Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

2015-05-31 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <0a0e01d0994a$e99c0410$bcd40c30$@mcn.org>, on 05/28/2015 at 06:33 AM, Charles Mills said: >Well, I moved ISAUTH() unchanged to its own assembler module. No >change in the error. I removed the IEABRCX DEFINE and bingo! It >works. My guess is that it doesn't recognize the eye catcher unless

Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

2015-05-29 Thread Pommier, Rex
Lizette, You are absolutely correct. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 7:53 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON) SDSF I

Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

2015-05-28 Thread Lizette Koehler
SDSF I believe is ISF Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > On Behalf Of Ed Gould > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 4:39 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

2015-05-28 Thread Charles Mills
not have all the answers. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Ed Gould Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 4:39 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON) Charles (and others) Has LE o

Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

2015-05-28 Thread Ed Gould
do I know. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM- m...@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Andy Wood Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 2:33 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON) On Thu, 28 May 2015 07:56:03 -0700,

Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

2015-05-28 Thread Charles Mills
, May 28, 2015 2:33 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON) On Thu, 28 May 2015 07:56:03 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: . . . > >I would assume C++ gets the stack at startup, not on the first external >call. Interesting thought. I have this very

Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

2015-05-28 Thread Andy Wood
On Thu, 28 May 2015 07:56:03 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: . . . > >I would assume C++ gets the stack at startup, not on the first external >call. Interesting thought. I have this very vague recollection, that when RPTSTG is ON, things are set up so that the stack is always too small (or gives th

Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

2015-05-28 Thread Charles Mills
eed to get back to my real job. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Bernd Oppolzer Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 7:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON) My only guess is:

Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

2015-05-28 Thread Charles Mills
: Thursday, May 28, 2015 7:37 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON) Is it time to fire up a PMR? On 28/05/2015 9:55 PM, Charles Mills wrote: > FWIW, I can duplicate the problem with a call from a trivial C++ program. > Whether or not the program actua

Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

2015-05-28 Thread David Crayford
) CEE3798I ATTEMPTING TO TAKE A DUMP FOR ABEND U4088 TO DATA SET: ... Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 6:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mysterious U4088-

Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

2015-05-28 Thread Bernd Oppolzer
-Original Message- Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 15:33:41 +0200 Subject: Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON) From: Charles Mills To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Well, I moved ISAUTH() unchanged to its own assembler module. No change in the error. I removed the IEABRCX DEFINE and

Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

2015-05-28 Thread Charles Mills
Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 6:34 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON) Well, I moved ISAUTH() unchanged to its own assemble

Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

2015-05-28 Thread Charles Mills
retur 001C 110+ DCAL4(ISAUTH) Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 8:36 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU S

Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

2015-05-27 Thread Charles Mills
0001C 1759+ LM2,12,28(13)resto 051E1760+ BALR 1,14 retur 08761761+ DCAL4(ISAUTH) Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.ED

Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

2015-05-27 Thread glen herrmannsfeldt
In article <09a301d098e6$0607d120$12177360$@mcn.org> you wrote: (snip) > I have isolated the ABEND to a call to a self-written assembler function > called ISAUTH. I execute a printf() immediately before the call but not a > printf() after. I am posting below the entire code of ISAUTH. CDSALEN has

Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)

2015-05-27 Thread Charles Mills
I have a C++ program that I am testing that is working perfectly in all regards except one. When I run it with //CEEOPTS DD * RPTSTG(ON) /* it ABENDs with U4088-63 which is documented as save area chain corruption. I can run it with TERMTHDACT(DUMP) or with HEAPCHK(ON,10,0,1