In
,
on 01/20/2015
at 08:29 AM, Peter Relson said:
>I don't know of any reentrant code in the BCP in assembler or
>(internal) PL/X for which static does not happen to equate to
>constant-after-load.
While some nonreshaable reentrant code ib OS/360 survived into MVS, my
understanding is that
>If now with new releases of the
>OpSys, all modules linked as RENT will be read only,
I'm not sure where that thought came from. The operating system rule has
been in place for way longer than I have.
In general, reentrant modules from APF-authorized concatenations are
placed into key 0 storage
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:18:37 +0100, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
>
>even a program that is linked as RENT may in certain circumstances
>need to store some information in static storage. Think of a routine
>that is
>establishing a cache memory for a table access that is valid for ALL
>parallel
>running thr
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Bernd Oppolzer
wrote:
> Am 19.01.2015 um 13:32 schrieb Peter Relson:
>
>> Even a non-authorized program which is linked RENT
>>> can write into its STATIC CSECT.
>>>
>> But only if the program is not fetched from an APF-authorized
>> concatenation (and maybe that'
Am 19.01.2015 um 13:32 schrieb Peter Relson:
Even a non-authorized program which is linked RENT
can write into its STATIC CSECT.
But only if the program is not fetched from an APF-authorized
concatenation (and maybe that's a requirement for PL/I programs with this
characteristic).
In that case,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:40:30 -0600, John McKown wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
> >
> >> >Even a non-authorized program which is linked RENT
> >> >can write i
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 06:40:30 -0600, John McKown wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
>
>> >Even a non-authorized program which is linked RENT
>> >can write into its STATIC CSECT.
>>
>> But only if the program is not fetched from an APF-authorized
>> concatenation ...
>>
>A
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
> >Even a non-authorized program which is linked RENT
> >can write into its STATIC CSECT.
>
> But only if the program is not fetched from an APF-authorized
> concatenation (and maybe that's a requirement for PL/I programs with this
> characteri
>Even a non-authorized program which is linked RENT
>can write into its STATIC CSECT.
But only if the program is not fetched from an APF-authorized
concatenation (and maybe that's a requirement for PL/I programs with this
characteristic).
In that case, the program can write into the program it
Am 18.01.2015 um 17:19 schrieb Peter Relson:
Storage for static variables, i.e. variables declared with
the STATIC keyword, is "allocated" in the so called static
CSECT that becomes part of the object module. Note that
this *is* read/write storage, so in PL/I STATIC does not
mean constant.
If it
10 matches
Mail list logo
