) 273-1298
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pinnacle
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 3:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Mischaracterized HOLDDATA
For those of you who always laughed when I said read your HOLD(DOC
Of John Eells
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 5:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Mischaracterized HOLDDATA
Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
> Whether ACTION or DOC, these instructions need to be qualified many times
> over. IBM occasionally PEs a PTF over some problem with HOL
Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
Whether ACTION or DOC, these instructions need to be qualified many times over.
IBM occasionally PEs a PTF over some problem with HOLD data--usually when it's
missing. There may be nothing wrong with the code, just the packaging and
accompanying--or not--documentation.
Point of clarity here. When SMP/E added the HOLDDATA report, they added
the ability to exclude any category, and many sysprogs immediately
excluded DOC, thinking they were a waste of time to look at. Whenever I
talked about looking at ALL HOLDDATA, even the DOCs, because sometimes
it's
2017 3:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mischaracterized HOLDDATA
On Thu, 18 May 2017 20:26:03 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>I would prefer it be an action hold rather than a doc hold in this case.
It isn't either/or. Sometimes it is appropriate to have both a DOC and an
ACTION
On Thu, 18 May 2017 20:26:03 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>I would prefer it be an action hold rather than a doc hold in this case.
It isn't either/or. Sometimes it is appropriate to have both a DOC and an
ACTION hold.
--
Tom Marchant
1:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: Mischaracterized HOLDDATA
On Thu, 18 May 2017 14:14:10 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>Can IBM repair this even after the fact? I know SMPHOLD may contain
>++HOLD ... ACTION. But I doubt that LIST ERRSYSMODS will show it,
Do yo
On Thu, 18 May 2017 14:14:10 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>Can IBM repair this even after the fact? I know SMPHOLD may contain
>++HOLD ... ACTION. But I doubt that LIST ERRSYSMODS will show it,
Do you mean LIST HOLDERROR? or perhaps REPORT ERRSYSMODS?
Either way, it will not. Doc and Action
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 3:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mischaracterized HOLDDATA
This is a swampy area captured in the caveat 'perform these steps if you choose
to use
On 5/18/2017 4:00 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
This is a swampy area captured in the caveat 'perform these steps if you choose
to use it'. If a shop has not already RDEFINEd MVS.MCSOPER.* with elaborate
profile support in place, blandly issuing these commands as documented would
immediately
On 2017-05-18, at 14:01, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
> This is a swampy area captured in the caveat 'perform these steps if you
> choose to use it'.
>
Ugh.
On 2017-05-18, at 13:10, Burrell, Todd wrote:
> Well this really should have been labeled as HOLD(ACTION).And I usually
> look through
):Re: Mischaracterized HOLDDATA
Well this really should have been labeled as HOLD(ACTION).And I usually
look through the DOC for stuff like this, but I've never seen something quite
so egregious.
Todd Burrell | Sr. Mainframe Systems Administrator CSX Technologies| 550 Water
St. (634I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pinnacle
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 3:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Mischaracterized HOLDDATA
For those of you who always laughed when I said read your HOLD(DOC) for buried
HOLD
For those of you who always laughed when I said read your HOLD(DOC) for
buried HOLD(ACTION) items. Here it is kids, so for those of you who
still ignore HOLD(DOC), keep telling yourselves that you're saving time
and I'm crazy for looking at HOLD(DOC).
++HOLD(UI43841) SYSTEM FMID(HSMA21A)
14 matches
Mail list logo
