: [IBM-MAIN] LLA Management of Linklst datasets
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 03:42:00 -0800, Ron Hawkins
ronjhawk...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Mark,
My thinking is that the copy of the directories in LLA does not change
automatically when you dynamically add a dataset to linklist, and that
an LLA
rel...@us.ibm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU,
Date: 01/10/2013 05:25 AM
Subject:LLA Management of Linklst datasets
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
LLA manages the LNKLST by default. That includes the IPL-time and post-IPL
LNKLSTs. New
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:15:56 -0800, Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
wrote:
If a shop has more than *one* sysprog, deferred LLA update/refresh is a
disaster lying in wait. YOU may think refresh will occur if and when YOU
are ready, but someone else may be navigating a different trajectory.
Hello All,
I have a small doubt on LLA management of datasets.
I know LLA managed all Linklst datasets by default and my query is if I
have added a new dataset in a new lnklst set and activated this set so will
it be come under lla management Or do i need to refresh/modify LLA. I am
sure for
Hello All,
I have a small doubt on LLA management of datasets.
I know LLA managed all Linklst datasets by default and my query is if I
have added a new dataset in a new lnklst set and activated this set so will
it be come under lla management Or do i need to refresh/modify LLA. I am
sure for
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 01:08:18 +0530, sunil mirchandani
sunilmirchandani1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
I have a small doubt on LLA management of datasets.
I know LLA managed all Linklst datasets by default and my query is if I
have added a new dataset in a new lnklst set and activated this
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
:: Behalf Of sunil mirchandani
:: Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 11:38 AM
:: To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:: Subject: LLA Management of Linklst datasets
::
:: Hello All,
::
:: I have a small doubt on LLA management of datasets.
::
:: I know LLA managed all Linklst
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:38:37 -0800, retired mainframer
retired-mainfra...@q.com wrote:
My rule of thumb, drilled into me long before z/OS, was any change to the
link list merits a refresh of LLA. Don't know if it's still valid but it
never caused a problem. To me, it looks like very cheap
Subject: Re: LLA Management of Linklst datasets
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:38:37 -0800, retired mainframer
retired-mainfra...@q.com wrote:
My rule of thumb, drilled into me long before z/OS, was any change to
the link list merits a refresh of LLA. Don't know if it's still valid
but it never caused
Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 01:05:44
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: LLA Management of Linklst datasets
Hello All,
I have a small doubt on LLA management of datasets.
I know LLA
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: LLA Management of Linklst datasets
Hello All,
I have a small doubt on LLA management of datasets.
I know LLA managed all Linklst datasets by default and my query is if I
have added a new dataset in a new lnklst set
11 matches
Mail list logo