I dont think so . During our DB2 v10 upgrade, we had to increase maxspace
to 16000 M ,then we added only the local page datasets .
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Robert Hahne roberthahne...@hotmail.comwrote:
Greetings ,
We have a requirement in our shop to change the MAXSPACE value from
pages.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Robert Hahne
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 14:57
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MAXSPACE and central storage
but , i feel there might be some performance
Take a look at the APAR OA22623 . This is pretty old one , but worth reading
Thank you,
Roger
From: Vernooij, CP - SPLXM kees.verno...@klm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: MAXSPACE and central storage
I
: MAXSPACE and central storage
I don't think performance will degrade because of the MAXSPACE value,
but before that happens, you will notify paging and paging-delays
because of insufficient central storage. I suggest you monitor paging
and %full of the local pagedatasets.
You should have
Greetings ,
We have a requirement in our shop to change the MAXSPACE value from 2000M to
8000M . IBM says there should be a 1:3 ratio between maxspace and auxiliary
storage . that means , my total auxiliary storage needs to be increased by 3
times which is 24000 M (to satisfy 1:3 ratio) . I
