:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Job submission from CMS to MVS
Hi R'Shmuel AMV"SH,
Gut Voch
How about via TCP/IP from CMS?
Regards,
David
On 2022-03-06 09:58, Seymo
Hi R'Shmuel AMV"SH,
Gut Voch
How about via TCP/IP from CMS?
Regards,
David
On 2022-03-06 09:58, Seymour J Metz wrote:
There are two obvious way to submit an MVS job from CMS:
1. Spool it ti RSCS and let it go in via NJE
2. Spool it to a virtual reader on MVS
I'm curious as to how many s
On Mar 6, 2022, at 07:58:17, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> There are two obvious way to submit an MVS job from CMS:
>
> 1. Spool it ti RSCS and let it go in via NJE
>
> 2. Spool it to a virtual reader on MVS
>
(Not for real MVS.)
3. (Not obvious?) FTP SITE FILE=JES.
(Works alike from d
There are two obvious way to submit an MVS job from CMS:
1. Spool it ti RSCS and let it go in via NJE
2. Spool it to a virtual reader on MVS
I'm curious as to how many shops do which, and how they're configured.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
-
18 matches
Mail list logo
