Re: OS/390 (not z/OS) question

2018-11-21 Thread Robert Longabaugh
n't 3590 a generic? > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf > of Tony Thigpen > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 7:59 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@listser

Re: OS/390 (not z/OS) question

2018-11-21 Thread Seymour J Metz
Isn't 3590 a generic? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tony Thigpen Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 7:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: OS/390 (not z/OS) que

Re: OS/390 (not z/OS) question

2018-11-21 Thread Dana Mitchell
Tony, As you noticed, 3590-1 is a system generated 'generic' names of all your tape devices. The conventions are shown here: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.arci000/taptabl.htm In order to steer your allocations to the proper sub-device type, you m

Re: OS/390 (not z/OS) question

2018-11-21 Thread Carmen Vitullo
's worth a try. Carmen Vitullo - Original Message - From: "Tony Thigpen" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 8:02:15 AM Subject: Re: OS/390 (not z/OS) question When I use HCD to 'Work with EDTs', it shows locally defined eso

Re: OS/390 (not z/OS) question

2018-11-21 Thread Tony Thigpen
nt: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 12:59 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: OS/390 (not z/OS) question In an OS/390 2.10 system. where is the esoteric 3590-1 defined? Can it be overridden? We are trying to migrate an old OS/390 system and the first stage is to migrate the tape usage to a VTL. T

Re: OS/390 (not z/OS) question

2018-11-21 Thread Giovanni Bozzetti
: OS/390 (not z/OS) question In an OS/390 2.10 system. where is the esoteric 3590-1 defined? Can it be overridden? We are trying to migrate an old OS/390 system and the first stage is to migrate the tape usage to a VTL. The VTL looks like 3590-128trk while the old 3590s are 3590-256trak. The

Re: OS/390 (not z/OS) question

2018-11-21 Thread Giovanni Bozzetti
, 2018 12:59 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: OS/390 (not z/OS) question In an OS/390 2.10 system. where is the esoteric 3590-1 defined? Can it be overridden? We are trying to migrate an old OS/390 system and the first stage is to migrate the tape usage to a VTL. The VTL looks like 3590

Re: OS/390 (not z/OS) question

2018-11-21 Thread Roger Lowe
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:59:03 -0500, Tony Thigpen wrote: >In an OS/390 2.10 system. where is the esoteric 3590-1 defined? Can it >be overridden? > >We are trying to migrate an old OS/390 system and the first stage is to >migrate the tape usage to a VTL. The VTL looks like 3590-128trk while >the ol

OS/390 (not z/OS) question

2018-11-21 Thread Tony Thigpen
In an OS/390 2.10 system. where is the esoteric 3590-1 defined? Can it be overridden? We are trying to migrate an old OS/390 system and the first stage is to migrate the tape usage to a VTL. The VTL looks like 3590-128trk while the old 3590s are 3590-256trak. The problem is that when an inpu