In 5c8fv3f78unypshw9tyopynk.1388251271...@email.android.com, on
12/28/2013
at 12:21 PM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
The user-friendly interactive nature of CMS.
Rhat would seem to describe TSO as well. The only place where CMS has
a clear edge, IMHO, is XEDIT.
--
Shmuel
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2013 2:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Learning Rexx (was: Need tutorial)
On 2013-12-28, at 10:21, Charles Mills wrote:
The user-friendly interactive nature
In 07dd01cf055e$eb92e0d0$c2b8a270$@mcn.org, on 12/30/2013
at 07:59 AM, Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org said:
It's really a separate topic, but I think there is little doubt
that it makes sense to edit code of any sort in some fast
character-at-a-time interactive environment even if the target
On 2013-12-28, at 10:21, Charles Mills wrote:
The user-friendly interactive nature of CMS.
How would you rank CMS vis-a-vis Unix System Services by
this criterion? Before USS was available I tended to edit
JCL on CMS with XEDIT; nowadays on Solaris, often accessing
legacy data sets with
On 2013-12-28, at 09:47, Charles Mills wrote:
Actually CMS on VM better for rexx than z/OS.
Why? (Risking an advocacy thread.)
For me, one reason is the CMS HELP facility. In fact,
sometimes coding Rexx for z/OS I'll log on to CMS merely
to use HELP REXX instruction.
Other reasons?
--
The user-friendly interactive nature of CMS.
Charles
Composed on a mobile: please excuse my brevity
Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On 2013-12-28, at 09:47, Charles Mills wrote:
Actually CMS on VM better for rexx than z/OS.
Why? (Risking an advocacy thread.)
For me, one
